A pope who says hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , the past exclusivist ecclesiology , an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed etc is heretical.
For me as a Catholic, the present two popes and the ecclesiastics of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are heretics.They need to recant.They do not deny what I keep writing.
They do not announce :-
1.Invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not visible exceptions to EENS.
2.Invisible and hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not objective exceptions to the dogma EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.
Instead the present popes are politically correct with the Left and Satan.Vatican Council II(Cushingite) is heretical. Cushingism results in modernism. Cushingism causes the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) was heretical.So the Left wanted him excommunicated.
Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct. There are not literal cases of the baptism of desire etc for them to be exceptions to EENS.The Left wanted him excommunicated.
Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc). Cardinal Ratzinger did not affirm this. So the Left did not oppose him.
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS and the past ecclesiology. Since the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) does not affirm this , in potential, they can still receive canonical status by accepting the official Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).
Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and EENS ( Feeneyite) are not a rupture with magisterial documents for Brother Andre Marie MICM,Prior at the St. Benedict Center, N.H.Since he affirms both, he may not be legally recognized as a Catholic, by the Left and the Vatican.
-Lionel Andrades
MAY 25, 2019
A possibility in Vatican Council II cannot be put forward as an exception to EENS. This was the error Pope Francis made on the plane when returning from Abu Dhabi
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/a-possibility-in-vatican-council-ii.html
MAY 30, 2019
UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/ur-3-does-not-contradict-passage-from.html
MAY 27, 2019
An examination of conscienceMAY 26, 2019
Mortal sins of faith
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith.html
MAY 24, 2019
Bishop Schneider did not announce that the interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Francis on the flight from Abu Dhabi was heretical
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-schneider-did-not-announce-that.html
MAY 24, 2019
Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria supported a theology of religions ! This is heresy
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/pope-benedict-and-cardinal-luiz-ladaria.html
MAY 22, 2019
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has accepted the new moral theology and so he cannot call a holder or supporter of heresy, a heretic
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has.html
MAY 22, 2019
The Baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS since it does not exist in our reality. This was known to the popes and saints. So the Feeneyite affirms the baptism of desire, he does not reject it. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-baptism-of-desire-is-not-exception.html
MAY 21, 2019
Bishop Athanasius Schneider is a theological liberal on faith and morals. He applies the New Theology to faith and morals.He overlooks manifest heresy on faith-issues which can be read on line and he also overlooks mortal sin manifested in repeated pastoral expression which was documented in the Open Letter to the Bishops by some 19 original signatories
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-is.html
MAY 20, 2019
Europe's Christian political parties still do not affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King and the separation of Satanic secularism and state
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/europe-elects-far-right-parties-unite.html
MAY 20, 2019
St. Ambrose could not state it 'as a fact' that it happened since if it would happen it could only be known to God as a fact. This is the nature of the baptism of desire.It simply does not exist in our reality
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/boniface-ambrose-could-not-state-it-as.html
MAY 18, 2019
If the pope can change his mind on Medugorje he can also announce the obvious- he could say that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to personally unknown and invisible people
________________________________________________________________________________
Posts
