The Truth About You! What Many Catholic Miss About Their Faith

We are in schism.

 

We are in schism. There is a schism from the Left. They are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally to produce a break with the Magisterial Church. It is a fake break with Tradition. It is approved by the popes from Paul VI who interpret the Council with a fake premise and inference. This interpretation is different from those of us who interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly.

Since the popes support the schism in faith and morals, doctrine and theology the mainline Church follows this error.

How can we have a pope who intentionally interprets the Council irrationally while so many of interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so honestly?

Interpreting the Council irrationally even after being informed is public heresy. It is a disqualification as a pope.

Interpreting the Council irrationally changes the meaning of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. This is public schism. It is schism, a break with the past Magisterium and a rejection of Catholic Canon Law.

The Judges at the Vatican Supreme Tribunal are also expected to be honest and to inform the pope of his error.

Cardinals and bishops are obliged morally to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and to inform the pope of his error.

Pope Francis must make the correction in public. It could mean that cardinals like Kasper, Koch and Nichols may not want to remain in the Catholic Church any more. Since it will demand a big change in their style, even maybe actual martyrdom.

We now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional. So Pope Francis, can no more cite Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally, to justify his liberalism and innovation, supporting mortal sins of faith and morals, in public.-Lionel Andrades

 MARCH 7, 2018

I am the only Catholic pointing out this general schism, which is a like a doctrinal epidemic in the Church.I do not use the false premise and so am schism-free.

Are you saying everybody is in schism except for yourself?

I am saying everybody is interpreting Vatican Council II as a rupture with 'the strict interpretation' of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors.This includes the popes, cardinals and bishops and also the traditionalists.Both liberals and conservatives use an irrational premise, of which they are not aware of,to interpret the Council II.The result is a rupture with the popes over the centuries.The conservatives criticize the Council and the liberals welcome it.Both accept the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 unknowingly.They repeat that error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.

So they are in a rupture with the past popes and Church Councils.This is schism.

POPE BENEDICT CONFIRMS SCHISM

Pope Benedict confirmed this schism in March 2016 when he said in public that EENS for him, was  no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. There was 'a development' with Vatican Council II for him.He questioned the need for Mission since for him there was known salvation outside the Church and this was mentioned in Vatican Council II for him.

CARDINAL LADARIA CONFIRMS SCHISM

Then on March 1,2018, two years after the popes schismatic statement, Cardinal Luiz Ladaria at the Press Conference on Placuito Dei confirmed that the Catholic Church no more claims superiority and exclusiveness in salvation, as in the past.He cited Lumen Gentium 8  as an exception  to EENS.Since for him it refers not to a hypothetical case but known people saved outside the Church in the present times.This was his take on LG 8 and definitely not mine.

OFFICIAL SCHISM ON DOCTRINE MADE PUBLIC BY THEM

This is public schism with the popes and Church Councils of the past. Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria could have interpreted Vatican Council II as I do. Then there would not be a rupture with Tradition.They chose not to do so even though there are so many reports on line explaining this error which can be avoided.

DOCTRINALLY I AVOID THE FALSE PREMISE

I affirm Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyite theology i.e with hypothetical cases being non hypothetical and without there being practical exceptions to EENS in 2018 or in the past.Invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc cannot be practical exceptions to EENS.This is common sense.

I affirm the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which supports EENS according to the Magisterium of the 16th century and I reject the second part of the Letter which contradicts the first part and Tradition.It mixes up what is invisible as being visible.This is an error which is obvious.

CATHOLICS IN GENERAL ARE NOT AWARE OF THIS

Ecclesiastical Masonry supports this false premise,invisible people are visible in the present times for them, and Catholics in general are not aware of this.

FR.LEONARD FEENEY WAS SET UP FOR HIS ORTHODOXY

The Magisterium in schism and heresy used the false premise to interpret EENS and then excommunicated Fr. Leonard Feeney for his orthodoxy on this subject.

THEY EXCOMMUNICATED ABP.LEFEBVRE FOR SPEAKING THE TRUTH

They also used the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past and then excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for rejecting this version of the  Council.

Now when the SSPX does not accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, some say that the SSPX is in schism.

CATHOLICS GENERALLY IN SCHISM CANNOT EXPECT THE POPES TO CORRECT THE ERROR

So in general Catholics today are doctrinally and theologically in schism and this is approved by a Magisterium gone sour.Catholics cannot expect the popes to speak the truth and correct the error.

