Both Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt are
using the same Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so break with
Tradition, especially Magisterial Documents which support exclusive salvation
in the Catholic Church.Michael Matt is the Editor of Remnant TV. He believes that there is division between traditionalists and liberals.This is
seen in the Latin Mass for him.But this division was really created by the False Premise.This was not know to
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.It was also
unknown to Cardinal Marx.
If they all simply used the Rational
Premise to interpret Vatican Council II there would be a continuity with
Tradition, especially ecclesiocentrism.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.
Taylor Marshall have said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of
desire(LG 14).There are no explicit cases of the implicit baptism of desire of
St. Thomas Aquinas.But for the liberals and traditionalists the baptism of
desire is explicit.Physically visible. So extra ecclesiam nulla salus becomes
obsolete for Cardinal Marx and Michael Matt.-Lionel Andrades