Thursday, September 14, 2023
THE BIBLE CAME FROM THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
THE ADORATION CHAPEL THAT NEVER SLEEPS
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/the-adoration-chapel-that-never-sleeps
Pope Francis and Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez cannot interpret Vatican Council II irrationally instead of rationally and call it ‘the new Magisterium’.
Pope Francis and Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez cannot interpret Vatican Council II irrationally instead of rationally and call it ‘the new Magisterium’. This is heresy. It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries. It is also dishonest to interpret the Council irrationally to create a false break with Tradition. - Lionel Andrades
Archbishop Fernández claims opposition to Pope Francis’ ‘unique charism’ risks ‘heresy and schism’
SEPTEMBER 9, 2023
The discovery
The discovery
We have a discovery today. It’s ‘a small point’ but this small point turns the Council around. From liberalism the Council returns to Tradition. So by ignoring this small point, we have liberalism in the Church. This small point, is the premise: the rational and irrational premise. It decides if Vatican Council II has a continuity or break with Tradition. This is the discovery. We now have a switch. We can turn it off or on. We can choose a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors or a rupture with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
former Staff Reporter, daily Morning News, Karachi, Pakistan.
Recipient of the All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) Best Reporter of the Year Award, presented by the Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto.
Recipient of the Pakistan Government's Award for Literature ( Childrens stories).
Teacher of English and Church History at the Catholic Minor Seminary, Rawalpindi.
Bishop Anthony Lobo
Sent to Rome for Ministerial Priesthood by Bishop Anthony Lobo, bishop of Rawalpindi-Islamabad, Pakistan.
He is discriminated against by the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome.He interprets Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. So there is a continuity with Tradition. He is not allowed to study at pontifical universities in Rome, where it is obligatory to interpret Magisterial Documents, irrationally and unethically.Catholic students and seminarians are discriminated against.
The seminarians of the Society of St. Pius X, Albano, are allowed to study at the pontifical universities in Rome since they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and this is approved by the Left.
Propaganda Fide only gives schorlarship for all students/ seminarians who are approved by a bishop, who does not interpret Vatican Council II, rationally and expects seminarians to do the same.
However we have a new discovery in the Catholic Church. There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral, when it is interpreted rationally i.e LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases. So they are not objective examples of salvation. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.The Creeds must not be changed.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version of the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils, which is heretical, non-traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents and call it Catholic.
Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Balthazar, Kung, Lefebvre and Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. The popes from Paul VI to Francis did the same. We can today choose to interpret the Council rationally and in harmony with Tradition.
Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/
Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
Residence temporary : Missionaries of Charity (Contemplative) Men of Madre Teresa, Via di Sant’Agapito, 8, 00177 Roma RM ( near Largo Preneste and Termini) Italy.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
HEART OF THE MATTER
1.If Vatican Council II is a rupture with the dogma EENS then it means that LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So they are exceptions for EENS etc.
2. If Vatican Council II is not a break with the dogma EENS then it means that LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc refer to invisible cases. They are not visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2023. Invisible cases cannot be practical exceptions for me.So there is nothing in the text of Vatican Council II to contradict Feeneyite EENS.
A. Similarly if the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to physically visible cases, of salvation outside the Church in 1949-2023, then this is Cushingism. It is irrational. There is a break with the dogma EENS and the ecumenism of return.The Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q,27Q-outside the Church there is no salvation), has exceptions. There is a break with Tradition.
B. But if BOD, BOB and I.I refer to invisible cases, then they do not contradict EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the ecumenism of return and the Catechism of Pope Pius X(24Q,27Q).There is no rupture with Tradition.
- When what is invisible is considered invisible, I call it Feeneyism.
- When what is invisible is considered visible, I call it a Cushingism.
We can interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism or Cushingism.
We can interpret BOD, BOB and I.I with Feeneyism or Cushingism.
So we can interpret the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed with Feeneyism or Cushingism. When these Creeds refer to BOD, BOB and I.I they can be Feeneyite or Cushingite. For example, (Nicene Creed-I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin ( and not three known baptisms).
The Apostles Creed (the Holy Spirit guides the Holy Catholic Church to say outside the Church there is no salvation and not outside the Church there is known salvation.
All need Catholic faith for salvation (Athanasius Creed).This is Feeneyism. But if it is said all need Catholic faith for salvation with some known exceptions then this is Cushingism.
The only holy Catholic and Apostolic Church (Four Marks, Nicene Creed) in the past taught that outside the Church there is no salvation. What it teaches today depends upon you -if you are a Feeneyite or Cushingite.
In the same way there can two interpretations of Vatican Council II (LG 8,14,15,16 etc). It depends upon how you interpret LG 8 etc, with Feeneyism or Cushingism.
-Lionel Andrades
Sr. Mary Ephrem's Vision of Hell
Sr. Mary Ephrem's Vision
of Hell
The evening of the 24th of Feb. 1958, as I was composing myself to sleep I underwent a strange and horrifying experience.