It is really the present Magisterium which is in schism and the doctrinal proof is there on line.The present Magisterium has to align itself with the past popes on EENS and re-interpret Vatican Council II in line with Tradition.It is their false theology, based on a philosophical error,which creates the rupture. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction by telling us there are known people saved, who are now in Heaven without the baptism of water, and are supposedly  exceptions on earth to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS. People in Heaven are visible on earth!

This is what I call Cushingite Theology( New Theology) as opposed to traditional Feeneyite theology.Cushingism causes the hermeneutic of rupture  with the past.

I am the only Catholic pointing out this general schism, which is a like a doctrinal epidemic in the Church.I do not use the false premise and so am schism-free.

-Lionel Andrades

MARCH 6, 2018

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Archbishops Guido Pozzo and Augustine di Noia are schismatic but I am not since I affirm all magisterial documents but interpret them with Feeneyism.So there is no rupture with the past popes.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-archbishops-guido.html

 MARCH 6, 2018

Schismatic Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's rejection of exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church last Thursday comes from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 : dark footprints also there in Christianity and the World Religions and The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptised,ITC

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/schismatic-cardlinal-luiz-ladarias.html

_________________________________________________

THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 2022

Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise.This is similar to the Society of St. Pius X, and the Ecclesia Dei communities. : this is schismatic

 

In the last Confraternity of Our Lady of Fatima Question and Answer session Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise.This is similar to the Society of St. Pius X, and the Ecclesia Dei communities. The False Premise creates exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors etc, Traditional ecclesiocentrism with no known exceptions is rejected. The bishop has chosen to interpret Vatican Council II politically like the present two popes. They too use the False Premise to produce schism with the past Magisterium.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider who said that the Society of St. Pius X was not in schism had some time back in an interview with Eric Sammons of Crisis Magazine  described the Council as being Christocentric. He did not say that the Council was ecclesiocentric. So he accepts the New Ecumenism etc in the interpretation of Vatican Council II which can only be created with a False Premise.

His interpretation of Vatican Council II is deceptive. He is assuming that there are literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14).

Some time back he had also asked for the removal of Lumen Gentium 16 indicating that he interprets LG 16 with the False Premise ( invisible cases are visible).For him  LG 16 would contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.But not for me, since LG 16 refers to an invisible case in 2022. So his interpretation is the same as the liberals and Masons.

Schism is a mortal sin of faith. Changing the interpretation of the Creeds is first class heresy.This is a scandal.

The priests of the SSPX, Ecclesia Dei and Bishop Schneider hear Confessions of Catholics who are sin…

They have not supported the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center, Still River, USA. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the bishop and judical vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, USA, wanted Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior, to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with the False Premise.So there is a Decree of Prohibitions being maintained against the St. Benedict Center but this is avoided by Bishop Schneider and the Lefebvrist tradtionalists who use the False Premise.

The Lefebvrists had to announce that the baptism of desire etc were practical exceptions for Feenetyite EENS.They also had to announce that LG  14 etc were practical exceptions for EENS.This is irrational. It is with the irrationality that schism is created.

It is with this same irrationality that Bishop 

Schneider has interpreted the Council in his recent statement posted on Gloria TV. This interpretation by the traditionalists is politically correct with the Left and the Vatican. -Lionel Andrades

 JANUARY 19, 2022

Bishop Athanasius Schneider said that the Society of St. Pius X was not in schism. But the SSPX is in schism when they interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise, like the Ecclesia Dei communities at Cortalain, France last September. The False Premise has to create schism.

 

In the last Confraternity of Our Lady of Fatima Question and Answer session Bishop Athanasius Schneider said that the Society of St. Pius X was not in schism. But the SSPX is in schism when they interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise, like the Ecclesia Dei communities at Cortalain, France last September.

The False Premise has to create schism.

Now the SSPX cannot affirm the Athanasius Creed since there are exceptions created with the Fake Premise.There are none for me.

They cannot affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on an ecumenism of return to the Church since there are exceptions created with the False Premise. So their New Theology is the same as the liberals and the Masons.

Their website rejects Feeneyite EENS since for them the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and the baptism of blood are objective cases since 1965.

The Catechism of Pope Pius X (29Q-invincible ignorance) contradicts the same Catechism (24Q.27Q-outside the Church there is no salvation).This is all schism with the past Magisterium.

The past Magisterium did not use the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. St. Thomas Aquinas did not say that the man in the forest saved in invincible ignorance was a known case and so a practical exception for EENS, which he held. Hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were not objective exceptions for the strict interpretation of EENS, for St. Robert Bellarmine. This is common sense.

The SSPX interprets the Council schismatically like the FSSP. So the FSSP did not correct Bishop Roland Minnerath at Dijon, France, who has written books supporting a theology of religious pluralism and the rejection of the Syllabus of Errors.

