Lionel's blog
Today we can proclaim Jesus :-
1) The traditional Jesus with the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church ( all need faith and baptism for salvation-Ad Gentes 7) for salvation( to avoid Hell ).
2) The vague Jesus, compatible with other Christian religions.
3) The vague Jesus without sin, without mortal sin and Hell.
4)Jesus without the Church.
5) The sentimental Jesus,without the Day of Judgement.-Lionel Andrades
The Rome Editor of Breitbart News remains politically with the Left on Catholic theology. -Lionel Andrades
Thomas Williams as Dean of Theology, at the University Regina Apostolorum, Rome, of the Legion of Christ, never affirmed EENS or Vatican Council II without the false premise. Even now as a Catholic layman at Breitbart News, he will not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS, nor interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise.. -Lionel Andrades
If a Catholic has a vocation to the religious life and believes that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation where is he or she going to study to be a priest or religious sister ? There are no institutions. Since even the traditionalist and sedevacantist seminaries are politically correct. They interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a fake premise. It is the same with the pontifical universities and seminaries.. -Lionel Andrades
I do not have an academic degree in philosophy or theology but I interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) rationally.Meanwhile those who have academic degrees in theology and philosophy interpret Vatican Council II and EENS irrationally.
They contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction and are in schism with the past popes on EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc.
I am not in schism.
I do not have to use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
Bishop Robert Barron, Fr. James Martin sj, Fr.Dwight Longenecker, John Allen Jr, Massimo Faggioli and others are now traditionalists without the use of the false premise.
If they do not use the fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents, they would be supporting Tradition, like those whom they have been criticizing all these years.-Lionel Andrades
I do not confuse hypothetical cases as being objective persons in the present times who are saved outside the Catholic Church.So my interpretation of Vatican Council II would be different from the popes since Paul VI.Also my interpretation of EENS would be different from the popes since Pius XII.There is no doctrinal development for me based upon a false premise. For Pope Benedict and Pope Francis there is development and so they do not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS. -Lionel Andrades
A non Christian will only get a scholarship to study at a Catholic University if he will interpret Catholic theology with a false premise. -Lionel Andrades
 |
Christine Niles interprets Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise, as in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and she criticizes Medugorje on doctrine. -Lionel Andrades
Fr. James Martin sj, interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise, with the same irrationality he creates a new version of the Creeds and Catechisms, he does not affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and EENS because of his confusion over what is speculative and practical and he supports homosexual unions. He is in rebellion with Catholic faith and morals, like Pope Francis - and Pope Benedict, who is silent on these issues. -Lionel Andrades
It is hard for Chris Ferrara to say that the was wrong for 55 years.There can be two ways to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II and he chose the rational option and then blamed the Council. -Lionel Andrades
Catholic historian ventured into theology and interpreted Vatican Council II superficially : Mattei does not acknowledge his mistake.
He was misguided by Mons. Brunero Gherardino.. -Lionel Andrades
Catholics who are materially comfortable do not want to answer THREE QUESTIONS. -Lionel Andrades
THREE QUESTIONS
1.How do you interpret Vatican Council II - with LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referring to explicit or implicit cases, objective or subjective cases, visible or invisible people in the present times ?
2.If LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are invisible, subjective and implicit, then LG 8 etc, in Vatican Council II, do not contradict the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church?
3.Do you support Tradition(exclusive salvation) and a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II ? -Lionel Andrades
________________________________
Mary Ellen Mahon and Ellen Goodreau are catechists at the Diocese of Manchester, USA and are approved by Bishop Peter Libasci, Bishop of Manchester, and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.However
Bishop Peter Anthony Libasci, bishop of the diocese of Manchester, USA and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, will not permit Brother Andre Marie MICM, Priot,at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, to have the Latin Mass at their community chapel, since he will not interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with a false premise to create a false rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc ). -Lionel Andrades
Bishop Michael Olsen, Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth,USA and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faih, Vatican, could apologise for demanding that the Fischer More College faculty and students intepret Vatican Council II with the false premise, instead of without it, to have the Latin Mass at the college chapel.-Lionel Andrades
Pope Francis is interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and he is enforcing the error on all bishops and religious communities, with a change in Canon Law. He needs to correct the theological and doctrinal error.Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the false premise. -Lionel Andrades
Msgr. Andrew Faley Assistant General Secretary for Ecumenism and Interfaith Relations, Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales, interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise.He was invited to give a talk at the Beda Pontifical College where he was formerly the Vice Rector.Appointed by Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O Connor, he follows the liberalism of the English bishops.It is based upon the irrational interpretation of Magisterial documents to create an artificial rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc ).Without the false premise there would be no development of doctrine, liberalism or New Ecumenism.-Lionel Andrades
At the Beda Pontifical College, the English seminary, in Rome for late vocations,the Rector and faculty are only accepting candidates for priestly ministry, who agree to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and change the understanding of the Creeds and Catechisms to create a New Ecumenism, New Theology,New Ecclesiology etc. -Lionel Andrades
I would like to join a religious community but I cannot find any one which is not in dissent. They all interpret Vatican Council II and other Church-documents with a false premise.There is no Religious Superior who interprets the Council rationally. -Lionel Andrades
The New Canon Law ensures heresy and dissent among bishops and religious communities will be maintained and all will interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise.. -Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Joao Braz de Avez, prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Religious Life and Archbishop José Rodriguez Carballo,Secretary, are only approving religious institus which interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise . Changes in Canon Law have been made. -Lionel Andrades
http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio-20201101_authenticum-charismatis.html
Posts
