Sunday, October 25, 2020

The Traditional Latin Mass was allowed to be offered at the church Santissimo Trinita dei Pelligrini on October 24 (Saturday) since Cardinal Raymond Burke interprets Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms with the false premise instead of without it

 

 




The Traditional Latin Mass was allowed to be offered  at the church Santissimo Trinita dei Pelligrini on October 24 (Saturday) since Cardinal Raymond Burke interprets Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms with the false premise instead of without it.
If he chose to interpret the Council without the false premise then there would be no rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS in the Council text. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc would not be a problem. They would refer to speculative and theoretical cases only.
But this would be politically unacceptable for the Left in Rome. 
So Cardinal Burke and the FSSP affirm the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance with a false premise, instead of without it and so there is a rupture with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors) and so they are allowed, by the Vatican and the Left, to offer the Latin Mass with the rubrics and vestments but without the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades

http://blog.messainlatino.it/2020/10/roma-pontificale-del-card-burke-trinita.html




Feast of Christ the King:. SSPX Ireland rejects EENS (with no exceptions) which was the theological basis for the proclaimation of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State

Traditionalists de throne Christ as King when they use a false premise to interpret Magisterial texts and create exceptions to the dogma EENS ( with no exceptions).With this error liberalism is created which asks why should there be traditional Mission when there is known salvation outside the Church and why proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King when non Catholics can be saved outside the Church ?

 

Twenty eight Jesuit universities in the USA are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a false rupture with EENS as it was known to the Jesuits since the Middle Ages : the past Jesuits were missionaries. The present ones are Cushingite and heretics in schism with the past popes and the past Jesuits

Matteo Salvini does not know theology like most Catholics.So they are easily fooled.If Salvini understood, then he could ask Pope Francis how could LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II be objective exceptions to the past popes and the historical 'triumphalism' of the Catholic Church in Italy ? How can there be a new culture with new salvation doctrines and a new ecclesiology created with a false premise ; created by confusing what is invisible as being visible ? Where are the cases of non Catholic being saved outside the Church ? Salvini and the Orthodox Jews, who oppose abortion and homosexuality, are not allowed to meet the pope

 Matteo Salvini does not know theology like most Catholics.So they are easily fooled.If Salvini understood, then he could ask Pope Francis how could LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II be objective exceptions to the past popes and the historical 'triumphalism' of the Catholic Church in Italy ? How can there be a new culture with new salvation doctrines and a new ecclesiology created with a false premise ; created by confusing what is invisible as being visible ? Where are the cases of non Catholic being saved outside the Church ?

Salvini and the Orthodox Jews, who oppose abortion and homosexuality, are not allowed to meet the pope.. -Lionel Andrades

The priests in Rome who offer the Byzantine Greek Mass also interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise. They are following the new ecclesiology based upon the irrational premise.So there is a rupture with the traditional exclusivist salvation theology of the Church Fathers and the Apostles

 The priests in Rome who offer the Byzantine Greek Mass  also interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise. They are following the new ecclesiology based upon the irrational premise.So there is a rupture with the traditional exclusivist salvation theology of the Church Fathers and the Apostles. -Lionel Andrades

Every Catholic Should Know: How The Apostles Died

 

Every Catholic Should Know: How The Apostles Died

1. Matthew. Suffered martyrdom in Ethiopia, Killed by a sword wound.

2. Mark. Died in Alexandria, Egypt , after being dragged by Horses through the streets until he was dead.

3. Luke. Was hanged in Greece as a result of his tremendous Preaching to the lost.

4. John. Faced martyrdom when he was boiled in huge Basin of boiling oil during a wave of persecution In Rome. However, he was miraculously delivered From death.
John was then sentenced to the mines on the prison Island of Patmos. He wrote his prophetic Book of Revelation on Patmos . The apostle John was later freed and returned to serve As Bishop of Edessa in modern Turkey . He died as an old man, the only apostle to die peacefully

5. Peter. He was crucified upside down on an x shaped cross. According to church tradition it was because he told his tormentors that he felt unworthy to die In the same way that Jesus Christ had died.

6. James. The leader of the church in Jerusalem , was thrown over a hundred feet down from the southeast pinnacle of the Temple when he refused to deny his faith in Christ. When they discovered that he survived the fall, his enemies beat James to death with a fuller's club.

This was the same pinnacle where Satan had taken Jesus during the Temptation.

7. James the Son of Zebedee was a fisherman by trade when Jesus Called him to a lifetime of ministry.

As a strong leader of the church, James was beheaded at Jerusalem. The Roman officer who guarded James watched amazed as James defended his faith at his trial.

