Sunday, October 21, 2018

Milvian Bridge today (Ponte Milvio)



Image result for Milvian Bridge rome today

Image result for Milvian Bridge rome today
Image result for Ponte Milvio photos
Image result for Ponte Milvio photos

MILVIAN BRIDGE



The City of Rome is overflowing with sites of Christian interest, from the Papal properties and the Vatican to the memorials and tombs of literally hundreds of Catholic saints.  However, from an historical standpoint, there are few secular places in Rome quite as important to Christianity as the Ponte Milvio, or Milvian Bridge.  It was here, on October 27, 312 AD, that the Roman Emperor Constantine received the vision that would change Christianity forever.  His subsequent victory, which he attributed to divine intervention, led directly to his issuance of the Edict of Milan a year later, effectively ending persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire.  Amazingly, the Milvian Bridge is now in its 22nd century and still in use, making it one of Rome’s oldest surviving structures.

From its inception in the 1st century to the end of the reign of the emperor Diocletian at the beginning of the 4th century, the history of Christianity largely consisted of a seemingly endless succession of persecutions and tribulations.  Tens of thousands of Christians were martyred during these early years, and millions more suffered fom cruelty and hardship.  This might have gone on indefinitely had it not been for a curious turning point in Christian, and world, history: the Battle of Milvian Bridge in 312 AD.
In the late 3rd century, the Emperor Diocletian oversaw a turbulent period in Rome’s history.  In an effort to stabilize the empire, he established the Tetrarchy, in which four emperors would rule jointly.  The highly capable Diocletian made this system work during his lifetime, keeping the other three emperors in line.  However, the system broke down immediately after his death.  Within a few years two of the tetrarchs were dead, and the empire was left in the hands of Maxentius in the east and Constantine in the west.  Maxentius, with the greater resources and manpower of the east at his disposal, occupied Rome, which was part of the western sphere of influence.  Constantine invaded Italy in 312 with an army from Gaul in an effort to dislodge him.
Constantine easily defeated Maxentius’ forces in northern Italy, and then marched southwards to meet his enemy who was ensconced at Rome with a vastly superior force.  Although he was on the strategic offensive, Constantine’s outlook for victory was grim.  However, on the eve of the battle, Constantine received a vision in the sky, instructing him to ‘mark the Heavenly sign on the shields of his army’.  Taking this to mean the sign of a Christian cross, he had every shield in in his army so marked.  The next day, Maxentius inexplicably led his army outside of Rome’s gates to meet Constantine in open battle rather than remain safely within the city walls.  Instead of waiting out what should have been an easy siege, Maxentius’ army was routed in one of the biggest military upsets in history.
Afterwards, Constantine became the undisputed ruler of most of the Roman Empire.  He attributed both his victory and his newly-won throne to the divine intervention of the God of the Christians, and for the first time since the death of Jesus of Nazareth, there was a Roman emperor who was genuinely sympathetic to Christianity.  The next year he issued the Edict of Milan, which guaranteed religious freedom to all people, effectively legalizing the Christian faith.  Constantine himself converted in later years, thereby guaranteeing the ascendancy of Christianity in the Middle Ages.  Amazingly, the Milvian Bridge still stands in northern Rome, an architectural testament to this miraculous victory and Roman engineering.

Visiting

The Milvian Bridge crosses the Tiber River near where it bends eastward on the north side of Rome.  It connects two of the city’s most ancient roads: the Via Cassia to the north and the Via Flaminia to the south.  A considerable distance away from the Vatican enclave and even the Villa Borghese, it is far from Rome’s major tourist areas.  However, it is still a favorite place for strolling among locals and those tourists who do find their way there.
The first bridge built on the site dated from the 3rd century BC, but this was replaced by a new structure in 115 BC.  Most of the current bridge dates from this time, though later renovations occurred in the 15th, 18th and 19th centuries.  Its graceful arches and excellent stonework still impress after two thousand years.  A tower guards the southern end of the bridge, though this only dates from the 1800s.  A lamppost on the center of the bridge may be found to be covered in padlocks, a relatively new phenomenon inspired by a recent popular Italian movie.
The Milvian Bridge is located about ten miles north of central Rome, but is reachable by public transportation.  It is an open site, accessible to pedestrians only.  There is no charge for admission.  Web: www.turismoroma.it/cosa-fare/ponte-milvio (official website)

