Signore liberaci dalla tentazione di non seguirti e di adattare la Tua Parola come ci conviene

We now have new information. It is a breakthrough.It is the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who will now be on the defensive, on Vatican Council II.

 Bishop Louis Tylka has refused to speak directly to representatives of the Catholic podcast and website Our Warpath , comservative lay members of his diocese in Peoria, Illinois, USA. 

Their March for Catholics, is to be held in Peoria, Illinois September 29th and 30th.Hosted  by Our Warpath it is designed to take a stand against heresy and watered-down Catholicism. It is organized to promote orthodoxy says the blog of the organisers.

Joe Rigi, president of Our Warpath, said the diocese heard the event was being held and banned them from the parishes and cathedral.

The issue is Vatican Council II. Rigi and the speakers of of the March for Catholics may not know this.

Cardinal Ratzinger, Ex- Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican interpreted the Council with an Irrational Premise. In this way he created exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla ssalus (EENS), Syllabus of Errors etc.So with the Athanasius Creed and the Catechisms obsolete he believed that the Church could change its teachings. This was the thinking since 1965 even before he was the Prefect of the CDF. So there followed 'the reforms' of Vatican Council II all based upon the Council interpreted with the Irrational Premise.

The laity in ignorance had to concede that Vatican Council II was  a break with Tradition.Even in  Peoria no one challenges the bishop on Vatican Council II.

We now have new information. It is a breakthrough.It is the popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who will now be on the defensive, on Vatican Council II.

We now know of a Vatican Council II (Rational).This is an ethical way of interpreting the Council. The Council when interpreted with a Rational Premise is not a break with the past ecclesiocentrism, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and Feeneyite EENS. There are no exceptions mentioned in the Council-text for the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.

So when we are back to the past ecclesiocentrism there are no also no exceptions for the past faith, morals and mission. We are back to the old moral theology and faith teachings. The new moral theology was based upon the Irrational Interpretation of the Council. Even the new Missal is based upon the Irrational Interpretation of Vatican Council II. The books published on the Council have their foundation on the False Premise. Pope Paul VI interpreted the Council with an Irrational and not Rational Premise.Now we have a choice. When the Council is interpreted rationally it supports the old theology and the pre-1962 Roman Missal.

So Bishop Louis Tylka must be asked to affirm Vatican Council II (Rational). 

Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to do the same.

It is unethical for them to continue to interpret the Council with the False Premise and then make innovations in faith and morals. 

Catholics in the diocese are free to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ethically. They are obligated to be honest and not use the False Premise of the bishop and the clergy.So orthodoxy must now be the norm in the diocese. Since the Council is orthodox.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.facebook.com/bshplou

Signore Gesù in questa preghiera ci apriamo a Te, alla Tua Misericordia ...

Signore Gesù apri gli occhi dei nostri cuori e aiutaci a rifiutare quello che non è degno di Te

Con questo incontro stasera Signore desideriamo creare nei nostri cuori lo spazio solo per Te