Later, the officer Walked beside James to the place of execution. Overcome by conviction, he declared his new faith to the judge and Knelt beside James to accept beheading as a Christian.

8. Bartholomew. Also known as Nathaniel. He Was a missionary to Asia. He witnessed for our Lord in present day Turkey. Bartholomew was martyred for his preaching in Armenia where he was flayed to death by a whip.

9. Andrew. He Was crucified on an x-shaped cross in Patras, Greece. After being whipped severely by seven soldiers they tied his body to the cross with cords to prolong his agony.

His followers reported that, when he was led toward the cross, Andrew saluted it in these words, "I have long desired and expected this happy hour. The cross has been consecrated by the body of Christ hanging on it". He continued to preach to his tormentors For two days until he expired.

10. Thomas. He Was stabbed with a spear in India during one of his missionary trips to establish the church in the Subcontinent.

11. Jude. He Was killed with arrows when he refused to deny his faith in Christ.

12. Matthias. The apostle chosen to replace the traitor Judas Iscariot. He was stoned and then beheaded.

13. Paul. He Was tortured and then beheaded by the evil Emperor Nero at Rome in A.D. 67. Paul endured a lengthy imprisonment, which allowed him to write his many epistles to the churches he had formed throughout the Roman Empire. These letters, which taught many of the foundational Doctrines of Christianity, form a large portion of the New Testament.
https://gloria.tv/post/fkNh4hTKVhAE6xArQXwCNH4CE

Cushingism sees hypothetical cases as being non hypothetical in Newton's time and space. The result is a new false theology and a new false physics.With Cushingism Pope Benedict creates for himself what he calls the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition

 Cushingism sees hypothetical cases as being non hypothetical in Newton's time and space. The result is a new false theology and a new false physics.With Cushingism Pope Benedict creates for himself what he calls the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades

Amazon, Oxford, Ignatius and Angelus Press are probably working on another book on Vatican Council II interpreted with the common fake premise,inference and non traditional conclusion

 Amazon, Oxford, Ignatius and Angelus Press are probably working on another book on Vatican Council II interpreted with the common fake premise,inference and non traditional conclusion. -Lionel Andrades

Feeneyism is to see hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical.When Vatican Council II is not interpreted with Feeneyism a Catholic does not have an identity

 Feeneyism is to see hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical.When Vatican Council II is not interpreted  with Feeneyism a Catholic does not have an identity. - Lionel Andrades

Fr.Charles Curran's books are being promoted at the front display window of the Daughters of St. Paul book shop, near the Vatican. Curran considers hypothetical cases, which exist only in his mind, as being objective exceptions to the old moral law. He promotes imaginary scenarios and then makes believe that they are real. Catholics living in sin find it useful. They need to believe that Curran is correct and that the unknown exception contradicts the Biblical rule which indicates they are on the way to Hell

 Fr.Charles Curran's books are being promoted at the front display window of the Daughters of St. Paul book shop, near the Vatican.

Curran considers hypothetical cases, which exist only in his mind,as objective exceptions to the old moral law.

He promotes imaginary scenarios and then makes believe that they are real.

Catholics living in sin find it useful. They need to believe that Curran is correct and that the unknown exception contradicts the Biblical rule which indicates they are on the way to Hell. -Lionel Andrades

John Allen Jr.,Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters have no comment on Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise . It's a subject they do not want to write about

 John Allen Jr.,Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters have no comment on Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise . It's a subject they do not want to write about. -Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Kasper, Archbishop Bruno Forte and Bishop Marcello Semeraro's books on Ecclesiology could be thrown out.They generally use a false premise to create a new theology , a new ecclesiology. Their books promote the familiar ' development of doctrine based upon a false premise'. These books are Recommended Reading at Ecclesiology semesters at Pontifical Universities.They are approved by Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican

 Cardinal Kasper, Archbishop Bruno Forte  and Bishop Marcello Semeraro's books on Ecclesiology could be thrown out.They generally use a false premise to create a new theology , a new ecclesiology.

Their books promote the familiar ' development of doctrine based upon a false premise'. These books are Recommended Reading at Ecclesiology semesters at Pontifical Universities.They are approved by Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. -Lionel Andrades

Queste apparizioni a Medjugorje sono un dono per l'umanità che ha bisog...

