The Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary in Boccea, Rome has been sold to a hotel chain.In October the demolition of the seminary building and church begins.

 

The Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary in Boccea, Rome has been sold to a hotel chain.In October the demolition of the seminary building and church begins.

It is learnt that the seminary closed by Pope Franics in 2013 has been sold to a company  which will develop the area.

DIVISION IN THE CHURCH CONTINUES

The division in the Church continues and Cardinal Braz de Avez announced that the Franciscans of the Immaculate must accept Vatican Council II, interpreted politically and so irrationally.Fr. Stefano Manelli ffi, the founder of the community was correct in rejecting the irrational version of the Council.So the community he founded was taken away from him. Now the seminary has been sold to professional developers.

SSPX CORRECTLY REJECTED VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL

 Even the Society of St. Pius (SPX) rightly rejected the unethical interpretation of Vatican Council II with a fake premise, irrational inference and nontraditional conclusion, approved by the Left.

The new administration of the FFI, approved by Pope Francis and the Commissar Cardinal Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj, interpret LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in the Council, as referring to objective examples of salvation in 1965-2023. So invisible cases of LG 8 etc are projected as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church  by the new FFI administration.In this wasy there has to be a false break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by the Council of Florence (1442) and the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). These Councils did not mention any exceptions.

With this ruse, the new administration of the FFI,  like Pope Francis and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) make the dogma EENS and the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, obsolete. Pope Francis and the DDF approve this creating schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium of the Catholic Church.

DUE TO THE DIVISION THE SEMINARY HAS BEEN LOST

They pretend that there is a break with Tradition when there really is no rupture with Tradition.

Due to this division in the Church the Franciscans of the Immaculate community was split in two and now the seminary has been handed over to a secular group.

It is common sense that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc can only refer to invisible and hypothetical cases for us human beings. If anyone was saved outside the Church it could only be known to God. So LG 8, 14, 16 etc are not objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, the ecclesiology of the 16 the century Roman Missal and the traditional lex orandi.

Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 affirm that all need faith and baptism for salvation. LG 14 is cited in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the title Outside the Church there is no salvation. CCC 845 states that God the Father wants all to be united in the Catholic Church, the Church is like the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood.So Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846, 1257 ) supports the Council of Florence on EENS and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not objective exceptions for AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 and the dogma EENS of the Councils in the Medieval period of the Catholic Church. 

Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.The Catechism of the Catholic Church, based upon Vatican Council II does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.St.Maximillian Kolbe ofm conv., affirmed Feeneyite EENS at his Cities of Mary.

CATECHISMS ARE FEENEYITE

CCC 847-848 ( invincible ignorance etc) do not contradict CCC 845-846 ( outside the Church there is no salvation).

CCC 1257 ( God is not limited to the Sacraments ) does not contradict CCC 1257( the Church knows of no means to eternal beatitude other than the baptism of water).

It is the same with other Catechisms. In the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 29Q-invincible ignorance) does not contradict 24Q and 27Q which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

1949 LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE (CDF/DDF) MADE AN OBJECITVE MISTAKE

 It is the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, followed by Pope Francis,  which has made an objective mistake. It assumed invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were visible exceptions for the dogma EENS. The mistake was picked up by Rahner, Ratzinger, Kung, Ottaviani and Lefebvre who are now obsolete.It is now meaningless to refer to Congar,Murray and Balthasar who were interpreting Vatican Council II without the rational premise  i.e invisible cases of LG 8,14, 16 etc.

RAHNER-RATZINGER THEOLOGY IS NOW OBSOLETE

However Pope Francis and the DDF, Vatican, continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rahner, Ratzinger, Kung and Lefebvre error. This was the false theology upon which was based the Abu Dhabi Declaration, Amoris Laetitia and Traditionis Custode. So the Franciscans of the Immaculate priests who offer only the Latin Mass are expected to follow these Church Documents for canonical recognition. 

FFI LATIN GROUP CENSORED, NO NEW VOCATIONS ALLOWED

The Latin group is not being allowed to accpet new vocations.Their  publishing house Casa Mariana Editrice, is still censored. Their missionary magazine Christ to the World/ Christo al Mondo is still banned by the Rome Vicariate since it supports the dogma EENS.

WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IT IS A RETURN AT THE NOVUS ORDO MASS TO THE OLD MISSAL 

It is being asked why the FFI must and Catholics at large interpret Vatican Council II irrationally when a rational and traditional option exists. Pope Francis must accept the Council rationally and so end the division in the Church. With Vatican Council II rational, priests who offer the Novus Ordo Mass will be affirming the exclusivist ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE OLD AND NEW MISSA IS CREATED WITH EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

The basic difference between the old and new Missal is the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is now known, that the Council interpreted rationally does not contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16^th century. So the Rahner, Ratzinger domination of theology over the last 60 years has ended.

-Lionel Andrades

JULY 17, 2023

Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary in Rome- windows open and cleaned, furniture removed

 

The seminary of the Franciscans of the Immaculate at Casalotti, Boccea has its windows open. The furniture within is removed. It is placed outside the seminary. It is the same for the old church, which recently celebrated its 50 years. It has been in the possession of the Comitato dell Immaculata.

The wild bushes and other trees in front of the church have been removed.

This is the seminary Pope Francis closed in 2013, prohibited the Latin Mass and banned the lay Third Order of the community.The founder of the community Fr. Stefano Manelli ffi was removed by Pope Francis and replaced by Fr. Fidenzio Volpi.

Since then it is discovered that there is a Vatican Council II, Feeneyite and Cushingite, rational and irrational, with the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture and that Pope Francis has chosen the wrong option.

The Council morally, can only be Feeneyite. It has to be rational and so traditional. It has the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence.

So Vatican Council II, rational, traditional and Feeneyite is not a rupture with the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal and the traditional lex orandi.

The Council only supports the Roman Missal at every Mass and in all Rites . It is a return to the ecclesiology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Tridentine Rite Mass.

Even the Novus Ordo Mass can now only be offered with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, by the popes, cardinals and bishops.

When Pope Francis closed the seminary he wanted the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II, Cushingite. They refused. Cushingism is heretical and schismatic. It is unethical.

Pope Francis continued to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and with this error issued Amoris Laetitia, Traditionis Custode, the Abu Dhabi Declaration etc.

Now the Franciscans of the Immaculate can affirm Vatican Council II, Feeneyite, along with extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Feeneyite. They are compatible. The Council does not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism, there are no practical exceptions mentioned in the text of the Council for EENS.

So it is the liberals and Pope Francis who are in difficulty. Since they have to affirm a dishonest interpretation of Vatican Council II and the people know that they have a rational option which is traditional.

All the cardinal-electors for the next pope are expected to be honest and to interpret Vatican Council II, rationally. So the next pope and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, must accept Vatican Council II, Feeneyite only. This is morally obligatory.The DDF must interpret the Council only rationally and ask all the cardinals, the universities, the embassies, those participating in inter-religious dialogues and non Christian organisations to do the same. 

-Lionel Andrades

Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate Seminary: Closed by Order of Pope Francis.