So if Vatican Council II, irrational is a revolution in the Church, then Sacred Scripture and Tradition is not a source of concern for the liberals. Since they get their permission from Vatican Council II, irrational

 

They are nuking Scripture and Tradition since they get the go ahead from Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. If CMTV can accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally then why can they not accept the blessings on homosexual couples? This is the reasoning of the Masons, liberals, the political Left and the popes after Vatican Council II.

When will Bradley Eli and Jules Gomes discuss this ?

If Vatican Council II can be interpreted irrationally and not rationally and this is acceptable for CMTV which does the same, then why cannot (the liberals ask) the Catechism of the Catholic Church be changed?

CMTV does not want to interpret Vatican Council II rationally since they need to accept the Council interpreted rrationally for political reasons-for survival.

So if Vatican Council II, irrational is a revolution in the Church, then Sacred Scripture and Tradition is not a source of concern for the liberals. Since they get their permission from Vatican Council II, irrational.

So CMTV is not interpreting Vatican Council II rationally and are not asking the cardinals and popes to do the same.They are being prudent in a worldly sense.

-Lionel Andrades

rome dispatch

Loaded: 86.07%

Remaining Time -2:38

POPE’S THEOLOGIAN WILL NUKE SCRIPTURE & TRADITION FOR SAME-SEX BLESSINGS

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/romd-popes-theologian-will-nuke-scripture-and-tradition-for-same-sex-blessings

____________________________________________

The 120 or more papal electors are interpreting Vatican Council II with 1) Cushingism and not Feeneyism. 2) For them the passages in red contradict the passages in blue. 3) In the model of the Two Columns they choose the irrational model . This is unethical. It is dishonest and people know about it.

 

From Rorate Caili

Michael Charlier: "Francis Secures His Legacy"

It is objected here and there against the present new appointments that Francis thereby (once again!) exceeds the upper limit of 120 papal electors ordered by Paul VI. While this is true, it is meaningless: the pope is ultimately not bound by any orders of his predecessors. And, after all, the newly appointed officials, instructed by a handwritten letter, could one day learn this to their chagrin. Where such orders had been issued in the form of laws, it would of course be good style to change the law before proceeding differently -- but that is not an obstacle to proceeding differently.

Incidentally, precisely with regard to the manipulation of the upcoming conclave, Francis is faithfully following the example of Paul VI, who, with the arbitrary introduction of the age limit of 80 for papal electors -- which is not according to any tradition in the Church -- quite obviously pursued the intention of excluding older cardinals, more rooted in the "pre-conciliar spirit," from the election of his successor.

Nothing new, then, from post-conciliar Rome.- Peter Kwasnieski, Michael Charlier: "Francis Secures His Legacy", Rorate Caeili

Peter Kwasniewski and Michael Charlier still do not get it. The 120 or more papal electors are interpreting Vatican Council II with 1) Cushingism and not Feeneyism. 2) For them the passages in red contradict the passages in blue. 3) In the model of the Two Columns they choose the irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II. This is unethical. It is dishonest and people know about it. 

May be Kwasniewski still does not understand but there are people who understand that this is immoral. They understand how a fake rupture was created with Tradition with the use of an irrational premise ( invisible people are visible). So the inference is visible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) are practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc.This is Cushingism. This is choosing the wrong Column. The red is an exception for the blue.

 The papal electors must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally, with Feeneyism, with the red not being an exception for the blue and with the rational column.

Once the cardinals know this and choose to interpret the Council rationally they become conservative or traditionalists immediately. There is no theological opening for liberalism, like the new ecumenism, new ecclesiology, new evangelization etc. The Church returns, with Feeneyism, to the lex orandi of only the past.

This is not because the Church chooses a new theology but because it simply avoids the philosophical error ( observing invisible beings as being visible) and returns to the old exclusivist theology of the Catholic Church. It is automatic.

So when the cardinals are no more liberals, because they begin to intepret Vatican Council II rationally, the next pope is expected to be conservative. The popes have to be conservative since the Council would become conservative. It would be traditional and Feeneyite and not traditional and Cushingite or Lefebvrist. -Lionel Andrades

  

 

   

__________________________________________

 

 

-Lionel Andrades