Medjugorje: November 2, 2019 Message to Mirjana…”My children, read the book of the Gospel…The Heavenly Father gave Himself through a human face, and this face is the face of my Son.”

 November 2, 2019 ryanmysticpost

“Dear children, my beloved Son always prayed and glorified the Heavenly Father. He always said everything to Him and trusted in His will. This is what you, my children, should also do, because the Heavenly Father always listens to His children. One heart in one heart – love, light and life. The Heavenly Father gave Himself through a human face, and this face is the face of my Son. You, apostles of my love, you should always carry the face of my Son in your hearts and your thoughts. You should always think of His love and His sacrifice. You should pray to always feel His presence, because, apostles of my love, that is the way for you to help all those who do not know my Son, who have not come to know His love. My children, read the book of the Gospel. It is always something new, it is what binds you to my Son who was born to bring the words of life to all of my children and to sacrifice Himself for all. Apostles of my love, carried by the love for my Son, bring love and peace to all of your brothers. Judge no one. Love everyone according to the love for my Son. In this way, you will also be caring for your soul, and it [your soul] is that what is most precious, which truly belongs to you. Thank you.”

Messaggio del 2 novembre 2019 - Medjugorje

When Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf offer Mass in Latin at the Santissma Trinita dei Pellegrini church in Rome,they do so with the approval of the local secular authorities in Rome.They have the approval of the Masonic lodges and the Vicariate

When Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf offer Mass in Latin at the Santissma Trinita dei Pellegrini church in Rome,they do so with the approval of the local secular authorities in Rome.They have the approval of the Masonic lodges and the Vicariate.

A priest who offers Holy Mass interpreting BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as not being physical bodies in Newton's concept of time and space ( the common reality of human beings) would not be allowed to offer Holy Mass at the FSSP  church in Rome.The Vicariate would not give him a letter of approval( incardination).

If he did not contradict the laws of Newton at the physical level of matter, it would be an impediment, to offering Holy Mass in Rome. The authorities would object.

So  Fr.John Zuhlsdorf meets the conditions  for offering Mass in Rome and so does Cardinal Raymond Burke.

For both of them BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are known 'physical bodies' in Newton's time and space.

Fr.Zuhlsdorf told Michael Sean Winters that he rejects Feeneyite EENS. For Fr. Z, Vatican Council II does not support Feeneyite EENS.

So there are no objections to Fr. Z in Rome.

According to Canon Law a juridical person must affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church to hold his position as Rector, Superior, Bishop etc.In the diocese of Madison, Wisconsin, USA, where Fr. Zuhlsdorf is the President of the Tridentine Rite Society,the bishops and priests, have to re-interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and the past ecclesiology, to remain in good standing with the Vatican and the Left.No one in Madison,  like in Italy, is allowed to affirm the strict interpretation of EENS according to Ad Gentes 7 and the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845, 846.

Cardinal Ratzinger changed Canon Laws so that EENS has to be interpreted with BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions.

They are obligated to pretend that there are arguments at the intellectual and subjective level, which are practical and visible examples of salvation outside the Church at the Newtonian level of space and matter.

So there emerges practical exceptions with this false reasoning, to Feeneyite EENS. This is the approved propaganda for a priest to remain in good standing with the ecclesiastics in the USA and Italy.-Lionel Andrades
https://wdtprs.com/2019/10/rome-day-27-birthday-memories/
https://wdtprs.com/2019/10/rome-day-26-old-friends-new-friends-dear-friends/

If you go for the Latin Mass know that the priest had to reject the Athanasius Creed ( Outside the Church there is no salvation), Catechism of Pope Pius X ( Outside the Church there is no salvation), Vatican Council II( All need faith and baptism for salvation-Ad Gentes 7), the Nicene Creed etc

So if you attended Mass in Latin yesterday All Saints Day, or on Sundays, know that the  priest was rejecting the Athanasius Creed ( Outside the Church there is no salvation), Catechism of Pope Pius X ( Outside the Church there is no salvation), Vatican Council II( All need faith and baptism for salvation-Ad Gentes 7), the Nicene Creed ( I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and not three or more known baptisms, which exclude the baptism of water).It is the same with the sedevacantists and traditionalists in Italy, at Mass in Latin.For them too, the police at Mass, 'theology -checkers',  expect the priest to say that the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I), with reference to extra ecclesiam nulla salus are exceptions. Similarly  LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are personally known people, saved outside the Church in 2019. They are 'living bodies' in  Newton's time and space, even though we cannot see any one of them.So Lumen Gentium is a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church and Vatican Council II contradicts 16th century EENS.

