Originally posted on February 2, 2020
Fr.Aidan Nicols Dominican Master of Sacred Theology has authored The Theology of Joseph Ratzinger (1988) and like the pope interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion. This is a fault line in the books of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict pubished by Ignatius Press.Pope Benedict and Fr. Nicols need to stop promoting their books with the misinformation.
the books of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict pubished by Ignatius Press.Pope Benedict and Fr. Nicols need to stop promoting their books with the misinformation.
All the books published by Oxford University Press and Blackfriars carries the Cushingite error.
Nicols was a Lecturer in Dogmatics and Ecumenics at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome.
In April 2019, Nichols was among nineteen Catholic Cushingite scholars and clergy who signed a 20-page open letter to the bishops of the world accusing Cushingite Pope Francis of heresy.
There is no comment from Nicols or the new Dominican Master General on this issue.It is unethical for them to continue with the error even after being informed.
They need to pull down their books on Vatican Council II and write new ones, without the false premise, inference and conclusion.
They would then be affirming the ecclesiology of the Church according to St. Dominic,St.Catherine of Siena, Raymond of Capua and the other Dominicans over the centuries who affirmed exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 1, 2020
JANUARY 7, 2020
The Master General of the Dominicans, Fr. Gerard Francisco Timoner III cannot issue a statement or clarification since he does not have the faith, or he could be removed from office, for expressing it.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-father-general-of-dominicans-fr.html
JANUARY 14, 2020
Ignatius Press needs to pull back Pope Benedict's book on ecclesiology since it was written with a false interpretation of Vatican Council II.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-pull-back-pope.html
JANUARY 21, 2020
Ignatius Press needs to stop publishing books on Vatican Council II by authors who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Books written by Pope Benedict also carry this error https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-stop-publishing.html
Ignatius Press needs to stop publishing books on Vatican Council II by authors who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Books written by Pope Benedict also carry this error https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-stop-publishing.html
JANUARY 14, 2020
Attention Jesuits : Before you write new books on Vatican Council II please do not make this mistake ( Graphics ) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/attention-jesuits-before-you-write-new.html
NOVEMBER 12, 2019
At Oxford University 50 years after Vatican Council II they still do not have an insight into their collective error.Students at Oxford, thousands of them, did not think correctly and were going along with the masses, in their error. This centre of learning was in ignorance. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/at-oxford-university-england-professors.htmlNOVEMBER 11, 2019 
The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council II based upon a false premise. A deceptive rupture is created with Catholic Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-oxford-university-press-has.html OCTOBER 27, 2019
Books on Vatican Council II should not receive the Imprimatur: authors interpret the Council with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/books-on-vatican-council-ii-should-not.html OCTOBER 15, 2019When you read Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma or Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Roberto dei Mattei and John Hardon's books, be attentive.They accepted the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) error. So their theology is off the rails.They had to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.This is a major theological error. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/when-you-read-ludwig-otts-fundamentals.html
Attention Jesuits : Before you write new books on Vatican Council II please do not make this mistake ( Graphics ) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/attention-jesuits-before-you-write-new.html
NOVEMBER 12, 2019
At Oxford University 50 years after Vatican Council II they still do not have an insight into their collective error.Students at Oxford, thousands of them, did not think correctly and were going along with the masses, in their error. This centre of learning was in ignorance. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/at-oxford-university-england-professors.htmlNOVEMBER 11, 2019
OCTOBER 27, 2019
Books on Vatican Council II should not receive the Imprimatur: authors interpret the Council with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/books-on-vatican-council-ii-should-not.html OCTOBER 15, 2019When you read Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma or Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Roberto dei Mattei and John Hardon's books, be attentive.They accepted the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) error. So their theology is off the rails.They had to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.This is a major theological error. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/when-you-read-ludwig-otts-fundamentals.html
OCTOBER 11, 2019
Do not read these books : their new theololgy is the same as that of the Amazon Synod https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/do-not-read-these-books-their-new.html
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
Operation Dustbin
NOVEMBER 16, 2019
Most of the books on Vatican Council II should not be there in the public and pontifical libraries . They should be sent back to the publishers if it is possible.They use a false premise and inference and then conclude with various new theories.Fr. Hans Kung sj is an example. So is Cardinal Walter Kasper.Their books should be removed from the libraries for being deceptive or the writers innocently being in ignorance.
NOVEMBER 16, 2019
Clearer Vatican II vision by Paul Lakeland uses an outdated theology : the Catholic Church has moved forward
NOVEMBER 14, 2019
Fr.Hans Kung's books, which unethically use a false premise, to create a non traditional conclusion, are available at the Legion of Christ university, in Rome(UPRA)
NOVEMBER 12, 2019
Gavin D'Costa's book published by the Oxford University Press has a philosophical and theological flaw
NOVEMBER 5, 2019
Before the Jesuits write new books on Vatican Council II someone has to inform them that LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only in 2019 and they are not real and known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology, LG 16 and GS 22 are not practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and there is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.
OCTOBER 29, 2019
Such a staggering thought.All those thousands of books, numerous, written on Vatican Council II have a major theological error. They should be thrown into the dustbin- O'Malley, Kasper, Faggioli,Gherardini,Mattei, Ferrara.They violate Newton's laws of physics and Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction.
OCTOBER 28, 2019
Repost : Books to avoid - Fenton and Hardon's theology is off the rails
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/repost-books-to-avoid-fenton-and.html
AUGUST 25, 2019
Many Catholic books on salvation and Vatican Council II are written with irrational Cushingite philosophy and theology
OCTOBER 28, 2019
All the books on Vatican Council II that have been published could probably have an error in the interpretation of the Council, in its 16 basic documents.Lumen Gentium, Nostra Aetate,Ad Gentes, Unitatitis Redintigratio, Gaudium et Specs etc were are all interpreted with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition. Hypotheticals were assumed to be objective people saved outside the Church.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-that.html
OCTOBER 27, 2019
Books on Vatican Council II should not receive the Imprimatur: authors interpret the Council with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition
________________________
JANUARY 26, 2018
Hilary White and Massimo Faggioli interpret the Catechism, Vatican Council II and Letter of the Holy Office with hypothetical cases not being hypothetical : so there is a rupture with Tradition (with graphics)
FALSE PREMISE DEFINED
Their false premise is:-1. Invisible people are visible.2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking who are saved outside the Church.8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.
FALSE PREMISE DEFINED
Their false premise is:-
1. Invisible people are visible.
2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.
3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.
4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.
5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking who are saved outside the Church.
8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.
9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.
10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ?https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-and-massimo.html
With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.
3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.
2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.
3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
Posts
