No one is formally asking Bishop Roland Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, only. Vocations to the religious life in Dijon, France must be told to interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise. Religious Superiors must make their Profession of Faith and take their Oath of Office in public, only by accepting and affirming Vatican Council II (Rational).

 

In interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to invisible and unknown people in 2022. Bishop Roland Minnerath interprets them as referring to physically visible and known non Catholics saves outside the Church without faith and the baptism of water. No one is formally asking Bishop Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, only.

He has written a book supporting a theology of religions and another book critical of the Syllabus of Errors. In both these books he used the False Premise (invisible cases are visible) to interpret Vatican Council II.

So with the False Premise these books are Christocentric and not Ecclesiocentric/ Christocentric. The False Premise creates the New Theology which projects exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism. His books are written with the New Theology and not the old theology. He supports the New Ecumenism, since with the False Premise he creates exceptions for the old ecumenism of return.

Vocations to the religious life in Dijon, France must be told to interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.

Religious Superiors must make their Profession of Faith and take their Oath of Office in public, only by accepting and affirming Vatican Council II (Rational).  -Lionel Andrades

 

June 29, 2021

Bishop Roland Minnerath has interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and with this error has written a book on 'the theology of religions' he has also interpreted the Syllabus of Errors with a false premise and published books with this error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/06/bishop-roland-minnerath-has-interpreted

NOVEMBER 23, 2021

Vocations to the Religious Life in Dijon, France have to interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc) with a False Premise and so reject the traditional interpretation of the Creeds and Catechisms to be politically correct with Macron and the Left in France.It is the same in Spain and England.

 Vocations to the Religious Life in Dijon, France have to interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc) with a False Premise and so reject the traditional interpretation of the Creeds and Catechisms to be politically correct  with Macron and the Left in France.It is the same in Spain and England.Those Catholics who go for Holy Mass in the vernacular  could take up this issue with the their bishops. 

The diocesan priests in Dijon who offer Holy Mass in French could ask Bishop Roland Minnerath to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so also the Creeds, Catechisms and extra ecclesiam nulla salus. 

Then there will not be doctrinal division with the past Magisterium at the Novus Ordo Mass.

Archbishop Arthur Roche when he was the bishop of Leeds, England, would not affirm the dogma EENS since he wanted to interpret  the BOD, BOB and I.I  with the fake premise, for political reasons. 

The same ruse is followed by Andrea Grillo and the professors at the Benedictine University of St. Anselm, Rome, when they attend Holy Mass in Italian.They have courses in liturgy, with academic degrees being given, which are approved by Archbishop Arthur Roche.-Lionel Andrades

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall have found the Specific Error in Vatican Council II.They now know what creates the New Theology and the break with Tradition.It is the False Premise.

There are no literal and visible cases of the Baptism of Desire said Bishop Athanasius Schneider.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall chose the Blue Left Hand Side  Rational Column. The Ecclesia Dei communities must do the same and demand that Bishop Roland Minnerath also interpret Vatican Council II with the rational column.

 

OCTOBER 1, 2021

Ecclesia Dei communities demand that Bishop Roland Minnerath be rational. With the Red Right Hand Side Column he and Pope Francis create official heresy. This is schism with the past Magisterium ( Graphics )                                                                                                                       

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/with-irrational-premise-of-red-right.html

In my parish the First Holy Communion classes are political and ideological

 

In my parish the First Holy Communion classes are political and ideological. They can go ahead politically since Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Fake and not Rational Premise. So the children are not taught that there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and in Heaven there are only Catholics. 

This is a break with the teaching of Catechism in the 16^th century in Rome, when the False Premise was not used to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). There were no exceptions for EENS.Since the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were not interpreted with the False Premise.Hypothetical cases were not confused as being objective and then inferred to be practical exceptions for the past exclusivist ecclesiology.-Lionel Andrades

https://it-it.facebook.com/pg/smnazaret/posts/

When Pope Francis says that we must ‘move forward’ this is possible only with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise. He is referring to the Irrational Premise. When he says that ‘we cannot go back to the past’, he is referring to the Rational Premise. It is with the Rational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II that we can, and have to, go back to the past.

 

When Pope Francis says that we must ‘move forward’ this is possible only with Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise. He is referring to the Irrational Premise. When he says that ‘we cannot go back to the past’, he is referring to the Rational Premise. It is with the Rational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II that we can, and have to, go back to the past. Since without the Fake Premise there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II for the Athanasius Creed etc. There is no development of doctrine. The liberalism ends with the Rational Premise. We cannot ‘go forward’. It is the Fake Premise which creates schism with the past Magisterium and which is a dishonest reasoning. It is not traditional Catholic philosophy and theology. -Lionel Andrades

It’s the premise which determines if you are orthodox or unorthodox, conservative or liberal.

 

It’s the old or new theology which determines your Catholic faith and the new theology depends upon a false premise and the old theology, a rational premise.

It’s the premise which determines if you are orthodox or unorthodox, conservative or liberal.

You may go for the Latin Mass as a liberal and the Novus Ordo Mass as a conservative.

In the 16^th century the lex orandi, lex credenda was shown at the Latin Mass, when they were not using the False Premise to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed etc. Today at the Latin and Novus Ordo Mass there is the lex orandi lex credendi with the congregation and priest using the False and not Rational Premise. So theology in general is new and liberal. -Lionel Andrades

Gesù aiutaci ad innamorarci della Preghiera e camminare con Tua Madre verso di Te che sei la Vita

With the Rational Premise we return to the lex orandi, lex credendi of the past

 

The lex orandi, lex credendi does not depend upon the Latin Mass. If you are using the False Premise at the Latin Mass, you are affirming the New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology etc. It’s the Fake or Rational Premise which in a subtle way determines the lex orandi, lex credendi. With the Rational Premise we return to the lex orandi, lex credendi of the past. -Lionel Andrades

There can be only one rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and it will take the Catholic Church back to the past.

 

Pope Francis may follow the Left ; the progressivists, but without the False Premise they all have to return to the old theology, and go back to the past.

There can be only one rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and it will take the Catholic Church back to the past.-Lionel Andrades

The present liberalism depends upon the False Premise which has been exposed. The New Theology has its foundation in the False Premise. So we are back to the old theology

 

We cannot go back to the past a bishop would say, but, really, we cannot stay in the present, or go to the future, since we do not have the theology any more to do so. The present liberalism depends upon the False Premise which has been exposed. The New Theology has its foundation in the False Premise. So we are back to the old theology.  -Lionel Andrades

SAN MICHELE ARCANGELO santuario di Sturno (Av)

Day 7 - St. Michael the Archangel Novena | 2022