Why should vocations to the religious life in Detroit or lay teachers of Catechism, RCIA , Adult Education and Holy Communion classes, interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise instead of without this irrationality ? - Lionel Andrades
Friday, December 18, 2020
All the religious communities need to be told by CMTV that they can interpret Vatican Council II with or without the false premise, there is a rational or irrational option.
All the religious communities need to be told by CMTV that they can interpret Vatican Council II with or without the false premise, there is a rational or irrational option.
Vatican Council II-rational, is traditional and has a hermeneutic of continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There is no break with the ecclesiology of the missionaries of the 16th century. - Lionel Andrades
All the books on Vatican Council II in the library of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit are interpreted with a false premise
All the books on Vatican Council II in the library of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit are interpreted with a false premise.
All the books on Ecclesiology, after 1965, written by Cardinal Ratzinger /Pope Benedict were written with a false premise to create a break with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
All the books on the New Ecumenism, which refer to Vatican Council II, in that library and all the libraries in Detroit, are written with the irrational premise.
It is the same with other categories. -Lionel Andrades
Fr.Joseph Ratzinger used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and create a rupture with Catholic Tradition, it has been discovered after some 55 years. So how can his books and articles on theology be accepted ?
Fr.Joseph Ratzinger used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and create a rupture with Catholic Tradition, it has been discovered after some 55 years. So how can his books and articles on theology be accepted ? He has not apologised or corrected himself.
Someone should tell him that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with or without the false premise and the conclusion would be non traditional or traditional and that he could now choose the traditional option.-Lionel Andrades
Michael Voris supports Brother Andre Marie MICM and also Jim Russell
Michael Voris would say outside the Church there is no salvation but he would also not state that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He would not state that he affirms Feeneyite EENs. Also he will not say that LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc in Vatican Council II are not objective cases in the present times. So they cannot be visible exceptions to EENS. They cannot be physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.He supports Brother Andre Marie MICM and also Jim Russell. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 25, 2019
Church Militant TV slanders Brother Andre Marie MICM and Fr. Leonard Feeney by projecting a false theological position upon them : Jim Russell does not know of any BOD, BOB and I.I case during his life time.
APRIL 24, 2019