Cardinals must announce
that they offer Holy Mass while interpreting Vatican Council II rationally and
not irrationally and that Pope Francis must do the same.
It must be clear for the
cardinals that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to only
hypothetical cases always.
So the passages marked in
red (hypothetical) do not contradict the passages marked in blue, which are
orthodox and support the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. The text of
Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. We have only Feeneyite passages. The red passages are null and empty in real life.
This was not known to
Rahner, Ratzinger, Bea, Alfredo Ottaviani and Marcel Lefebvre. For them the red was an
exception for the blue? Authors of books on Vatican Council II did not know
this. These books are obsolete now. Since we know we can interpret Vatican Council II rationally. We have a choice.
Cardinals Semarero and Kasper must retract
their books on Ecclesiology and Vatican
Council II.They are presently recommended reading at
the pontifical universities.
Even Pope Benedict’s books
are now obsolete. For him ‘the red is was an exception for the blue.' Even the books on Vatican Council II published by the SSPX’s Angelus Press are obsolete. They
include the writings of Roberto de Mattei. He was interpreting Vatican Council
II irrationally, like Fr. Serafino Lanzetta, whom he often cites.
So at the next Conclave of
Cardinals to elect a pope it must be understand that Vatican Council II can
only be interpreted rationally and like the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Pope John Paul II, it is traditional and Feeneyite.
The Church has returned to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the
ecclesiology of the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Paul
IX. The Church no more follows the Left with Vatican Council II interpreted
irrationally.
So the Daughters of St. Paul
book shop at the Vatican, for example, must stop displaying books with Vatican Council II
interpreted irrationally. The new books on Ecclesiology must only interpret the
Council rationally, ‘the red is not an exception for the blue '.
So the Decree of Prohibitions against the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire by the Dicastery for Doctrine and Faith (DDF), Vatican, must be lifted. Since with
Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, even the Dicastery for the Doctrine
of the Faith is Feeneyite.
Archbishop Victor Manuel
Fernandez is Feeneyite when the red is
not an exception for the blue. All the cardinals are Feeneyite when they
interpret Vatican Council II rationally. So the religious sisters will be
Feeneyite, including the Daughters of St. Paul.
Fernandez has to become a
traditionalist. He cannot keep interpreting Vatican Council II unethically.
With Vatican Council II
rational the Church has to return to the ecclesiology of the 1929 Concordat and
the old Roman Missal.
For the old Missal outside
the Church there was no salvation.The teaching of the Church was that all need to be members of the Catholic Church
to avoid Hell.
The Church has to go back
to the past in theology since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted
honestly. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are always hypothetical
cases only.
They are not exceptions
for Feeneyite EENS or Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 which say all need faith
and baptism for salvation.
So there can no more be a
liberal new ecumenism, new ecclesiology, new evangelization etc. There is no
precedent for the Synod's liberalism, since the
Council has returned to the past exclusivist ecclesiology.
The altar rails for
Communion need to be restored in
the Church since there is a return to the old lex orandi and the Roman Missal with Vatican Council rational.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
