Saturday, May 15, 2021

Doctrinal issues for the Comitato dell Immacolata at Casalotti, Boccea Rome




 The Commitato dell Immacolata, is the organisation which oversees the property of the Fransciscans of the Immaculate.This includes the old seminary building along side a church, in Boccea, Rome.They reached an agreement with the former bishop of Porta Santa Rufina. They generously permitted the church alongside the seminary to function.However the Comitato dell Immacolata, objected to the presence of the priests of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate. The agreement was that the F.I priests, who offered only Holy Mass in Italian, at the parish church in Casalotti, Boccea,  would not offer Holy Mass there.

So for nearly a year I have not seen the F.I priests offer Mass in the parish.

Fr. Giuseppe Grioni F.I, former Parish Priest and Fr. Rosario Samarco F.I , former Rector of the seminary, no more offer Mass at the new church, adjoining the seminary building.

Bishop Gino Reali, who is now bishop emeritus, approved a Brazilian community to offer Holy Mass in only Italian.They also  take care of the pastoral needs of the parish.

There are still problems however which the Comitato dell Immacolata could address.

EUCHARIST PROFANED

1.Bishop Gino Reali and the Franciscans of the Immaculate community, approved the Eucharist being given to non Christians,in general. Catholic women who live in the parish with non Christians,in general, can receive the Eucharist.The women are in mortal sin and public adultery and their husbands are outside the Catholic Church, and follow other religions in public.The marriages are not a Sacrament.

The same policy of the past is being followed today.

VATICAN COUNCIL II, THE CREEDS AND CATECHISMS INTERPRETED WITH A FALSE PREMISE IN THE PARISH

2.Bishop Gino Reali and the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion, like the present two popes. So a false rupture is created with Tradition ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc ).

They were informed many times that they interpret Vatican Council II, Creeds etc with the false premise instead of without it.So they could avoid the false rupture with Tradition.But until today the priests will not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and traditionally.

THEY DO NOT ASK THE PEOPLE TO MAKE JESUS THE CENTRE OF ALL POLITICS

3.Since the priests at Casalotti, do not interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion and so affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),they cannot affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation in Italy.This was taught in Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI.We want Jesus to be the center of all political legislation in Italy.

CATECHISM BASED UPON THE FALSE NEW THEOLOGY CREATED WITH THE FAKE PREMISE.

4.Since they interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise and not the rational option, the Catechism programs in the parish, like those in the diocese,  do not affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church,as taught by the popes and saints over the centuries in Italy.It's a false Catechesis.

These are doctrinal issues which need to be addressed by the Comitato dell Immacolato and also all Catholics.

The Novus Ordo Mass is offered with the new false ecclesiology created with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Even if the Latin Mass was offered in the parish, as at the time when Fr. Settimo Mannelli F.I, was the Rector of the seminary and parish priest at the church Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea, it would be a Mass with the fake theology and false ecclesiology.The theology of the Mass would still be a rupture with that of the Traditional Latin Mass of , for example, the 16th century.So it would not be the same Holy Mass of the past, it would  not be the same ' Mass of the centuries'.

PRIESTS NEED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY TO TAKE THE PARISH BACK TO TRADITION

If the Brazilian priests would inteRpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, inference and conclusion, they would be saying all need to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church for salvation.There would be no known exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. There would be none mentioned in Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church.They would ask all to enter the Catholic Church. This would be their Mission and Evangelisation.

MEMBERSHIP IN THE CHURCH MUST BE A PRIORITY FOR SALVATION AND THIS HAS TO BE PROCLAIMED

This would be the priority for all people to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.In general all would need to convert into the Catholic Church, with faith and the baptism of water(Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II ).The Church would be like the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (CCC 845).

PRIESTS NEED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALL AND THEN AFFIRM THE SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING IN ALL POLITICS

With Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church being affirmed today, they could ask the people, the Italians, to vote only for the political parties or political candidates, who are Catholic.They must vote only for Catholic political parties example Forza Nuova, Militia Christi etc, who affirm the necessity of having Jesus, as known and taught in the Catholic Church ,at the center of politics.They must tell the people that it is a mortal sin to vote for candidates who support public mortal sins.

The present Brazilian Joselitos Christo priests, like the former Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate priests, are good priests - caring and compassionate, but they seem to  respond to pressures from secular forces.-Lionel Andrades




Seminario Nazionale dei Vita Nuova nello Spirito

For the popes and the Society of St. Pius X - BOD and I.I contradict Feeneyite EENS.So they view them as objective cases in 1965-2021.Where are these objective cases, who has seen or met them? There are none.

 I accept the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance and also Feneeyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).They are compatible. It does not have to be 'either-or'.Since for me being saved with the baptism of desire(BOD) or invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to only hypothetical cases, always. They cannot be anything else for us.Invisible people in 2021 cannot be practical examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. They cannot be objective exceptions to EENS and the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.But for the popes and the Society of St. Pius X - BOD and I.I contradict Feeneyite EENS.So they view BOD and I.I, as being objective cases in the present times(1965-2021).Where are these objective cases, who has seen or met them? There are none.

I avoid this mistake.So Vatican Council II is traditional for me. Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium 14( baptism of desire) are not practical exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. The old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church is intact even after Vatican Council II, for me.There is no pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiology for me. There is no hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition for me. The theology of the Church is still the same since I do not use the false premise to create a false rupture with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades








#AmiciDiGesù​​​​​​​​​​ - Giornata di Spirituality -Nostra Signora di Fatima -Adorazione Eucaristica

In preparazione al 40° anniversario delle apparizioni della Regina della Pace

Catholic school students should not interpret Magisterial documents ( Vatican Council II, Catechisms and Creeds , EENS etc) with an irrational premise, inference and non traditional conclusion and consider this the teaching of the Holy Spirit

 Pope Francis cannot make an objective and factual mistake and indicate that this is the teaching of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit cannot contradict the past Magisterium. There is no new revelation to indicate that this has happened. The pope cannot interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and then suggest that the non traditional conclusion is a development of doctrine.So Catholic school students should not interpret Magisterial documents ( Vatican Council II, Catechisms and Creeds , EENS etc) with an irrational premise, inference and non traditional conclusion and consider this the teaching of the Holy Spirit.

Pope Francis is not Magisterial on Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms. He used a false premise to interpret these Church documents, as do the Cardinals, Bishops Conferences, National Catechetical Centers,Canonists, Vatican Tribunal and authors and publishers of books on Vatican Council II.No one denies this at the Vatican or the pontifical universities, which are teaching objective error that is not Magisterial. -Lionel Andrades


https://thedialog.org/vatican-news/pope-francis-establishes-formal-ministry-says-being-a-catechist-is-a-vocation/

Commento al messaggio straordinario dell'8 maggio 2021 di Don Gianfranco Priori