Bishop Athanasius Schneider’s Catechism does not discuss the issue of Vatican Council II interpreted rationally or irrationally : It does not mention that there can be two versions of the Nicene Creed depending upon the interpretation of Vatican Council II, and the baptism of desire etc.

 

Bishop Athanasius Schneider’s Catechism does not discuss the issue of Vatican Council II interpreted rationally or irrationally. It does not discuss the baptism of desire as not being literal cases in the present time. It does not mention that there can be two versions of the Nicene Creed depending upon the interpretation of Vatican Council II, and the baptism of desire etc.

He does not affirm the Athanasius Creed. He is a Cushingite and not Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is the same with the popes and the SSPX bishops.

He supports Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre who interpreted Magisterial Documents with Cushingism and not Feeneyism. Schneider interprets Lumen Gentium 16 with Cushingism and I choose Feeneyism. So our conclusions will be different. He will be non traditional and I will be traditional.

This will be another politically correct and personal Catechism. It will be a re-interpretation of the Baltimore, Pius X and Trent’s Catechism irrationally, when they mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. For him these are physically visible cases and for me they are invisible.

If they were invisible cases for him then he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and this would be politically incorrect with the Left. It will also be opposed by the Lefebvrists, who will have to admit that Archbishop Lefebvre made an objective mistake on the Council and also the baptism of desire etc.

 Since Bishop Schneider accepts the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston which has made a factual mistake, he is affirming the liberal New Theology of Pope Benedict. That Letter confuses invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. This Catechism cannot be apostolic. It will interpret 29Q (invincible ignorance ) of the Catechism of Pope Pius X, irrationally.  - Lionel Andrades

Bishop Schneider publishes new catechism to defend ‘integrity of Catholic and apostolic doctrine’

https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/bishop-schneider-publishes-new-catechism-to-defend-integrity-of-catholic-and-apostolic-doctrine/?utm_source=most_recent&utm_campaign=usa

For me the Catholic Church is officially saying in Magisterial Documents, that outside the Church there is no salvation. Practically, we know we cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church. So there are no exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus mentioned in Vatican Council II and neither are there any known in practical life.

 

For me the Catholic Church is officially saying in Magisterial Documents, that outside the Church there is no salvation. Practically, we know we cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church. So there are no exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus mentioned in Vatican Council II and neither are there any known in practical life. - Lionel Andrades

Adoration at Medugorje 26.10.2023

 

https://marytv.tv/marytv-latest-videos/

Pope Francis’ interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational and so cannot be Magisterial. Nobody is denying it. We now know that the Council can be interpreted rationally.

 

Pope Francis’ interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational and so cannot be Magisterial. Nobody is denying it. We now know that the Council can be interpreted rationally. It will then be in harmony with the past Magisterium over the centuries. There is a choice.

The Bible, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II say outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. So we have a Vatican Council II which is Feeneyite.LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA ,2 GS 22 etc, are no more exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

So all the cardinals and bishops must interpret Vatican Council II magisterially. Presently they are irrational, non traditional and non-Magisterial. They are political but not Catholic on Vatican Council II. - Lionel Andrades