Lionel's blog
Amazon,Ignatius and numerous publishers are publishing books on Vatican Council II written by authors, who like Pope Benedict have used a false premise to project a liberal Vatican Council II which is a rupture with Tradition. - Lionel Andrades
The Judges of the secular courts, the Tribunals and Magistrates are all interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and no clarification is being issued by the Vatican.Even Cardinal Raymond Burke the former Head at the Supreme Tribunal( Signatura), Vatican, is still interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise. -Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria is not calling for a moratorium on the books of Pope Benedict /Cardinal Ratzinger, since they were all written with a false premise, and he,Cardinal Ladaria, followed the error in his writings. Pope Francis too wants to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the same false premise and he expects the whole Church to do the same. - Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Muller has documented and preserved Pope Benedict's books. In general they are written with a false premise to create a hermeneutic of rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be Catholic for salvation. This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths.
There is no denial or clarification from Pope Benedict or Cardinal Muller. This is not an ethics issue for them. They are supported by the Left and Ecclesiastical Masonry.
We have first class heresy with the use of a false premise in a superfical reading of Vatican Council II.- Lionel Andrades
Pope Benedict interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise to maintain the good life at the Vatican for him and others.
Then he produced a Catechism of the Catholic Church also interpreted with the same false premise.
His 'magisterial documents' and many books, which publishers re-print with this approval,are also written with the common error. He does not tell publishers to stopping printing his books. -Lionel Andrades
The Auxiliary Bishops and Cardinal-Vicar General at the Rome Vicariate and the Archbishops and cardinal of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, are not proclaiming the Faith. They are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to maintain an easy life in Rome. -Lionel Andrades
If Jimmy Akin and Louie Verrecchio did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II then the former would not contradict Tradition and reject it, supporting liberalism. The latter would not contradict Tradition, and then wrongly put the blame on Vatican Council II and not the false premise.
It's the false premise which creates the heremeneutic of rupture with Tradition (EENS etc) irrespective if you are a liberal or Lefebvrist.
Without the false premise and the rupture with Tradition, the present two popes, the SSPX bishops and priests, Michael Voris and the CMTV Staff and Cardinal Kasper and Cardinal Ladaria, would be affirming Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS. Ad Gentes 7 would be in harmony with EENS and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc would not be exceptions. There would be doctrinal unity. -Lionel Andrades
The Jesuits and Dominicans at the Pontifical Gregorian and Angelicum University, Rome have a comfortable life. They use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II so there is a rupture on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), as it was interpreted by St. Francis Xavier, St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Dominic. They are not persecuted in Italy by the Left. - Lionel Andrades
Posts
