Cardinal Ladaria interprets the First Commandment, Great
Commission, the Creeds, all the Catechisms and Vatican Council II with
irrational Cushingism. I choose rational Feeneyism.
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, has, along with the Diocese of Manchester, USA, issued a political-left Decree of Prohibitions, against the St. Benedict Center(SBC) in New Hampshire, USA.He issued the harsh Decree, since the SBC does not interpret the Catechism of the Catholic
Church (847-848 on invincible ignorance) irrationally, like him. The CDF also expects the
SBC to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart
of Mary at the SBC in NH, interpret Vatican Council II and the CCC rationally. They do not confuse invisible cases of LG 14 and 16 as being visible people in
the present times.
But with the irrationality, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, like the
present two popes, changes the understanding of the First Commandment.
When what is invisible is mistaken as being visible, I call it
Cushingism. When what is invisible is seen as being just invisible, I call it
Feeneyism.
Cardinal Ladaria and the present two popes interpret the First
Commandment, the Great Commission, the Creeds, all the Catechisms and Vatican
Council II with irrational Cushingism.
So for political-Left reasons Cardinal Ladaria and Pope Francis
do not affirm the dogma EENS (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence, 1442) since
they irrationally interpret Vatican Council II. So there is a break with EENS. They
reject the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS.
They are also changing the understanding of the First Commandment
by suggesting there is true worship outside the Catholic Church. The First
Commandment says, ‘I am the Lord your God. You shall have no other God beside
me’.
Catholics believe in One God, in Three Persons, who is Yahweh,
the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. This is the God of the Old and New
Testament of the Bible. This is the God of the New Revelation of the New Testament.
So it is only in Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, through whose Death and Resurrection
we have the only means of salvation chosen by God the Father (CCC 845) in these
end times. Salvation is open for all but to receive this salvation all need to be Catholic ( Dominus Iesus).Jesus has died for all but to receive the Sacrifice of Jesus, all must accept Him in the Catholic Church.
Catholics, the only people of God (Nostra Aetate 4, Vatican
Council II), the new Chosen People (NA 4, AG 7), through their faith and the
baptism of water (CCC 1257), have received the eternal and final, covenant of Jesus Christ
made through his Sacrifice on the Cross.The Church knows of no means to eternal salvation other than the baptism of water (CCC 1257).
Catholics have replaced the sacrifice of the Jews at the
Consecration during Holy Mass. The ark of the covenant of the Jews is present in the Eucharist, in the tabernacle. The church is the new synagogue. At church is the presence
of the Jewish Messiah promised by the Jewish prophets.The New Testament is a continuation of the Old Testament.The Catholic Church is the continuation of the Jewish religion.
So outside Jesus and His Mystical Body the Catholic Church there
is no salvation. Jesus cannot be separated from the Catholic Church (Dominus
Iesus) and the Church cannot be separated from the Kingdom of God (Dominus
Iesus of Pope John Paul II).
So only in the Catholic Church is there true worship. All are
oriented to Jesus in the Catholic Church (CDF, Notification, Fr. Jacques Dupuis
sj, 2001), to avoid the fires of Hell (for salvation- AG 7).
So Cardinal Ladaria must not suggest that there is true worshop in other religions as he did in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. They are Christianity and the World Religions (1997) and The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptised (2007).
He must interpret the First Commandment, Great Commission, the Creeds, all the Catechisms and Vatican Council II with rational Feeneyism.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.It is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option. This is an issue in philosophy.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional? This is a philosophical issue. A new theology is not being offered here. Instead with the Rational Premise the New Theology is rejected and there is an automatic return to the Old Theology and Eccleisology of the Catholic Church.
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
Posts
