Cushingite signatories unaware of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) ploy : repeat same mistake.

Cushingite signatories unaware of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) ploy : repeat same mistake.

Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). It is a break with the old ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors. It has made the Athanasius Creed , on outside the Church there is no salvation, obsolete.

So traditional doctrine on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church did not exist any more for Pope Francis, at the Abu Dhabi meeting.He was referring to Vatican Council II (Cushingite) which is the only way the traditionalists, sedevacantists and conservatives interpret the Council. Just like him!!

So his response once again to the group of 19 Catholic priests and academics who have issued a 20- page open letter to the bishops,1 and who are Cushingites,is, Vatican Council II.It will always be Vatican Council II( Cushingite) until they get smart.

Similarly his response to the dubbia cardinals on Amoris Laetitia  would again be  Vatican Council II( Cushingite) !!!
Vatican Council II Cushingite and not Vatican Council II Feeneyite.
For Cardinals Burke and Brandmuller unknown cases  of being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), the baptism of desire(BOD) and the baptism of blood(BOB) are visible and known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is Cushingism.So EENS has exceptions for the dubbia cardinals.
For them hypothetical cases, known only to God, referred to in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective and known exceptions to EENS.Cushingism again.
So ecclesiology has been changed for the dubbia cardinals.It is new.They accept the New Ecclesiology based upon cases known only to God also being known to human beings.They believe that there are known  exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
So if ecclesiology can be changed said Cardinal Kasper-very directly, in an interview, then so can the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried.
So it was the same with Amoris Laetitia.The exception makes the rule. Subjectivity is assumed to be objective.
Amoris Laetitia suggests that a priest can know in a particular case( which would otherwise be known only to God) when some one in mortal sin is not in mortal sin.
Sounds familiar?!
Someone else defending Amoris Laetitia said that it had the same moral theology of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
On mortal sin, the Catechism refers to those 'who know'. There is no more an objective mortal sin only.Mortal sin is not always a mortal sin anymore but depends upon conditions, which allegedly can be known to us human beings.
Sounds familiar?!
For Pope Benedict every one does not need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation but only those who know.
Why only those who know?
Since for Cardinal Ratzinger, Cardinal Kasper,Fr. Rahner and other liberal theologians at Vatican Council II, there were known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.The excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney was still not lifted by Cardinal Richard Cushing, who was active at Vatican Council II.
So there were also known exceptions for Cardinal Ratzinger, to the traditional moral theology, which was black and white, and which Pope John Paul II tried to salvation with Veritatis Splendor.
In faith( salvation) and morals( mortal sin) it is assumed that there are exceptions.It was also presumed wrongly  that we humans could judge an exception. 
This is Cushingism in faith and morals.The ecclesiastics used the same technique to change traditional teachings. 
Now this bad reasoning is also used by the 19 signatories to interpret Vatican Council II not knowing that with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) the Council does not contradict EENS.
So the next time when the pope , cardinals, bishops and the Left, refer to Vatican Council II, it is hoped that they will be  aware that the reference is not to Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).
To interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism is heresy -but it is also the heresy of the signatories.
They first need to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite EENS and then ask the two popes and the CDF to do the same.They can then ask the cardinals and bishops to do likewise.
Then Ecclesiastical Masonry can no more say that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition and the spirit of Vatican Council II supports, heresy, sacrilege and schism.
It is important that the signatories clarify this point - at least before the next petition.
For instance Prof. Massimo Faggioli has said that there is very little critique of Pope Francis' theology. There is no critique ! How can Cushingites critique a Cushingite ? Faggioli himself can only interpet Vatican Council II with Cushingism. He knows there is an alternative but he will not write about it.He could have an ideological interest.
But this is not the problem with the signatories.
The same mistake was made in the 2017 Filial Correction.2
-Lionel Andrades

1

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5983408-Open-Letter-to-the-Bishops-of-the-Catholic.html

2

http://www.correctiofilialis.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Correctio-filialis_English_1.pdf

Mary Ellen Mahon, Director for Catholic Education in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester, knows she teaches an irrationality in the interpretation of magisterial documents. She does not deny it. For her this is being Catholic

I have sent these blog posts to Mary Ellen Mahon and Kelly Goodreau and there is no reply. No reply too from the Very Rev. Georges de Laire.