Other Sites

Constantine commemorated his great victory over Maxentius by erecting the Arch of Constantine, a triumphal monument located between the Palatine Hill and the Colosseum.  The ruins of the Mediolanum Palace, where the Edict of Milan was issued, are outside of the modern-day city of Milan.
http://thecompletepilgrim.com/milvian-bridge/

Repost : 1700 th ANNIVERSARY FOR THE APPARITION TO KING CONSTANTINE AND HIS VISTORY AT THE MILVIAN BRIDGE CELEBRATED IN ROME

OCTOBER 28, 2012

1700 th ANNIVERSARY FOR THE APPARITION TO KING CONSTANTINE AND HIS VISTORY AT THE MILVIAN BRIDGE CELEBRATED IN ROME

Today Sunday morning the 1700th anniversary of the victory of King Constantine in the battle at the Milvian Bridge was celebrated at a Mass held in Latin in the Extraordinary Form at the Church San Giuseppe a Capo le Case, Rome.Also celebrated today was the  traditional feast of Christ the King.

 
Father.Marco in his homily asked that the Church recognize and celebrate this day.














On Saturday evening at the Ponte Milvio (Milvian bridge) over the Tiber River there was a gathering to recall the apparition of Constantine.There was a procession and lamps were lit.

Constantine with his army was marching.. when he looked up to the sun and saw a cross of light above it, and with it the Greek words "Εν Τούτῳ Νίκα", En toutō níka, usually translated into Latin as "in hoc signo vinces," both phrases have the literal meaning "In this sign,[you shall] conquer;" a more free translation would be "Through this sign [you shall] conquer". At first he was unsure of the meaning of the apparition, but in the following night he had a dream in which Christ explained to him that he should use the sign against his enemies...-Wikipidea

On Saturday, Daniele Sebastianelli, Responsible of Militia Christ spoke of the different ways Catholics (Christians) were tortured and exiled.It was after Oct.28,312 A.D that Catholics were free to live their faith without persecution.

Fr.Marco today morning said that Constantine's victory was a plan of God for the Church and the salvation of all people.It was divine intervention in our history, he said, when Constantine saw a cross.

Members of the Militia Christi came to the Milvian Bridge venue in a possession, Father.Nicholas Gruner the Fatima Priest, carried the statue of Our Lady. Father Marco led the prayers in Latin.Representatives of other organisations were there too.

Mons. Ignacio Barreiro the Spiritual Director of Militia Christi was hospitalised on Saturday. His condition has improved it was announced today.Father.Marco praised him for his service to the traditionalist community. -Lionel Andrades 
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/10/1700-th-anniversary-for-apparition-to.html

Chi Rho - The Sign that Constantine saw in the sky

Chi Rho

From Wikipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

The Chi-Rho symbol
The Chi Rho (/ˈk ˈr/; also known as chrismon or sigla[1]) is one of the earliest forms of christogram, formed by superimposing the first two (capital) letters—chi and rho (ΧΡ)—of the Greek word ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ (Christos) in such a way that the vertical stroke of the rho intersects the center of the chi.[2]
The Chi-Rho symbol was used by the Roman emperor Constantine I (r. 306–337) as part of a military standard (vexillum). Constantine's standard was known as the Labarum. Early symbols similar to the Chi Rho were the Staurogram (Christliche Symbolik (Menzel) I 193 2.jpg) and the IX monogram (Christliche Symbolik (Menzel) I 193 4.jpg).
In pre-Christian times, the Chi-Rho symbol was also to mark a particularly valuable or relevant passage in the margin of a page, abbreviating chrēston(good).[3] Some coins of Ptolemy III Euergetes (r. 246–222 BC) were marked with a Chi-Rho.[4]
Although formed of Greek characters, the device (or its separate parts) is frequently found serving as an abbreviation in Latin text, with endings added appropriate to a Latin noun, thus XPo, signifying Christo, "to Christ", the dative form of Christus.[5]
The Chi Rho symbol has two Unicode codepointsU+2627  CHI RHO in the Miscellaneous symbols block and U+2CE9  COPTIC SYMBOL KHI RO in the Coptic block.

Origin and adoption

According to Lactantius,[6] a Latin historian of North African origins saved from poverty by the Emperor Constantine I (r. 306–337), who made him tutor to his son Crispus, Constantine had dreamt of being ordered to put a "heavenly divine symbol" (Latincoeleste signum dei) on the shields of his soldiers. The description of the actual symbol chosen by Emperor Constantine the next morning, as reported by Lactantius, is not very clear: it closely resembles a Chi-Rho or a staurogram (Christliche Symbolik (Menzel) I 193 2.jpg), a similar Christian symbol. That very day Constantine's army fought the forces of Maxentius and won the Battle of the Milvian Bridge (312), outside Rome.

