The red is not an exception for the blue. But when Pope Francis issued Traditionis Custode he interpreted Vatican Council II with the red being an exception for the blue. This was a public mistake.He is a Cushingite. We can correct the error.

 

The red is not an exception for the blue. But when Pope Francis issued Traditionis Custode he interpreted Vatican Council II with the red being an exception for the blue. This was a public mistake.He is a Cushingite. We can correct the error.

When what is invisible is seen as being visible, I call it Cushingism.

When what is invisible is seen as being invisible I call it Feeneyism.

Here we have Cushingism and Feeneyism as a philosophy, an observation, a way of looking at things. Cushingism if used is irrational but the popes from Paul VI to Francis have been only Cushingites. )

Their irrational premise is that invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 16 etc are visible.

Their inference is that invisible cases of LG 8,14, 16 etc are visible and so practical examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times.So they are objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Invisible people are projected as known examples of salvation outside the Church, without faith and baptism.

They conclude that LG 8,14,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II , contradicts EENS and the Council is  a rupture with Tradition.

So with this Cushingite reasoning Pope Francis rejects the ecclesiology of the 16^th century Roman Missal - there are visible exceptions for him.

So Traditionis Custode sees the Novus Ordo as the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.But how can there be a lex orandi based upon Cushingim?

Traditionis Custode is Cushingite for Pope Francis and so is the baptism of desire and Vatican Council II itself. So the Roman Missal is rejected with the Cushingism of Vatican Council II, the physically visible cases of the baptism of desire etc.

But there cannot be a lex orandi with heretical Cushingism. It means the Nicene Creed is also Cushingite (‘I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water.’ If the three baptisms included the baptism of water, they would be Feeneyite).This is not Catholic.

If Pope Francis would interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) and also LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, and the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms with Feeneyism, instead of Cushingism, then the lex orandi would be Feeneyite at Mass in Latin and the vernacular. The theology would be traditional at every Mass, including the Byzantine Mass and the Syro Malabar  or Melkite Mass.

So here we have Feeneyism and Cushingism as a theology.

So there no more would be ‘a new magisterium’ for Cardinal Arthur Roche, based upon irrational and heretical Cushingism. It would be a return to the centuries old Magisterium of the Church which has always been Feeneyite. The popes and saint were Feeneyite. They did not use the irrational premise, inference and non traditional conclusion to interpret Church Documents (Creeds and Catechisms etc).

If we use the model of the Two Columns, we can further see how a deceptive theology was being used (and still is) within the Church to reject Tradition. This is political. It is not Catholic. We now have identified the error. We can correct it and then the whole Church returns to Tradition.

Let me repeat:

Feeneyism and Cushingism are a philosophy, an observation, a way of looking.

Feeneyism and Cushingism then become a theology in the present times. It says outside the Church there is no salvation (Feeneyism) or outside the Church there is salvation, known salvation (Cushingism).

Cushingism as a philosophy produces a New Theology. This New Theology is based upon the false premise, inference and conclusion. It is Cushingite. So the liberalism in the Church, the Cushingism, comes from the false premise, inference and non traditional conclusion.

Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops choose Cushingism as a philosophy and theology. I choose Feeneyism. The Magisterium over the centuries was Feeneyite.

When we read Vatican Council II with the red not being an exception for the blue, we are left with only Feeneyite passages. Since the Cushingite passages (BOD and I.I) are null and void, they do not exist in our human reality. Vatican Council II emerges Feeneyite. We have only one option. It is the rational option. We can only accept a Feeneyite Vatican Council II, a Feeneyite Nicene Creed, a Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic Church, a Feeneyite Catechisms of Pope Pius X etc. - Lionel Andrades

• Cushing Additions (2)
• Cushing heresy (5)
• Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
• Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples in Vatican Council II (25)
• Cushingism (117)
• Cushingism and the Catholic popes(8)
• Cushingism at Vatican Council II (1)
• Cushingism in Vatican Council II (17)
• Cushingismo (6)
• Cushingite (3)
• Cushingite Bishops (1)
• Cushingite examples (1)
• Cushingite passages cannot be exceptions to EENS (1)
• Cushingite propaganda on the Internet (1)
• Cushingite Theology (6)
• Cushingite Vatican Council II (1)
• Cushingites (1)
• Cushingites must make the correction(1)

• Feeneyism (111)
• Feeneyism is the missing link (9)
• Feeneyism on Wikipedia (13)
• Feeneyism.Cushingism (7)
• Feeneyismo (10)
• Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic Church 1995 (2)
• Feeneyite Catholic College (1)
• Feeneyite EENS (1)
• Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) (4)
• Feeneyite Theology (1)
• Feeneyite Vatican Council II (2)
• Feeneyite-Cushingite Model (1)
• Feeneyites (4)

• 
  

• Graphics (Primer on Feeneyism and Cushingism ) (1)
• Graphics ( Cushingite Traditionalists)(1)
• Graphics (Cushingism) (2)

JULY 29, 2019

Dietrich and Alice von Hildebrand, Paolo Pascualucci, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Roberto dei Mattei, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Christopher Ferrara, Mons. Ignacio Barreiro and others were all interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism.So this line of traditionalist writers had it wrong on the Council.Their premise was wrong and so their conclusion was wronghttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/dietrich-and-alice-von-hildebrand-paolo.html

 




FROM THE RIGHT HAND BAR.CLICK TO ACCESS

• Red is an exception to the blue-Bologna School/ Fr.John Zuhlsdorf(1)
• Red is not an exception to the blue - Proclamation (2)
• Red is not an exception to the blue - profances Holy Mass (1)
• Red is not an exception to the blue :CCC 846-848 (4)
• Red not an exception to blue mapping(1)

Roberto dei Mattei will not announce that he made a mistake on Vatican Council II all these years

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/roberto-dei-mattei-will-not-announce.html

JULY 27, 2019

Taylor Marshall interprets St.Thomas Aquinas with Cushingism and not Feeneyism and so there is a rupture with Tradition for him

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/taylor-marshall-interprets-stthomas.html

JULY 3, 2023

 

We have a revolution in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. There is a re-interpretation. It takes the Church back to the past ecclesiology. This is a new discovery. It will come as a surprise to many. It is simple.The red is not an exception for the blue. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is not an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Council of Florence(1442) and the Athanasius Creed. This was not known to even the traditionalists like the SSPX, CMRI,MHT, MHFM etc. They were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/we-have-revolution-in-interpretation-of.html