eucharistandmission: Feb 22, 2022

Tuesday, February 22, 2022

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) Assistant Secretary does not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. Malta's seminaries, religious communities and catechists do the same

-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

Malta’s bishops conferences, seminaries and religious communities are following the Assistant Secretary of the CDF Archbishop Charles Scicluna and not publically correcting the error

The Catholic Bishops Conference in Malta, like Archbishop Charles Scicluna, the Adjunct Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational and not rational premise, and the conclusion is nontraditional instead of traditional. Malta’s bishops conferences, seminaries and religious communities are following the Assistant Secretary of the CDF and not publically correcting the error. -Lionel Andrades

The editors of Il Messaggero, la Reppublica, Correira della Serra and daily Avvenire interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational and not Rational Premise. There reports on the Council are naive.

The editors of Il Messaggero, la Reppublica, Correira della Serra and daily Avvenire interpret Vatican Council II with an Irrational and not Rational Premise. There reports on the Council are naive.

WHAT IS THE RATIONAL PREMISE?

The Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 says outside the Church there is no salvation and we know that there are no physically visible cases of being saved with the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance in 1965-2022.So CCC 847-848 (invincible ignorance) is not a practical exception for CCC 846.This is the rational approach. Invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance are invisible in 2022.This is the Rational Premise (invisible cases are invisible).The Irrational Premise is invisible cases are visible. LG 16 refers to a physically visible case in 2022.

So with the Rational Premise CCC 847-848 does not contradict CCC 846 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. It is in harmony with the past Magisterium. There is no schism or heresy with the Rational Premise.

There is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition (EENS etc) when the Rational Premise is chosen. EENS today is the same as it was the for Jesuits in the 16the century since there are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II.There is no development of doctrine. The ecclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church in the Patristic period and the Middle Ages is the same as today with Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise. There is no rupture with the ecclesiology and theology of Holy Mass today in all rites today and that of the Roman Missal over the centuries, before 1965.

- Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 7, 2020

If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition

If Prof. Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School would interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise of the New Theology, the Italian Government may not continue to finance him.He would be taking the Catholic Church back to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades

John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/john-xxiii-foundation-for-religious.html

FEBRUARY 22, 2020

Italian Government finances Alberto Melloni's Bologna School with a million euros annually : it uses a false premise, inference and conclusion to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition

The Italian government is funding Alberto Melloni's John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the headquarters of the so-called "Bologna School,"1 guaranteed another yearly million-euro funding for 2020–2022.Melloni uses the irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II. It is only with a false premise, inference and conclusion that he makes the Council a rupture with Tradition. He could choose the rational premise, inference and conclusion.

_________________________________________

___________________________________________

________________

JANUARY 3, 2020

John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/john-xxiii-foundation-for-religious.html

_________________________________________

___________________________________________

With this rational model, the Vatican, the Bologna School, Archbishop Pegro and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi , would not be contradicting the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

ATHANASIUS CREED

'Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly...'

___________________________________

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-political-party-lega-salvini-needs.html

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII and the following popes, interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with a false premise.Pope Paul VI and the following popes interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.

Now Pope Francis interprets the Creeds and Vatican Council Ii with the false premise and so creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition on ecumenism, traditional ecclesiocentic mission, liturgy with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and traditional ecclesiology.It's a different Catholic Church now.The whole Church is following him in the error, conservatives and liberals.

Bishop Schneider, Maike Hickson and John Henry Weston continue to interpret LG 8 and UR 3 in Vatican Council II as exceptions to EENS. Bishop Bernard Fellay did this continously. He never corrected himself. He probably will go to the end of his life, with this error, like Fr.Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari.

If the popes interpret the Creeds without the false premise, like me, they would be opposed by the Jewish Left.There would be persecution.Now there is support.

The two popes do not affirm the Creeds to avoid a persecution of the Church. They have changed the faith-teachings of the Church.

So the official Profession of Faith and Oath of Office for Cardinals, Bishops, Rectors, Superiors and Parish Priests are mere words supporting heresy and dissent.

-Lionel Andrades

______________________________

MARCH 5, 2020

All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII( Bologna School )of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.

Gabriele Albonetti of the Leftist Partito Democratico is member of the Board of Trustees of Melloni's Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII, also called the Bologna School.

Melloni does not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise, for then the Council would support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Melloni's talks on Lutheranism would then be false.His talk on Italian society today being based on Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally , is also false.His talks on the Council supporting the liberalism of Pope Francis is also false.The interpretation of Vatican Council II with the irrationality, is now obsolete.

-Lionel Andrades

http://www.fscire.it/index.php/it/
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/

_________________________

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2020

La Scuola di Bologna sul Concilio Vaticano II dello storico Alberto Melloni è finanziata ogni anno dal governo di sinistra italiano quando interpreta il Concilio con una irrazionale premessa, inferenza e conclusione per respingere il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus se è stato interpretato di papi Italiani nel corso dei secoli

La Scuola di Bologna sul Concilio Vaticano II dello storico Alberto Melloni è finanziata ogni anno dal governo di sinistra italiano quando interpreta il Concilio con una irrazionale premessa, inferenza e conclusione per respingere il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus se è stato interpretato nel papi Italiani nel corso dei secoli.

-Lionel Andrades