This is schism. This is first class heresy. Schism and heresy are mortal sins of faith.

Today the SSPX can get out of schism and choose the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. They have to admit that Pope Pius XII made an objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and that unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance cannot be known and visible exceptions for traditional Feeneyite EENS. They must announce that LG 8, LG 14. LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2022.This is something obvious. 

So then there would be nothing in the Council-text to contradict the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and 16^th century EENS.

Vatican Council II would be traditional, exclusivist and in harmony with the popes, saints and martyrs of the past.

This though, is not the Vatican Council II of the popes from Paul VI to Francis I. It is they who are in schism and can choose orthodoxy with the Rational Premise.-Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2022

CMTV and John Salza choose official heresy and schism and want the SSPX to do the same

 

from the CMTV website with comments:

The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX)

Position on Canonical Status

The position of Church Militant concerning the SSPX is that of the Holy Father, Emeritus Pope Benedict XVI, as expressed in the motu proprio Ecclesiae Unitatem, issued July 2, 2009:

In the same spirit and with the same commitment to encouraging the resolution of all fractures and divisions in the Church and to healing a wound in the ecclesial fabric that was more and more painfully felt, I wished to remit the excommunication of the four Bishops illicitly ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre.

SSPX IS BEING FORCED TO ACCEPT AN IRRATIONAL VERSION OF THE COUNCIL 

Lionel: The excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was illicit. Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger were interpreting Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise, like Pope Paul VI, and were forcing this upon the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX).

LEFEBVRE CORRECTLY REJECTED THE SCHISMATIC VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II

 Archbishop Lefebvre correctly rejected this schismatic interpretation of Vatican Council II. The popes would still not set a good example and interpret the Council rationally. Vatican Council II would be in harmony with Tradition. There would be no practical exceptions mentioned in the Council-text for extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions, as it was interpreted over the centuries.There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican.They choose the Irrational Premise,False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents( Creeds and Catechisms).Church Militant TV does the same and expediently calls it magisterial.

_______________

 

ONUS FOR PROOF LIES WITH THE CDF

Lionel: The onus for specifying the doctrinal difference or shortcoming of the SSPX is with the CDF.If they say the issue is Vatican Council II they could be precise.I accept Vatican Council II. I affirm it in public.I interpret it only with the Rational Premise. So the Council, for me, has a hermeneutic of continuity with the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Pope John Paul II.

________________________________________ 

 

The SSPX bishops were excommunicated and their illicit consecrations defined as schismatic in the motu proprio Ecclesia Dei issued July 2, 1988:

In itself, this act was one of disobedience to the Roman Pontiff in a very grave matter and of supreme importance for the unity of the Church, such as is the ordination of bishops whereby the apostolic succession is sacramentally perpetuated. Hence such disobedience — which implies in practice the rejection of the Roman primacy — constitutes a schismatic act. (emphasis added)

The excommunications have been lifted, but the canonical status of the SSPX remains unchanged. 

There are two important points here:

1. The SSPX is not in full communion with the Church and is invited by the Church to rediscover this path. 

POPES MUST CHOOSE A RATIONAL AND NOT IRRATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II TO BE IN COMMUNION WITH THE CHURCH

Lionel: The popes from Paul VI to Francis are not in communion with the Church when they choose an Irrational and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. They are invited, with good will and humility, to rediscover this path of full communion. They must affirm the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors, in harmony with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, with a Rational Premise.

___________________________

RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES WHICH DO NOT INTEPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY ARE GRANTED CANONICALY RECOGNITION.

2. The SSPX has no canonical status in the Church and its ministers cannot legitimately exercise any ministry.

Lionel: Only those religious communities have been granted canonical recognition by the present two popes, who do not accept Vatican Council II. They do not affirm Vatican Council II. The Council can only be interpreted rationally. This is the only ethical option there is for all Catholics.

__________________________

This has never been formally changed by the Holy See, in spite of Pope Francis' recent indults allowing the Society to witness marriages or hear confessions — a benefit provided explicitly for the good of the faithful in the Jubilee Year of Mercy, and extended indefinitely.

While SSPX loyalists love to cite Pope Francis' indult as "proof" the SSPX cannot be in schism, recall that the Orthodox Church also has faculties to witness marriages and hear confessions, yet no Catholic would claim the Orthodox Church is not in schism. This is simply not an argument that can be made.