Emperor Constantine's labarum, a standard incorporating the wreathed Chi-Rho, from an antique silver medal.
Eusebius of Caesarea (died in 339) gave two different accounts of the events. In his church history, written shortly after the battle, when Eusebius hadn't yet had contact with Constantine, he doesn't mention any dream or vision, but compares the defeat of Maxentius (drowned in the Tiber) to that of the biblical pharaoh and credits Constantine's victory to divine protection.
In a memoir of the Roman emperor that Eusebius wrote after Constantine's death (On the Life of Constantine, circa 337–339), a miraculous appearance is said to have come in Gaul long before the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. In this later version, the Roman emperor had been pondering the misfortunes that befell commanders who invoked the help of many different gods, and decided to seek divine aid in the forthcoming battle from the One God. At noon, Constantine saw a cross of light imposed over the sun. Attached to it, in Greek characters, was the saying "Τούτῳ Νίκα!" (“In this sign you will conquer!”).[7] Not only Constantine, but the whole army saw the miracle. That night, Christ appeared to the Roman emperor in a dream and told him to make a replica of the sign he had seen in the sky, which would be a sure defence in battle.
Eusebius wrote in the Vita that Constantine himself had told him this story "and confirmed it with oaths" late in life "when I was deemed worthy of his acquaintance and company." "Indeed", says Eusebius, "had anyone else told this story, it would not have been easy to accept it."
Eusebius also left a description of the labarum, the military standard which incorporated the Chi-Rho sign, used by Emperor Constantine in his later wars against Licinius.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi_Rho

Image result for Chi Rho sign on altar of Catholic Mass

Image result for Chi Rho sign on altar of Catholic Mass





Chi-Rho symbol at the Catacombs of Calixtus, Rome.



Monogramme of Christ (the Chi Rho) on a plaque of a sarcophagus, 4th-century CE, marble, Musei Vaticani, on display in a temporary exhibition at the Colosseum in Rome, Italy



The Chi-Rho with a wreath symbolizing the victory of the Resurrection, above Roman soldiers, circa 350.


Roman Christian mosaic with Chi-Rho, Hinton St. Mary, England.



Chi-Rho on the roof of the Basilica of St. John Lateran, Rome.

Image result for Chi Rho sign on altar of Catholic Mass




Repost : It was Christ himself who told Constantine the Great to fight in his name. God is not indifferent but active in our history- Roberto de Mattei

OCTOBER 30, 2012


It was Christ himself who told Constantine the Great to fight in his name. God is not indifferent but active in our history- Roberto de Mattei














Pof. Roberto de Mattei was speaking yesterday at a Conference on Constantine the Great(Costantino il Grande).It was  organised by the Lepanto Foundation and held  near St.Peter's Basilica. It marked  the 1700th anniversary of the battle at the Milvian Bridge (Ponte Milvio).

Prof. Roberto de Mattei said that this was the first time ever that the Cross of Christ appeared to a Sovereign before a battle.It confirms that God is not indifferent but active in our history.

No Holy War was held under the apparition of a Cross. This was the first Holy War for Christians. They fought in the name of the one true God.It was Christ himself who told Constantine to fight in his name.

The sign in the sky was seen by the whole army and not just Constantine.All saw the sign with the words. They did not doubt.The prodigy was not finished here. The second vision was seen only by Constantine in a dream.

The era of Constantine ended the epoch of the catacombs and was a time of liberty for the Church.Before in thousands Christians were tortured, decapitated and exiled. The Collosium, he said, is a symbol of years of persecution.

Ironically at Vatican Council II,Prof.Mattei observed, Yves Congar said that the Church has exited from the Constantine period.

Today the Faith cannot be proclaimed aloud but has to be kept private.Diocletian lives today, he said but so does Constantine.

The Communists today want a mere Christianity, without Constantine.

The persecution in present times  is juridical, psychological and spiritual.Throughout the world Christians are persecuted and the life of every Christian is one of struggle.

Let us pray for a militant spirit, he said, like Constantine.