As I was not yet
asleep I do not think it could have been a dream. It came suddenly without sign
or warning, and as such left an indelible impression on my mind and heart.
I found
myself on a lonely road one of course, I had never seen or been on at any time.
Before me was a large structure somethin similar to a giagantic cathedral or
castle. It was huge somber and forbiding. I was obliged to walk toward it,
though something inside of me held back in a kind of dread.Then at my side on
the right I felt the strong presence of St. Michael, he did not speak.
We continued on
our journey and at last came to what appeared to be the front enterance to the
strange building. As we drew nearer the two great doors which had the qualities
so it seemed of some sort of glass work, opened of themselves. I saw no one.
The interior revealed an odd indescribable darkness pervaded by a weird sort of
light, which was not really light. We entered and without looking back I knew
that doors had closed inexorably behind us, and that we would never leave the
same way we had entered.
When I said that
the light was not really light, I meant it was more like the distant glow of a
raging fire. What appeared to be openings in this vast and horrible place
looked more like huge windows, painted a vivid red, solid and impenetrable like
an un-breakable wall of fire. Yet they did not have the usual
accompaniments of fire, like flames or smoke. I felt the frightening
certinty of where we were. Just the same I could not help asking my companion,
"What is this place?" Gravely solemnly he replied, "This is
hell." He said this in a way I will never forget.
I wondered that
except for the red openings, there was no appearance of fire anywhere.
Answering these unvoiced thoughts my companion explained, "The fire is in
the souls of the lost, not an outward but an inword fire that never dies.
I did not see
these lost souls, but I knew thet they were all about us, and I thought of the
horror that was theirs and that it would never end.
The silence was
appaling, it was the silence of death without hope. As we continued our journey
there was not a breath of sound. The intense and penetrating silence, or rather
stillness was terrifying beyond description. Yet that very silence screamed
with the undying voice of despair, nothing nothing nothing, lost lost lost,
forever forever forever. I was filled with the most terrible fear that I would never
get out of this dreadful place. And Oh how I missed the light. When explaining
then to my companion,"But there is no light" he made answer,"How
can there be light where God is not" I kept begging St. Michael not to
leave me. Never have I experienced such fear such horror.
As we walked on we
came upon to what appeared to be a large body of water. It looked like an
enormous circular pool. It all but overflowed with some sort of dark substance.
What that was I do not know, but it was not water. I was too terror-struck to
investegate further. Lying about in a rather scattered manner were, what
appeared to be dead objects of some sort. We did not go close enough for me to
see just what they were.
I cannot
imagine anything worse or more horrible than what I felt and saw in this place.
I was told or at least I understood it, that this was the least part of eternal
punishment. What then must the rest be like? I understood that no one could
experience the full sight of hell and live.
When we left this
we came upon another aspect of eternal punishment which made a deep impression
on me. On what appeared to be a wide ledge on the side of a mountain, I saw
many many people going back and forth, searching and searching. They were
surrounded, engolfed in flames of fire. They seemed themselves to be a part of
the fire as though it came from within them. My companion then explained to me
that these were they who had no time for God while they lived upon earth. Now
they were condemmed to spend an eternity seeking Him whom they would never
find. An endless search wihout hope, without ever the joy of finding and
possessing. What a torture this must be! Oh the justice of God!
On the morning of Feb 20,1958,
during Holy Mass the thought of the lost ones, especially the chosen grieved
me. Then Our Lord appearing to me at that moment spoke these words to me:
"Beloved spouse I condemn no one, if a soul is condemned it has condemned
itself." And I knew in my heart this was so, though my eyes filled
with tears.
Sister Mary Ephrem and
The Prayer to the Indwelling Most Holy Trinity
I was suffering a
great deal for I was inconsolable at the thought of my own ingratitude and of
the crimes which sin commits against God. ... I couldn’t keep back the tears
though I am not one to give in emotionally.
This was something
different and impossible to explain. In the midst of it Our Lord said to me:
“Thou art
the daughter of My Heart. In thee My Heart is well pleased.”
But those words,
far from consoling me, made the tears flow more than before. I feel my
ingratitude all the more when He lavishes upon me such goodness and mercy.
Later, Our Lord spoke these words to me while I was praying for the
sanctification of the community I so dearly love.
“Thou shalt be the
light of the Community. Thou shalt follow in My Way and be blest forever.” ...
“Thou art a paradise wherein the Trinity takes its delight. My little
paradise, I thank thee for giving me shelter in thee.”
[She wrote
further...] We are, each one, His paradise, Father, and He takes so much
delight in dwelling in us. How sad, Father, that so few souls know this. And of
those who know, what a small number make use of it. What a mission is ours,
Father, to make souls conscious of God dwelling in them and live a life of
continual adoration. There is so much to be done, time is so short. Yet, what a
consolation to know that even in eternity we can continue this glorious work of
love.
Posts