Some mistakenly argue that Pope Benedict's 2009 lifting of the excommunications on four SSPX bishops ended the schism. Not true. Benedict's lifting of the excommunications did nothing to change the SSPX's objective state of schism, any more than Pope Paul VI's 1965 lifting of excommunications imposed on Orthodox bishops affected the Orthodox Church's state of schism.

CARDINAL LADARIA HAS SAID THAT THE SSPX IS PART OF THE CHURCH AND THE DIALOGUE CONTINUES

Lionel: The issue of schism comes from Vatican Council II. Bishop Bernard Fellay has said that the SSPX does not reject Vatican Council II, it accepts 90% of the Council. Archbishop Lefebvre was present at the Council and signed the documents. Recently Pope Francis met the Superior of the SSPX and Cardinal Ladaria said that the SSPX is a part of the Church and the dialogue continues.Ladaria did not prohibit Catholics from visiting SSPX chapels and attending Mass there.

POPES ARE STILL INTERPRETING VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY AND REJECTING THE DOGMA EENS

But the issue of schism still exists.The popes like CMTV, John Salza,Michael Lofton and other liberals are interpreting Vatican Council II unethically and expect the SSPX to accept this for canonical recognition. If the SSPX did so they would be in schism with the past Magisterium on the Nicene and Apostles Creed which would have a variation. They would be in schism with the pre 1949 Magisterium on the Athanasius Creeds which is rejected outright by liberal Rome.The Catechisms would have a confused interpretation and the doctrinal chaos would not be corrected. Why must they accept all this innovation? They are free to interpret the Council rationally and expect Rome to do the same.

________________________

In the letter accompanying Traditionis Custodes, Pope Francis also refers to the SSPX as in schism:

The faculty — granted by the indult of the Congregation for Divine Worship in 1984[2] and confirmed by St. John Paul II in the Motu Proprio Ecclesia Dei in 1988[3] — was above all motivated by the desire to foster the healing of the schism with the movement of Abp. Lefebvre. (emphasis added)

CDF IS IN OFFICIAL SCHISM WITH NO DENIAL FOR POLITICAL REASONS. 

Lionel: The onus for healing the official schism of the popes lies with the CDF. The innovation in Catholic doctrine with a False Premise, Inference and Conclusion is there in public. It can be read on the Internet.There are many reports over the years( not on CMTV) which call attention to this problem in the Church.It is like a theological epidemic.

______________________________ 

Cardinal Raymond Burke, former prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, has explicitly said the SSPX is in schism. He made the remarks at the Sacred Liturgy conference in Medford, Oregon in July 2017:

[T]he fact of the matter is that the Priestly Society of St. Pius X is in schism since the late Abp. Marcel Lefebvre ordained four bishops without the mandate of the Roman Pontiff. And so it is not legitimate to attend Mass or to receive the sacraments in a church that's under the direction of the Priestly Society of St. Pius X.

ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE CORRECTLY REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE POLITICAL VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II 

Lionel: Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre ordained four bishops, three of whom have been accepted by Pope Francis and the CDF. He ordained them because the basic problem was accepting Vatican Council II interpreted heretically and schismatically by Pope Paul VI.So Lefebvre correctly refused to accept this political version of the Council.

Pope Francis now has a choice. He can interpret Vatican Council II rationally and invite the whole Church, including the SSPX, to do the same.

I ask: why should I as a Catholic interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational and not Rational Premise? Why must I be deceptive

__________________________ 

Cardinal Gerhard Müller, former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, has also said the SSPX is in schism in comments made in 2013 to the Italian press:

The canonical excommunication of the bishops for their illegal ordinations was revoked, but a de facto sacramental excommunication remains for their schism; they put themselves out of communion with the Church. After that we are not closing the door and never will, but we are inviting them to be reconciled. But they too must change their attitude, accept the conditions of the Catholic Church, and the Supreme Pontiff as the definitive criterion for membership.

 BISHOP ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY. CMTV AND JOHN SALZA COULD DO THE SAME.

Lionel: Cardinal Gerhard Muller, (it has been pointed out often on social media) interprets Vatican Council II politically like Pope Benedict and Pope Francis. He can choose to interpret LG 8,14,15,16 etc as being only hypothetical cases.They are not examples of people whom we know in the present times saved outside the Church.He could clarify this point.Then he would be interpreting the Council rationally, like Bishop Athanasius Schneider .

Cardinal Muller too must say like Bishop Schnieder that there is salvation in only Jesus in only the Catholic Church. Bishop Schneider told Dr.Taylor Marshall that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire( LG 14).So Bishop Schneider is not in schism with the Magisterium of the Church over the centuries. Cardinal Muller is in schism caused by the False Premise.It is the False Premise, Cushingism, which creates schism and heresy.