So remember this when you go for Mass at the FSSP church Trinita dei Pelligrini in Rome. I have written about this before and no one dares to contradict me and affirm the faith and Tradition.

A few Sundays back, I noticed young people at the Confessional, at an 'approved Latin Mass' in Rome.Do those young people know that to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the Nicene Creed is a mortal sin of faith?  It is a denial of Jesus and HIs Church.Only one mortal sin, according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994). is needed to take a person to Hell.A mortal sin is a mortal sin. We humans cannot really judge the three conditions for mortal sin, mentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

The approved priest at the approved Latin Mass  interprets Vatican Council II in the approved way.He projects unknown cases of LG 8 etc as being known examples of salvation outside the Church. So Lumen Gentium would artificially emerge as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

So  he is allowed to offer Holy Mass and all looks normal in church. Sin and sacrilege is officially approved.

The plains clothes policemen were not there to protect freedom of worship and religious beliefs but to maintain leftist values.

We know the Left is of Satan. There is no freedom to criticize abortion , gay marriages, concubinage, promiscuity etc for a priest, during  his sermon.

There would also have been police yesterday at the SSPX chapel near the Cavouor Metro Station in Rome, aside from the churches where Mass is generally offered in Italian and the Latin Mass is approved.-Lionel Andrades

When the Rome Vicariate allows a priest to offer the Latin Mass in the Extraordinary Form, the priest has to reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology, ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors, to be in mortal sins of faith and remian in sacrilege?

When the Rome Vicariate allows a priest to offer the Latin Mass in the Extraordinary Form, the priest has to reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology, ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors, to be in mortal sins of faith and remian in sacrilege?

The  Rome Vicariate works in coordination with the Jewish Left rabbis and the civil administration, which also enforce Leftist values on  Catholics.

So when a priest  offers Holy Mass in 2019  according to the rituals(rubrics) of the Traditional Latin Mass of the past, for example, he is obligated to encourage Catholics to believe that BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to living bodies in Newton's time and space, non Catholics saved outside the Church.In this way they become a rupture with Tradition.

In reality there are no such people in 2019.

It is only with this 'permit card' he is allowed to offer Holy Mass and so create an artifical rupture with the past ecclesiology and the teaching on there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades



BOD(Baptism of desire : the unknown case of a non Catholic saved outside the Church without the baptism of water and instead with the baptism of desire).
 BOB(Baptism of blood : the unknown case of a Catholic saved as a martyr but without the baptism of water.It is unknown so no one on earth could have seen the person in Heaven without the baptism of water).
I.I( Invincible ignorance : the unknown case of a non Catholic saved outside the Church in ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of his, and without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.

LG 8(Lumen Gentium 8: The unknown case of a non Catholic Catholic saved outside the Church with elements of sanctification and truth in other religions or with the true Church of Christ subsists outside its visible boundaries; some one saved without faith and baptism.)
 LG 14 ( Lume Gentium 14 : The unknown case of a non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church with the desire for the baptism of water, which he does not receive befoe dieing.Instead he saved with just this desire).
LG 16 ( Lumen Gentium 16 : The unknown case of a non Catholic saved without faith and baptism and instead in invincible ignorance or a good conscience).
UR 3 ( Unitatis Redintigratio 3 : The unknown case of a Christian saved outside the Catholic Church through 'imperfect salvation' which could only be known to God.
NA 2 ( Nostra Aetate 2: The unknown case of a non Catholic saved outside the Church through the good and holy things in other religions or that ' ray of Truth which enlightens all mankind'.)

The final Mass at the closing of the Amazon Synod did not have the same ecclesiology for the pope as that of the old Greek Mass in the first century.Similarly Pope Paul VI's personal ecclesiology at the first Mass in Italian, was a rupture with that of the Traditional Latin Mass in the 16th century.Neither of the two popes were offering the Mass of the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.

The final Mass at the closing of the Amazon Synod did not have the same ecclesiology for the pope as that of the old Greek Mass in the first century.Similarly Pope Paul VI's personal ecclesiology at the first Mass in Italian, was a rupture with that of the Traditional Latin Mass in the 16th century.Neither of the two popes were  offering the Mass of the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.However if I was present for Pope Francis or Pope Paul VI's Holy Mass, there would be no rupture , for me, with the old ecclesiology of the Church, at the Byzantine Greek or Tridentine Rite Mass. Since I would avoid the mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) which rejected the traditional theology of the Catholic Church.

 LOHO  supported a hermeneutic of rupture by re-interpreting, the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). 

Then Vatican Council II followed and supported the hermeneutic of rupture. LG 8 etc were projected as a rupture with Tradition. In other words, they were physical bodies in present time and space.Otherwise how could they be exceptions or relevant to the past ecclesiology and EENS. This is a mistake made today also by the traditionalists who attend Mass in only Latin.This is also the Vatican Council II of the liberals.

