From Twitter
Fr.Leonard
Feeney was excommunicated for affirming the traditional interpretation of the
dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He
did not say that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance were visible examples of salvation outside the Church and
exceptions for EENS.
The
excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney was political. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
too was excommunicated for not accepting Vatican Council II with invisible
cases of LG 14 and 16 being allegedly visible examples of salvation outside the
Church and a break with EENS.
Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney were excommunicated because they did not
accept the irrational and heretical interpretation of Lumen Gentium 14( baptism
of desire) and Lumen Gentium 16( saved in invincible ignorance) y the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican and the Left. They
both had to accept invisible people as being being visible. Then they had to
infer that these were known cases.
So the CDF has
issued a Decree of Prohibitions against Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves
of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St.Benedict Center, in Richmond, New
Hampshire, USA, for not accepting invisible cases of being saved in invincible
ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
Also the Society
of St. Pius X(SSPX) were not granted canonical recognition by Pope Benedict
XVI, who said it was a doctrinal issue, since the SSPX had to accept Vatican
Council II as a break with EENS and not a continuity with EENS. They had to
confuse what is invisible as being visible, as did the popes.
The Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas and the
Most Holy Family Monastery of Peter and Michael Dimond in the USA, are not
being invited into the Church by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. Since they all have to
interpret LG 14 and 16 irrationally to create a break with Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus
of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc, as do the CDF and the present two popes.
If the Franciscans
of the Immaculate would interpret Vatican Council II with invisible cases of LG
14 and 16 as being physically visible exceptions for 12th century EENS they
would hold the same Cushingite doctrinal position of the CDF and the
political popes.
The CMRI and
MHFM cannot be invited into the Church since they are not liberals who confuse
physically invisible cases as being physically visible as did Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger and Pope John Paul II and now Pope Francis.
So today Life
Site News and the German bishops interpret Vatican Council II with invisible
cases of LG 14 and 16 being visible exceptions for the 12th century strict
interpretation of EENS. They are liberals and so will not receive the political
excommunication of the popes.
If they affirm
LG 14 and 16 as being physically invisible cases and say that they accept
Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS they could
be politically excommunicated. The present two popes have accepted Vatican
Council II interpreted irrationally.
There is no
apology from the Jesuits for expelling Fr. Leonard Feeney from their community.
The Jesuits today accept LG 14 and 16 as being physically visible examples of
salvation outside the Church and so Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 are objective
exceptions for EENS, as , EENS was interpreted by St. Ignatius of Loyola.
The Jesuits
today also accept Vatican Council II being a break with Ignatian EENS since invisible
cases of LG 14 and 16 are physically visible for them. If they were invisible
then they could not be objective examples of salvation outside the Church
and practical exceptions for EENS.
So we have a
convoluted theology in the Church with what is physically invisible being
mistaken as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church in the
present times. This is the basis for the liberalism in faith and morals and is
called 'the spirit of Vatican Council II'.
If the Franciscans of the Immaculate say physically invisible cases are
invisible only they could be excommunicated for saying the obvious. There is a
prohibition on saying what is invisible is only invisible. The popes follow this rule. Invisibile people are visibile?
Upholding the
invisible people are visible confusion is the green pass for a Catholic to not
be excommunicated. The St.Benedict Center in New Hampshire would not say this.
So a Decree of Prohibitions has been issued against them. They interpret the
baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible ignorance (II) like the saints Thomas
Aquinas and Augustine- and not like the CDF.
Now with 'the
reverse excommunication policy' the traditionalists and those who oppose the
innovation in the Synods could be placed outside the Church. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney
were excommunicated for their orthodoxy.
There was a
political and false excommunication of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and
Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston. The baptism of desire and being saved in
invincible ignorance always refers to physically invisible cases. So how could
they be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS? -Lionel Andrades
Bishop Michael Olsen, Dr. Taylor Marshall, Michael G.King and the faculty at the Fisher More College were interpreting Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise, when the Latin Mass was banned
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/bishop-michael-olsenand-dr-taylor.html
Young Germans must produce a video showing how Bishop George Batzing is dishonest
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/young-germans-must-produce-video.html
How can Bishop Georg Batzing continue to interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise to create a break with Catholic Tradition. This is unethical even by secular standards. How can he be trusted on other issues, finances etc.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/how-can-bishop-batzing-continue-to.html
Michael Lofton on Church Militant TV supports heresy and schism. It is with the False Premise that he gets his politically-correct liberalism
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/11/can-church-teach-heresy-analyzing.html