Thursday, June 16, 2022
Taking Jesus to the streets
Renewing belief in Christ's Real Presence
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/taking-christ-to-the-streets
People are going there
Archbishop Zuppi and the St. Egidio organisation reject the teachings of the Catholic Church , on faith and morals. They are highly recommended by the Left. The homosexual 'marriage' in Bologna has been approved by Pope Francis and the cardinals.-Lionel Andrades
An appeal must be made to the Ministry of Education in different countries to have Vatican Council II interpreted with a Rational Premise
An appeal must
be made to individual governments and especially their Ministry of Education to
interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. This must be the norm
in educational institutions etc. Pope Francis’ Traditionis Custode, for
example, should only be interpreted with generally acceptable reasoning.
Otherwise it would be dishonest and unethical. Students and teachers must only
interpret LG 8,LG 14,LG 16,UR 3, NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, as
referring to hypothetical and invisible cases in the present times (
1965-2022).They cannot be anything else in our human reality. So they are not
objective examples of salvation outside the Church, this year. They are not
personally known people, friends and relatives, saved without Catholic faith and
the baptism of water. The Education Ministries must clarify the obvious i.e. we
cannot meet or see any one saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.This must be understood by students and educators. We cannot physically see someone saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible
ignorance and without Catholic faith. We cannot see such a person who would now be in Heaven. We cannot see
people saved with the baptism of desire in Heaven and also on earth at the same
time. No one saw a saint or martyr in Heaven without the baptism of water.
This is common
knowledge based upon Aristotle’s logic and Newton’s concept of the universe and matter.So the popes and cardinals must be asked to confirm this.
There is confusion with Traditionis Custode. Bishops interpret LG 8,LG 14,LG 16,
UR3,NA 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius
Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. So they imply that LG 8 etc refer to
personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church (they would have to be
known to be exceptions).They suggest that there are visible cases of non
Catholics saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) and the baptism of desire (LG
14).Then they infer that there are practical exceptions for the past
ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence
1441 etc).They are telling the world invisible people are visible. This is not
our human reality. Invisible people cannot be visible examples of salvation
outside the Catholic Church last year or this year.
This is
irrational and even non Catholics, including professors and politicians, are
repeating this error at secular institutions.
The Federal Ministry of Education in Germany and France, for example, must show the Catholic bishops and people at large that LG 8 etc, refer to invisible cases in our reality, always. So always they are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
This is a
secular issue when invisible people are assumed to be physically visible and
new philosophies and a theology is created based upon this objective error. The
premise is irrational for everyone, irrespective of his religion or education.
A person could
be free to believe what he wants but the government must not interpret Vatican
Council II irrationally by confusing what is invisible as being visible and
hypothetical as being objective and then project this as being socially
acceptable.
From the
Catholic perspective, it is Magisterial when a Catholic accepts the past
Magisterium and he accepts the present pope in general and only, when these present two popes interpret Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, Catechisms etc)
with a rational premise. A pope is not Magisterial when he interprets Church
Documents with a False Premise and knows that there will be a rupture with the
past Magisterium of the Church, inspired by the Holy Spirit.
OFFICIAL HERESY AND SCHISM EMERGES WITH THE FALSE PREMISE
The present
popes do now meet this criteria with 1.Vatican Council II interpreted with the
common False Premise, 2.the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 accepted with the same
misunderstanding on the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible
ignorance, 3.the Athanasius Creed rejected with alleged visible cases of the
baptism of desire and 4.the Nicene and Apostles Cree re-interpreted with the same
factual error.
From the secular point of view an objective and factual error must not be taught in the schools, universities etc, on this issue.
-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 15, 2022
How can Lumen Gentium 16 an invisible person be a practical exception for EENS ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/how-can-lumen-gentium-16-invisible.html
JUNE 15, 2022
Posts
