Saturday, September 23, 2023
Ursula von der Leyden who has been accused of plagiarism in the past is now interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically and there is no denial from Alberto Melloni, Secretary of the FSCIRE (Bologna School) and neither from the Cardinal-Archbishop of Bologna, Matteo Zuppi
Ursula von der Leyden who has
been accused of plagiarism in the past is now interpreting Vatican Council II
irrationally and unethically and there is no denial from Alberto Melloni,
Secretary of the FSCIRE (Bologna School) and neither from the Cardinal-Archbishop
of Bologna, Matteo Zuppi.
Leyden who has
worked for building a new jurist system in Italy, is choosing to interpret
Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and non traditional
conclusion. We have a rational choice which she, Alberto Melloni and Cardinal
Zuppi avoid.
Their deceptive
and political interpretation of Vatican Council II is being taught in the
schools in Italy, Germany etc.
The German government has approved educational grants for students to study at the FSCIRE, where Melloni is responsible for the scientific and administrative direction. Since the Council is interpreted irrationally they also change the understanding of the Catholic Creeds, Councils, Catechisms and other Magisterial Documents.
The President of
the European Union, Leyden, like Pope Francis has chosen the irrational
and not rational interpretation to dishonestly produce a fake break with
Catholic Tradition. There is no denial from the representatives of the FSCIRE
who have been informed.
LEGA SALVINI
The Lega Salvini
political party, could take up this issue in the Italian Parliament. This
is a big problem in the Catholic Church. A Catholic priest cannot get
incardinated at the Rome Vicariate unless he interprets Vatican Council II
irrationally like Leyden. Catholic seminarians cannot study at the pontifical
universities unless they fake it on Vatican Council II.
With the rational
interpretation of Vatican Council II, Leyden would have to say that all need
faith and baptism for salvation from Hell (AG 7 etc) and outside the Church
there is no salvation (CCC 846) and that LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, being
hypothetical and invisible cases, in 1965-2023, do not contradict AG 7, CCC 846
and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Fr. Matteo Zuppi ,
now cardinal, as Parish Priest at the basilica in Trastevere, Rome, many years
back, told me he did not accept the dogma EENS, since obviously for him , visible cases of LG 8 etc are exceptions for EENS. Physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church
are practical
exceptions for EENS, for the
cardinal. This is his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.For him there are visible exceptions for AG 7 and traditional EENS.
Today all the Jurists at the Vatican Courts, are interpreting the Council irrationally. - Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 20, 2023
Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez is making a philosophical error on Vatican Council II. The original error is not theology
SEPTEMBER 20, 2023
Proclaiming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is important in preaching, otherwise we are back to Vatican Council II (irrational), which separates Jesus from the Church by creating exceptions for the dogma EENS
Immaculée Ilibagiza: How meditating on Our Lady's Sorrow heals my sorrows
Immaculée Ilibagiza: How meditating on Our Lady's Sorrow heals my sorrowsws
The John-Henry Weste
https://www.lifesitenews.com/episodes/immaculee-ilibagiza-how-meditating-on-our-ladys-sorrow-heals-my-sorrows/?utm_source=featured_video&utm_campaign=usa
Posts