Rad Trad Fr. Dwight Longenecker would know that if he did not use the fake premise to interpret Vatican Counci II he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS like the St. Benedict Center in the USA

 

Rad Trad Fr. Dwight Longenecker would know that if he did not use the fake premise to interpret Vatican Counci II  he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS like the St. Benedict Center in the USA. -Lionel Andrades

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II exist only in our mind. There are no objective cases in October 2020

 LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II exist only in our mind. There are no objective cases in October 2020. -Lionel Andrades

Comboni Missionaries are being forced to do Mission based upon a false interpretation of Vatican Council II. Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is in harmony with the salvation theology of the founder of their community

 


Jim Russel used the false premise to interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same. CMTV is Cushingite on Vatican Council II.They are not Feeneyite on the Council. May be they have to assure the Archbishop of Detroit and the USCCB that they interpret Magisterial documents ( Creeds and Catechisms) with the false premise.In this way they create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and so remain politically correct

 Jim Russel used the false premise to interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same.

CMTV is Cushingite on Vatican Council II.They are not  Feeneyite on the Council.

May be they have to assure the Archbishop of Detroit and the USCCB that they interpret Magisterial documents ( Creeds and Catechisms) with the false premise.In this way they create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and so remain politically correct. -Lionel Andrades

Jim Russell and Michael Voris interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) and Vatican Council II with a false premise and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same. If they did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and LOHO , there would be no rupture with Feeneyite EENS. Vatican Council II really supports the strict interpretation of EENS when the false premise is not used to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc

 Jim Russell and Michael Voris interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO)  and Vatican Council II with a false premise and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same. If they did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and LOHO , there would be no rupture with Feeneyite EENS. Vatican Council II really supports the strict interpretation of EENS when the false premise is not used to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. -:Lionel Andrades

APRIL 24, 2019



Jim Russell on Church Militant TV does not refer to hundreds of reports on line saying there are no practical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. : St. Benedict Center's theological position

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/jim-russell-does-refer-to-hundreds-of.html






 

 


No speaker has been invited to the Annual Cushingite Catholic Identity Conference, who interprets Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference. The Lefebvrist model approved by the Left is the norm. Their theology is Cushingite like that of the liberals

 No speaker has been invited to the Annual Cushingite Catholic Identity Conference, who interprets Vatican Council II  without the false premise and inference. The Lefebvrist model approved by the Left is the norm. Their theology is Cushingite like that of the liberals. -Lionel Andrades

All the speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference organised by Michael Matt are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to avoid Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus opposed by the Left and the Vatican .This is a Cushingite Identiy Conference and not a Catholic Identity Conference. They are intentionally projecting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and so that they can have these conferences.

All the speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference organised by Michael Matt are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise to avoid Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus opposed by the Left and the Vatican .This is a Cushingite Identiy Conference and not a Catholic Identity Conference. They are intentionally projecting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and so that they can have these conferences. -Lionel Andrades

Yesterday the congregation at Holy Mass in Italian had to respond to the Profession of Faith in a questiona and answer form. I responded like every one else knowing that the priests, religious community and lay people there, interpreted the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II with Cushingism and I interpret them with Feeneyism.So our doctrines and theology are different. Cushingism assumes hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc are non hypothetical and objective in the present times( 1965-2020). So objective exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church emerge. Feeneyism recognises that hypothetical and invisible cases are just that. So there are no objective exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc. So our Profession of Faith is different on the Nicene Creed, Apostles Creed, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of Pope Pius X, Catechism of the Council of Trent, Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994), Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance etc

 Yesterday the congregation at Holy Mass in Italian  had to respond to the Profession of Faith in a questiona and answer form. I responded like every one else knowing that the priests, religious community and lay people there, interpreted the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II with Cushingism and I interpret them with Feeneyism.So our doctrines and theology are different.

Cushingism assumes hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc are non hypothetical and objective in the present times( 1965-2020). So objective exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church emerge.

Feeneyism recognises that hypothetical and invisible cases are just that. So there are no objective exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc.

So our Profession of Faith is different on the Nicene Creed, Apostles Creed, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of Pope Pius X, Catechism of the Council of Trent, Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994), Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance etc. -Lionel Andrades

Without Christ they are all going to the fires of Hell. There is no known Anonymous Christian who will be saved outside the Church.There are no known exceptions to John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc.

It is good to stay with Sacred Tradition since the present 'magisterium' differs from the past Magisterium on extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( without known exceptions), the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, Catechism of Pope Pius X... In the past the Magisterium did not use a false premise to interpret Church documents and so create an artificial rupture with Tradition ( Catechism of the Council of Trent etc )

 It is good to stay with Sacred Tradition since the present 'magisterium' differs from the past Magisterium on extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( without known exceptions), the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, Catechism of Pope Pius X...

In the past the Magisterium did not use a false premise to interpret Church documents and so create an artificial rupture with Tradition ( Catechism of the Council of Trent etc ). -Lionel Andrades

Adorazione Eucaristica - Medjugorje 22 ottobre 2020