________________________

FULTON SHEEN INTERPRETED VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY

Even Ven. Abp. Fulton J. Sheen has said the SSPX is in schism. (We recommend this video by two former SSPX adherents on the Lefebvrite schism.)

Lionel: Archbishop Fulton Sheen whom I admire and whose books I read as a youth was also interpreting Vatican Council II with schismatic Cushingism. He never corrected his error.

________________________

CUSHINGISM CREATES HERESY AND SCHISM IRRESPECTIVE OF WHO USES IT

Communion with the Chair of Peter is a constitutive part of Roman Catholicism — something the SSPX accepts in principle but rejects in practice. 

Lionel: The Chair of Peter because of Cushingism, is in a rupture with the one holy Catholic and apostolic Church. It can correct this error immediately, over night, by choosing the Rational Premise and inviting the whole Church to do the same.Cushingism is the infiltration in the Catholic Church.

_________________________

THE SSPX MUST ASK CARDINAL LADARIA TO COME BACK TO TRADITION BY INTERPRETING VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY.

As Pope Benedict said, the SSPX has "no canonical status," "no legitimate ministry," is "invited to rediscover the path to full communion," has no faculties from any bishop, is not part of the divinely ordained hierarchical structure of the Church and all its priests are suspended a divinis. 

Lionel: Cardinal Ladaria re-evaluated this position and said that the SSPX are part of the Church and the dialogue continues. The SSPX must ask Cardinal Ladaria to come back to Tradition by interpreting Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms rationally.Last Sunday I went for the 10 a.m Mass in Italian at the church of the Augustinian Recollects in Rome where I received the Eucharist.Then I went for the morning Mass in Latin at the SSPX St.Catherine of Siena chapel,Rome.I did not receive the Eucharist there.The homilies of the SSPX priests are refreshing.I miss them at Mass in Italian.

_____________________

THE SSPX MUST NOT INTERPRET ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED WITH HERETICAL AND SCHISMATIC CUSHINGISM

We are well aware of ongoing dialogue between the SSPX and Rome. It is to be fervently hoped that this dialogue results in a return of the SSPX to full communion with the Church, granting its bishops and clergy canonical status and the authority to exercise ministry. Reconciliation of the SSPX with the Church would be a great blessing for the Church but most especially for the SSPX.

Lionel : The SSPX must not accept Vatican Council II interpreted with heretical and schismatic Cushingism.This is the compromise of CMTV, John Salza and others whose priorities are not the Catholic faith but their worldly priorities.

The SSPX must insist that Pope Francis and Cardinal Ladaria accept Vatican Council II.The Council can only be interpreted with a Rational Premise.This is a given.

___________________________

The SSPX has consistently refused the most generous and magnanimous invitations from the Church to reconcile and place itself under the authority of the Vicar of Christ, rejecting his dogmatically defined "full power of shepherding, ruling and governing the universal Church," a power "ordinary and immediate over all the churches and over each and every member of the faithful" ("The Pope Exercises Supreme Jurisdiction" [Original Italian here]).

Lionel: Pope Francis like the CMTV, John Salza and Michael Lofton rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This dogma has been defined by three Church Councils which did not mention any exceptions. This is public heresy and schism. This is:  not being in communion with the Mystical Body of the Church.This is a mortal sin of faith.For political-left reasons CMTV, John Salza and other liberals are going along with it. There condition is so bad that they will not deny what I say here.They  pretend that these mortal sins of faith are inspired by the Holy Spirit and are magisterial.

____________________________

Perhaps the SSPX fears it will be crushed by an unsympathetic hierarchy and pope.

Lionel: CMTV, John Salza, Michael Lofton, liberals and leftists, have compromised. Even traditionalists have compromised to protect their media and other interests from being attacked by the Left. The popes too are not accepting Vatican Council II.

____________________

 Perhaps it is justified in such fearful apprehensions. But there is precedent in the history of the Church — in the lives of the saints, in the life of Our Lord Himself — for risking or allowing oneself to be crushed by obedience. 

Lionel: St.Maximillian Kolbe says that one should not be obedient to a superior if he teaches heresy.His error should be rejected.Common sense!

The popes must set an example and affirm the Catholic faith ;the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.

______________________

Until such time as the SSPX chooses to reconcile with the Church, Church Militant must support the judgment of the Holy Father and the Church concerning its status.

Lionel: Until Church Militant, John Salza, Michael Lofton and others, have to survive in an hostile environment they will choose not to accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, with the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.- Lionel Andrades

https://www.churchmilitant.com/main/generic/sspx