A Judicial Vicar hides a dark secret
in the diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire. He used a False Premise to avoid
charges of being a Feeneyite and placed harsh prohibitions upon a religious
community which did not deny
being Feeneyite.
Fr.Georges de Laire Judicial Vicar for
the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA in a statement to the Catholic
Herald, U.K did not say that with the Rational Premise in the interpretation of
Vatican Council II, he would have to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)
like the St. Benedict Center, NH (SBC).Now he does not affirm EENS since he
uses an Irrational Premise. The Judicial Vicar in New Hampshire and the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith(CDF), Vatican, issued a Decree of Prohibitions and Precepts against the SBC.
The SBC interpret the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and
invincible ignorance (I.I), with the Rational Premise. So hypothetical and
speculative cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are not practical exceptions for
Feeneyite EENS. Also hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS
22 etc. in Vatican Council II, do not contradict the Athanasius Creed and the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, for the SBC.
So when Michael Voris visited New
Hampshire and called upon Fr. Laire for an interview for Church Militant, Laire
did not issue a statement saying that he affirmed Feeneyite EENS like the SBC.
He was unethically using the common False Premise.
Like Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect
of the CDF and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia op, the Assistant Secretary, CDF,
Fr. Laire has been using the Fake Premise to create a break with Tradition.
Since the religious community, the Slaves
of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St. Benedict Center, in Richmond, NH, refused to use the False Premise in the
interpretation of EENS, the diocese website called upon Catholics to avoid the
SBC chapel.
Fr.Georges de Laire also in a
statement to Damien Fischer a free-lance reporter in New Hampshire did not say
that with the Rational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, and
in particular the interpretation of BOD, BOB and I.I, all the religious
communities in the diocese could affirm Feeneyite EENS. This would be the only
rational choice available.
He did not correct the defamatory
reports of Simcha Fischer. He did not tell her and her husband Damien, that the
St. Benedict Center affirmed Vatican Council II, EENS and the Creeds and Catechisms
interpreted rationally. So they were not in schism with the past Magisterium.
It was the heretical and schismatic diocese in New Hampshire, which
interpreted the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II, at their
catechetical programs, with a False Premise. This created schism with the past
Magisterium. Practical exceptions were projected for EENS, the Athanasius Creed
etc. So with this irrationality the Syllabus of Errors and the traditional
ecumenism of return were made obsolete.
Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior at the
SBC, accepts Pope Francis as the pope and attends the Latin Mass, in harmony
with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church supported by Vatican
Council II, interpreted with a Rational Premise.
It is obligatory for Pope Francis and
Pope Benedict to accept Vatican Council II interpreted only rationally. They
presently accept only Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
The popes from Pius VI did not accept
Vatican Council II- interpreted with only a Rational Premise. Also Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret
Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and accept the traditional
conclusion. Instead they excommunicated him for not accepting Vatican Council
II (Irrational) as they did.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was not
informed. There is no denial from Andrea Torneilli or Fr.Antonio Spadaro sj.
All this was not known to Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops-neither Archbishop Fulton Sheen and
Cardinal Ottaviani, were aware of this.- Lionel Andrades
Posts
