Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis have interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. This is heresy.

Lumen Gentium 8 is always invisible.

Lumen Gentium 16 always refers to an invisible person.

Unitatis Redintigratio 3 always refers to an invisible person.

Gaudium et Specs in its entire text always refers to an unknown person.

Nostra Aetate 2 always refers to a hypothetical case.

Lumen Gentium 14 refers to an uknown case of the catechumen who dies before receiving the baptism of water and is saved.

So Vatican Council II no where contradicts the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athansius Creed or the Nicene and Apostles Creed. The Council supports Tradition.

But for Pope Paul VI, the Council was a rupture with de fide teachings of the Church. This is heresy. Did Pope Paul VI have a right to be a pope ? Could a pope in heresy still be a pope?

For all the cardinals Vatican Council II was a rupture with Tradition on de fide teachings.Could a cardinal in heresy remain a cardinal according to Canon Law ?

Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis have interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. This is heresy.

A pope in heresy ceases to be the pope according to St.Robert Bellarmine we are told by sedevacantists who also interpret the Council irrationally and in heresy.

So was the Seat of St.Peter vacant because of a general innocent ignorance? No, not for me.

Should not the popes and the present cardinals and bishops correct the error and end the confusion?

They could announce that Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Tradition.

It does not contradict exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. It does not contradict an ecumenism of return.

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949, they could announce, which Fr. Karl Rahner sj, placed in the Denzinger has an objective and factual error.-Lionel Andrades

What do we do when the present two popes are in manifest mortal sin ?

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict continue interpret Vatican Council II  as follows.

Lumen Gentium 8 is not always an invisible case, it is visible.So it is an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

Lumen Gentium 16 does not always refer to an invisible person, but to someone visible.So LG 16 is an exception to the past ecclesiology.

Gaudium et Specs 22 does not not always refer to an unknown person, but someone visible.

Unitatis Redintigratio 3 does not always refer to a hypothetical, speculative and unknown case. So UR 3 contradicts an ecumenism of return.

Nostra Aetate 2 does not always refer to a hypothetical case but some real and known person who is saved outside the Church.So non Christians do not always need to convert into the Catholic Church.

Lumen Gentium 14 does not always refer to a speculative case but some one saved in invincible ignorance etc outside the Church.LG 14 contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX.

So for them Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) for the present two popes and the Left.

With this irrationality, Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the dogma EENS.

Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Athanasius Creed on outside the Church there is no salvation.

Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, on exclusive salvation in the Church and an also an ecumenism of return.

Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Nicene Creed which does not say, 'I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire, blood and invincible ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.

Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Apostles Creed which refers to the Holy Spirit  and the Catholic Church.The Holy Spirit has always taught the Church that outside the Church there is no salvation.

But for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict and the Left this would be 'triumphalism'. So they reject this Magisterial teaching of the Church. The popes reject the Magisterium.

This is heresy.First class heresy.

It is an impediment  to offering Holy Mass.

It is a scandal.

To offer Holy Mass in this condition, without ending the scandal, could be a sacrilege for them.

St. Alphonsus Liguri, Father of Moral Theology says that if a priest in manifest mortal sin offers Holy Mass, do not go up to receive the Eucharist from him. In his Teologia Moralis, Book 3,  he says , if  you do go up to receive the Eucharist  you would be telling him all is well and cooperating in his sin.

He writes that unless it is an emergency, like not being able to fulfill ones Sunday obligation, and there is no other church nearby, do not go up to receive the Eucharst .

What do we do when the present two popes are in manifest mortal sins of faith?-Lionel Andrades 

December 7, 2019

All the popes since Pius XII to Francis have made this mistake. No cardinal or bishop has corrected the mistake. Not a single one. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/all-popes-since-pius-xii-to-francis.html

 

December 7, 2019

Popes and ecclesiastics today make an error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/popes-and-ecclesiastics-today-make.html 

 

December 6, 2019

Andrea Tornielli like Edward Pentin and the bishop of Regensburg promote the false theology, Cushingite theology of Pope Benedict, which is being followed by Pope Francis. 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/andrea-tornielli-like-edward-pentin-and.html

 

 

 

"A Medjugorje è Lei (la Madonna), non è la nostra immaginazione"

All the popes since Pius XII to Francis have made this mistake. No cardinal or bishop has corrected the mistake. Not a single one.

Lumen Gentium 8 is always invisible.

Lumen Gentium 16 always refers to an invisible person.

So being saved in invincible ignorance never ever was an exception to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

Lumen Gentium 14 always refers to an invisible person .

So being saved with the baptism of desire never ever was an exception to Feeneyite EENS.

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 has a mistake. Since it is assumed that invisible and unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance were practical exceptions to EENS, as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center.

All the popes since Pius XII to Francis have made this mistake.

No cardinal or bishop has corrected the mistake.

Not a single one. -Lionel Andrades

Pregate finché sono in vita perché se muoiono non ci sono più speranze

  

Popes and ecclesiastics today make an error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II

Lumen Gentium 8 is always invisible.

Unitatis Redintigratio 3 always refers to an invisible person in the present times.

Gaudium et Specs 22 always refers to an unknown person.

Nostra Aetate 2 always refers to a hypothetical case.

So Vatican Council II no where contradicts the traditional teaching on the Church having an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.

The Amazon Synod Working Paper was wrong when it rejected exclusive salvation based upon Vatican Council II.

Pope Francis made an error in the Abu Dhabi Declaration when he rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, based upon Vatican Council II.

He also made an error in Lumen Fidei.  1

 Pope Benedict made an error when he said extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) today ( March 2016, Avvenire) was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century since there was a development with Vatican Council II. 

Then the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia, made an error when they asked Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA  to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 847-848) as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.

The popes and cardinals at the Vatican are constantly interpreting Lumen Gentium 8 as not always being invisible.

Unitatis Redintigratio 3 does not always refer to an invisible person in the present times.

Gaudium et Specs 22 does not always refer to an unknown person.

Nostra Aetate 2 does not always refers to a hypothetical case.Since LG 8, UR 3, GS 22, NA 2 are exceptions to EENs for them. 

They are exceptions since they are visible people. Invisible people cannot be exceptions.

So they irrationally interpret the Council and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.-Lionel Andrades

1

July 12, 2013

 

 

There can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II Lumen Fidei has chosen the irrational one. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/07/there-can-be-two-interpretations-of.html

July 10, 2013

ENCYCLICAL LUMEN FIDEI IS BASED ON AN OBJECTIVE ERROR IN FAITH AND MORALS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/07/encyclical-lumen-fidei-is-based-on.html#links

July 9, 2013

Encyclical Lumen Fidei states faith is ecclesial but refers to 'Christians' instead of 'Catholics' 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/07/encyclical-lumen-fidei-states-faith-is.html

August 5, 2013

The Franciscans of the Immaculate will now have to accept that Protestants have 'ecclesial faith' as Pope Francis has stated in the encyclical Lumen Fidei

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-franciscans-of-immaculate-will-now.html 

 

 

July 11, 2013

Lumen Fidei is the ordinary magisterium: an oversight is possible 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/07/lumen-fidei-is-ordfinary-magisterium.html

 

August 4, 2013

SSPX and Lumen Fidei : no comment still https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/08/sspx-and-lumen-fidei-no-comment-still.html

 

 

Padre Slavko risponde alle curiosità dei pellegrini a Medjugorje

La Madonna ci ha dato, a me e Vicka, la missione di pregare per i malati

Un momento drammatico che ha vissuto la veggente Marija