Mahon and Goodreau are catechists in the Diocese of Manchester, USA they  should be prompt to give an account of their Catholic faith.There is no comment from the Vocational Director, Fr. Matthew Mason.If a young man with a religious vocation would ask him these four questions,he would not answer.1

The young man with a vocation to the priesthood would be given false answers, the concept being ' the red is an exception to the blue' and 'invisible people are visible'.Mahon, Goodreau and Mason are of course only following the instructions of their superiors. 

They know that Bishop Peter Libasci and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are teaching irrational philosophy( invisible people are visible) but they will keep silent. They will even teach it to others.

This irrationality is what gives them their identity.It makes them the new-Church, Am-Church or the false church within the Catholic Church.

They approve of 'Precepts of Prohibitions'on the diocese website against the St.Benedict Center(SBC). Since the SBC in the diocese will not say that 'the red is an exception to the blue' and 'invisible non Catholics are visible' in New Hampshire.

In an e-mail to me,Mary Ellen Mahon has said that the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center cannot be considered Catholic.

Mahon, is Director for Catholic Education in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester.

Those who interpret Vatican Council II rationally and do not reject the Council, which is in harmony with other magisterial documents( when interpreted rationally) are not considered Catholic.Mary Ellen Mahon does not do this.So she is considered Catholic by Bishop Libasci and the CDF.

Those who interpret Vatican Council II, without the false premise and in harmony with exclusive salvation, the old ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return are not Catholic for Mahon. Mahon interprets Vatican Council II with the false invisble-non-Catholics-are-visible theory.So she artificially creates a rupture with the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.Then she is officially accepted as a Catholic, by the CDF and Bishop Libasci.

Someone is a Catholic for Mary Ellen Mahon, who uses the invisible people are visible theory to contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X.It says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.It mentions that the followers of other religions are outside the Church.

Similarly to be a Catholic the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) has to be put aside, when it says that the Catholic Church is like the Ark of Noah in which all must enter for salvation (CCC 845).

This is her criteria for being Catholic for , for example, a Catholic judge in a secular court or tribunal in New England, USA. 
A Catholic professor or a head of a social or charitable organisation in New Hampshire would also not be Catholic for Mary Ellen Mahon if they say that invisible people who do not exist in our reality cannot be objective exceptions to EENS. They cannot be cited as literal exceptions  to all needing to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation in 2019.Invisible non Catholics are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) for  Mahon however,in 2019. 
She has not denied this in our communication.
This is how Bishop Peter Libasci and the bishops in Boston, would expect her to interpret Vatican Council II,Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Catechisms and Creeds and  EENS, to be a Catholic catechist.

Mary Ellen Mahon, Director for Catholic Education in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester, knows she teaches an irrationality in the interpretation of magisterial documents. She does not deny it. For her this is being Catholic.-Lionel Andrades

 1

1.Do we humans personally know any one saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance in 2019?  Answer: No

2.Do we personally know any one saved outside the Catholic Church i.e without Catholic faith and the baptism of water, with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8), 'imperfect communion with the Church'(UR 3), being people of goodwill (GS 22) etc, in 2019? Answer : No.

3.So do you think the St.Benedict Center in New Hampshire is correct in saying outside the Church there is no salvation? Answer: Yes.

4.Vatican Council II says all need faith and baptism for salvation ( and BOD, BOB and I.I are invisible and unknown), the Catechism of Pope Pius X says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) says the Catholic Church is like the Ark of Noah in which all need to enter for salvation(CCC 845).

Do you know any objective exception to these  teaching in Vatican Council II and the Catechisms? 2   Answer: No

Even the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary the religious community of Fr. Leonard Feeney in the diocese would answer these four questions like Mahon and Goodreau.

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/mary-ellen-mahon-and-kelly-goodreau.html

_____________________________________________


 

April 30, 2019

Bishop Peter Libasci's pastoral programs are based upon a non Catholic irrationality which creates false philosophy and theology 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/bishop-peter-libascis-pastoral-programs.html