A Feeneyite is someone who does not use the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I). He accepts the BOD and I.I as being hypothetical only.This is the Rational Premise.
So he does not reject the possibility of God choosing to save someone with BOD or I.I or the possibility of there being only Catholics in Heaven. However he does not project hypothetical cases of BOD and I.I as being practical exceptions for the 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Jesuits, which had no exceptions. Invisible people cannot be visible exceptions for EENS according to St. Ignatius of Loyola and St. Robert Bellarmine.
Fr.Leonard Feeney was in harmony with St. Francis Xavier and St. Thomas Aquinas on EENS.
Vatican Council II says Catholics are the new people of God (Nostra Aetate 4), they are the new elect. In Heaven there are only Catholics who are there with Catholic faith and the baptism of water (Ad Gentes 7, Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 Outside the Church No Salvation).Salvation in potential is open for all but to receive this salvation all need to be Catholic, all need to enter the Catholic Church (Dominus Iesus 20, Pope John Paul II).
A Feneeyite is someone who does not project unknown cases of the baptism of desire etc as being known exceptions in the present times for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athnasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc. A Cushingite is someone who projects unknown cases of the BOD and I.I etc, as being known exceptions for the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and the past ecclesiocentrism.
The Superior Generals of the Ecclesia Dei communities are all Cushingites.
Cushingism creates a break with Tradition. It creates heresy and schism and mortal sins.The New Theology is Cushingite it depends upon the False Premise. The Ecclesia Dei communities intepret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, with the False Premise, with the New Theology.Then they blame Vatican Council II in general and in ignorance, and not their false premise.
On the blog 1Peter 5 Timothy Flanders wants to 'unite the clans' with Cushingism, with Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise to produce a false rupture with Tradition, which can be avoided.The Ecclesia Dei communities and the blog 1Peter 5 are united with the liberals and the Masons in their interpretation of Vatican Council II with the same False Premise.
If he uses the Rational Premise as a Feeneyite he will be persecuted. So like Peter Kwasniewski and Roberto dei Mattei they interpret Magisterial Documents with a False Premise and avoid being Feeneyites.-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 16, 2022
Pope Francis and the Ecclesia Dei communities in France, have chosen the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so there is heresy, schism and mortal sins at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass. This is an abjuration of the Faith.The Courtalain communique supports the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II in Traditionis Custode.
Pope Francis and the Ecclesia Dei communities in France, have chosen the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so there is heresy, schism and mortal sins at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass. This is an abjuration of the Faith.The Courtalain communique supports the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II in Traditionis Custode.
I can interpret Magisterial Documents without the common False Premise and can choose the Rational Premise.
Like Pope Francis in Traditionis Custode and the Ecclesia Dei communities in France in public supported the same abjuration of the Catholic Faith. At Courtalain,France they interpreted Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.They did not announce that the choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.With the False Premise they create schism and mortal sins of faith. In public they are denying Tradition for political reasons.They agree with Pope Francis’ interpretation of Vatican Council II in Traditionis Custode.He too like the popes from Paul VI interprets Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Nicene and Athanasius Creed and Catechisms with the common False Premise.
I mentioned in a previous blog post how mortal sins of faith, first class heresy and schism with the past Magisterium is created with the False Premise.
1.Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise (invisible people are visible in 1965-2021) creates alleged practical exceptions for the 2.Athanasius Creed ( all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation from Hell), 3.changes the Nicene Creed ( I believe in three or more known and visible baptisms which exclude the baptism of water and so are practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS).With the exceptions there is 4.a new version of ecumenism and a rejection of the ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church of the Syllabus of Errors. The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are interpreted with the False Premise as in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and so 5.there is a rupture with Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Church no more teaches outside the Church there is no salvation for the Ecclesia Dei communities and the 6.Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q, 27Q) is obsolete. If they used the Rational Premise ( invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 are always invisible), they would have to affirm the strict interpretation of EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors in public and then Pope Francis and the political Left would go after them. Now with the False Premise they interpret Vatican Council II like the Masons.
They have abjured and so the Left permits them to be legal, to collect funds and have financial projects. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 15, 2022
Posts