Prof. Massimo Viglione presented a brief history of Constantine and his times. He said that on the Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross last month Pope Benedict XVI remembered Constantine. -Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/10/it-was-christ-himself-who-told.html

Image result for Milvian Bridge rome today

Constantine the Great and the Battle at the Milvian Bridge remembered

Image result for Domus Australia chapel front rome
Many people do not know that on Oct 28 ( next Sunday) is the anniversary of the Battle of the Milvian bridge, Rome.Before the battle Constantine saw a Catholic sign from Heaven which assured him of victory.Before that Christianity( Catholic Church) was persecuted and existed only underground. This was the interesting reminder after Holy Mass in English offered by the Australian priest, today morning at the Domus Australia chapel, Rome.-L.A

Photos https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/09/inexplicable-censorship-vatican.html
_________________________


Battle of Milvian Bridge


Battle of Milvian Bridge

Edit: in 312 on October 28th, the Emperor Constantine defeated the forces of Maxentius at the Battle of Milivian Bridge.  His victory was not only decisive in a political sense, but in a religious dimension as well since Constantine attributed his victory the divine intervention, more specifically, the intervention of Christ.  This victory and Constantine's own conversion and personal intervention in later passing the Edict of Toleration, led to the triumph of Christianity over pagan Rome.
http://eponymousflower.blogspot.it/

________________________________________




Canonist Peter Vere's Cushingite understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II is now obsolete : so is his Letter to the St.Benedict Center


Canon lawyer Peter Vere's positive comment on how ' a loyal disciple of Father Leonard Feeney can be a Catholic in good standing' 1 is appreciated.However in hs letter 2  his philosophy and theology is Cushingite ( invisible non Catholics are physically visible) instead of Feeneyite( invisible non Catholics in 2018 are always physically invisible).
So since his premise( invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc are visible) is faulty his inference and theology will also be skewered.He chooses Cushingite theology ( outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation) instead of traditional Feeneyite theology( outside the Church there is no known salvation, there is no visible salvation to contradict EENS).
Fr:Richard Shamruk a priest of the Archdiocese of Boston and Bishop Bernard Flanagan of Worcester,mentioned in Peter Vere's letter,  were both Cushingites.Invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD); baptism of blood( BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) were objective exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is how Peter Vere also interprets BOD,BOB and I.I.
Image result for Photo of Canon lawyer Peter Vere
Peter Vere, like Fr. Lawrence A Deery,JCL, the Judicial Vicar and Vicar for Canonical Affairs of the Diocese of Worcester,USA, mentioned by Vere, affirmed the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is Cushingite. It assumes invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. This is irrational.So in their Profession of Faith they re-interpret the Nicene Creed with Cushingite concepts.
This was approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctine of the Faith(CDF). Since for him too invisible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I were visible exceptions to the dogma EENS. So in two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican he rejected the strict interpretation of EENS. He was assisted by Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj, who is now the Prefect of the CDF.
Image result for Photo of Canon lawyer Peter Vere
Similarly Msgr.Camille Perl, like the present ecclesiastics at Ecclesia Dei interpret EENS and also Vatican Council II, since it is politically correct with the Left.
Image result for Photo of Canon lawyer Peter Vere
If they chose Feeneyite philosophy and theology ( according to L.A) then Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church nor with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The theological and doctrinal position of the spiritual descendents of Fr. Leonard Feeney on Vatican Council II may be controversial but on EENS they did not presume that there were practical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.They did not infer like Peter Vere, that there were literal cases of BOD, BOB and I.I which were exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Image result for Photo of Canon lawyer Peter Vere
This is the error today also of Cardinal Raymond Burke, Prefect Emeritus of the Apostolic Signatura, Vatican, who interprets EENS and Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism. 
-Lionel Andrades

1

Canonical Opinion on the Status of Father Feeney’s Doctrinal Position — The professional opinion of a competent canon lawyer on whether a loyal disciple of Father Leonard Feeney can be a Catholic in good standing. This is a letter from Mr. Peter Vere, J.C.L., who obtained his Licentiate of Canon Law from the Faculty of Canon Law at Saint Paul University. As a Catholic writer, canonist and apologist, his work has appeared in numerous Catholic publications, including Surprised by Truth 3. He is the co-author of Surprised by Canon Law: 150 Questions Catholics Ask About Canon Law and More Catholic Than the Pope. Additionally, Mr. Vere is the lecturing professor for the Masters-level course in Canon Law offered by the Catholic Distance University.
http://catholicism.org/downloads.html

1

http://www.catholicism.org/downloads/Peter_Vere_SBC.pdf




Present magisterium is Cushingite interprets magisterial documents with an irrational premise : manifest heresy for 16th century magisterium
https://gloria.tv/article/za3VJt1JVqxQ2ZqtoCmvHgu97