But not for me.

For me BOD, BOB and I.I like LG 8 etc support a hermeneutic of continuity with the past ecclesiology,and ecumenism of return.Vatican Council II is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.
Hypothetical cases cannot be a rupture with Tradition.They are not 'physical bodies' in time and space.

For me Mass in all rites is a continuity with the Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century or the Mass which St. Paul attended, when he told the Early Catholics not to receive the Eucharist unworthily.-Lionel Andrades

Pope Benedict and Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke offer Holy Mass in Italian and Latin not as a continuation with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the old Greek Mass which preceded the Latin Mass.It's a rupture.There is no comment from the Una Voce International or the Latin Mass Societies all over the world.

Pope Benedict  and Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke offer Holy Mass in Italian and Latin not as a continuation with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the old Greek Mass  which preceded the Latin Mass.It's a rupture.There is no comment from the Una Voce International  or the Latin Mass Societies all over the world.There is no Working Paper issued by Dr. Joseph Shaw.

For me the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB)  and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not real people in 2019 so they are not exceptioins to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old ecclesiology. For  Pope Benedict and Cardinal Burke BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions. So they imply that unknown and invisible non Catholics are objective exceptions to Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc) So in this way they create a rupture with Tradition.

Dr.Joseph Shaw, John Lamont, Thomas Pink, John Rao and other Catholic professors in the United Kingdom, intepret LG 8 etc as examples of non Catholics who contradict Newton's Laws of Physics in 2019.

With this error which creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition, Una Voce and the Latin Mass Societies are approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine fo the Faith and the liberal bishops in the U.K.

They offer Mass in England supporting the New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism and New Evangelisation .

Mass in all rites is not a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church. Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.It supports exclusive salvation in the Church.The Summorum Pontificum conferences support the New Ecclesiology with rituals of the old Mass. Without Feeneyite EENS there is no continuation with the popes and saints.There is no Catholic identity.-Lionel Andrades

Prof. Stephen Bullivant, Dr. Joseph Shaw and Enrico Maria Radaelli do not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS : Iota Unum talks

 

For me Holy Mass in all rites and liturgies is a continuation of the past ecclesiology of the Latin and Greek Mass. But it is a rupture  for most Catholics.For me the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not real people , physical bodies in time and space.LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not examples of non Catholics who contradict Newton's Laws of physics and exist in time and space. These are invisible and hypothetical cases only.They do not exist in time and space in 2019.

For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not examples of salvation outside the Church since I cannot physically see or meet any one saved. People who are saved are in Heaven and not on earth.This is a common observation. It is not some personal argument.

So whatever are the arguments supporting the New Theology, New Ecumenism and New Evangelisation they are meaningless.Since there can be no practical exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).There can be no physical exceptions to EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.

So the Novus Ordo Mass or Mass in the Syro Malabar Rite, in Rome is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.It supports exclusive salvation  in the Church. Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and this is ecclesiocentric.BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc are not practical exceptions to Ad Gentes 7.Neither do they contradict the dogma EENS, Feeneyite EENS.

But this is not how  Prof. Stephen Bullivant, Dr. Joseph Shaw interpets Vatican Council II and EENS. Nor was this the way Romano Amerio the author of Iota Unam saw magisterial documents.The student of Amerio,  Enrico Maria Radaelli also does not interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.-Lionel Andrades

 http://www.lmschairman.org/2019/10/prof-stephen-bullivant-at-iota-unum.html

Nigel Farage launches Brexit Party's general election campaign

Ero un cristiano che non aveva tempo ma a Medjugorje...

2 Novembre. Il "giorno dei morti": ecco come pregare per i defunti

 

 



Riccardo Maccioni giovedì 31 ottobre 2019

Il Purgatorio verità di fede "spiegata" dal Catechismo. Da Turoldo a Tagore e sant'Ambrogio: così santi, mistici e poeti pregano per il loro cari 

  
 Continua
  https://www.avvenire.it/chiesa/pagine/come-pregare-per-i-defunti  


Il mese di novembre è tradizionalmente legato alla commemorazione dei defunti. Anche chi non è solito frequentarli durante il resto dell’anno, va al cimitero, prega con più intensità per i cari già passati all’altra vita, programma Messe in loro suffragio. Succede soprattutto il 2 novembre, non a caso nella dicitura popolare il “giorno dei morti”. In realtà la Chiesa ricorda in ogni Eucaristia chi ci ha già preceduti nell’incontro con il Signore ma in questo periodo la loro memoria è più forte e sentita.