In the interview with John Henry Weston, Bishop Athanasius Schneider did not refer to 'the dogma' extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He did not also say that Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) was not in conflict with the strict interpretation of EENS.
Bishop Schneider will not interpret Vatican Council II, with the Rational Premise.He will not choose Feeneyism instead of the present irrational Cushingism.So he is unable to correct Pope Francis on the error in Traditionis Custode.
Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism in Traditionis Custode. Cushingism says invisible cases are visible in the present times.
So for Pope Francis and Bishop Schneider invisible cases of LG 8,14,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times(1965-2022).
They are objective and known exceptions for the strict interpretation of EENS according to the Jesuits in the 16th century.
This was also the irrational reasoning of Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, in two papers of the International Theological Commission.They accepted the error of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office, a political-left document referenced in Vatican Council II. They were approved by the ADL, which tells the Catholic Church what is permitted and what is not.
I interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so there is no break with the dogma EENS of the Patristic period. So the lex orandi for me can only be the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal (1580).Since the old theology was rational. It did not confuse invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire or a good conscience, as being objective cases for us human beings. If someone was saved as such it would only be hypothetical for us humans on earth and real for God.
So for me the lex orandi cannot be exclusively limited to the Novus Ordo Mass with the New Missal. Since the New Missal is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise. So it has to be re-interpreted rationally and traditionally so that it is not Cushingite.How can people continue to interpret the Creeds, Catechisms, dogma EENS, baptism of desire and Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise at Holy Mass ?
When Bishop Schneider interprets and affirms in public, the strict interpretation of EENS, with no exceptions, and also Vatican Council II, having only hypothetical cases of LG 8,14,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc,in 2022-2023, then he can correct the mistake in Traditionis Custode.
He would then be ready to tell Pope Francis to please interpret Vatican Council II rationally and let the lex orandi be limited to only the old Missal.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
