Edward Pentin as a Catholic does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was known to the Magisterium in the 16th century. Since unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are personally known cases for him. So this is why he accepts BOD, BOB and I.I as being practical exceptions to EENS. This leads to heresy and sacrilege. Since with a mortal sin of faith he receives the Holy Eucharist at Mass on Sundays.
ERRORS, HERESY(POINTS IN RED)
1.With this irrational reasoning Pentin, Rome correspondent at the National Catholic Register, has changed the interpretation of EENS, which is no more strict and BOD-free, like it was know to the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.There is an innovation.
2.He has changed the understanding of the Creeds too.1
3. He has chosen an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
4.He interprets the Catechism as a rupture with the old Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.The catechisms contradict themselves. They also contradict a rational interpretation of EENS and Vatican Council II.
This is all heresy and it is public.To reject the original meaning of the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed, and that too with an irrational premise and inference, is first class heresy.
Receiving the Eucharist at Holy Mass without ending this public scandal would be a sacrilege.
Pentin has written on Confusion of Holy Communion for Protestant Spouses and other issues related to Holy Mass.
If he says that this is what the present two popes and the cardinals, teach then he could acknowledge that it is irrational, heretical, non traditional and not part of the Deposit of the Faith.
THOMAS MORE COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS, N.H
He could reject the error as a Catholic.He could clarify his doctrinal and theological position with these following points,which I asked the faculty at the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts,N.H,USA and informed Pentin about it.2
CLARIFY DOCTRINAL POSITION (POINTS IN BLUE)
1.Edward Pentin could state that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical cases only and are not objective exceptions to EENS in 2018.
2.He could affirm all the Creeds with BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions.
3.He could affirm Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc not being exceptions to EENS as it was interpreted by the Magisterium in the 16th century, guided by the Holy Spirit.
4.He could affirm all the Catechisms in harmony with traditional EENS.
5.He could acknowledge that to change the interpretation of the Creeds, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechisms by useing an irrational premise and inference with reference to BOD, BOB and I.I is heresy. It is now public heresy.It is a mortal sin of faith. It would be a scandal to attend Holy Mass,and receive the Eucharist in this condition. Absolution in the Sacrament of Reconciliation is needed and the scandal has to be ended in public.
AFFIRM ORTHODOXY
He could announce that he does not affirm the errors mentioned above ( points in red) and instead affirms orthodoxy on Catholic doctrine (points in blue) even when this is not the teaching of the present ecclesiastics and the two popes at the Vatican.They have made an objective mistake and he has not written about it. They violated the Principle of Non Contradiction and so cannot be magisterial on this issue.This error is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
He could announce that he does not affirm the errors mentioned above ( points in red) and instead affirms orthodoxy on Catholic doctrine (points in blue) even when this is not the teaching of the present ecclesiastics and the two popes at the Vatican.They have made an objective mistake and he has not written about it. They violated the Principle of Non Contradiction and so cannot be magisterial on this issue.This error is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
FR.THOMAS CREAN OP, ROME LIFE FORUM
Fr.Thomas Crean op is on the faculty of theThomas More College of Liberal Arts(TMC) and was a speaker at the Rome Life Forum in May 2018.He offers Holy Mass interpreting St. Thomas Aquinas as contradicting himself and Tradition.Like the Cushingite Dominicans, he holds the liberal position on Vatican Council II.It is interpreted as a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).He reaches this conclusion by using a false premise and inference.So the understanding of the Creeds are changed and there is a doctrinal mess.3
It is the same with Edward Pentin.
CATECHISM OF PIUS X CONTRADICTS ITSELF FOR THEM BUT NOT ME
The TMC faculty also teach the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Church for salvation. This Catechism is Feeneyite. Since when it mentions invincible ignorance, it is not a reference to a visible and practically known exception to EENS.But the Catechisms are interpreted with Cushingism.This is the teaching norm at TMC. So the Catechism of Pope Pius X would contradict the Syllabus of Errors ( ecuemnism of return etc.) The Catechisms and other Church documents are interpreted with the hermeneutic of rupture, even though a rational choice is available.
The TMC faculty also teach the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Church for salvation. This Catechism is Feeneyite. Since when it mentions invincible ignorance, it is not a reference to a visible and practically known exception to EENS.But the Catechisms are interpreted with Cushingism.This is the teaching norm at TMC. So the Catechism of Pope Pius X would contradict the Syllabus of Errors ( ecuemnism of return etc.) The Catechisms and other Church documents are interpreted with the hermeneutic of rupture, even though a rational choice is available.
This is the doctrine that the two popes and Fr. Thomas Crean reject by using a false premise and inference.It is the same with Edward Pentin.
1.Nicene Creed.
2.Athanasius Creed.
3.Apostles Creed.
4.Extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
5.Vatican Council II.
6.Catechism of the Catholic Church.
7.Catechism of the Council of Trent and other Catechisms.
HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY FOR ME
For me there is no rupture between Vatican Council II and the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. Similarly the Catechisms are also interpreted with the hermeneutic of continuity.
This would not be true for the Dominican priest and Edward Pentin.They reject EENS as it was known to the Jesuits in the 16th century. They reject EENS as it was known to St. Dominic.This is the norm for the Dominicans today.
I do not interpret the Creeds as contradicting themselves.This is an an error of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is irrational and heretical. However it is acceptable for the two popes, the CDF,the Domicans and the Catholic Edward Pentin.
I affirm EENS like the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.They do not do the same.
SACRILEGE
For me they are in public heresy and the popes, cardinals and bishops offer Holy Mass in sacrilege. In public they, like Fr. Crean op, will not affirm Magisterial documents of the Catholic Church rationally and traditionally.Instead they will choose a hermeneutic of rupture.
For me they are in public heresy and the popes, cardinals and bishops offer Holy Mass in sacrilege. In public they, like Fr. Crean op, will not affirm Magisterial documents of the Catholic Church rationally and traditionally.Instead they will choose a hermeneutic of rupture.
The Mass offered by the Dominican priest at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty.
Like the faculty of the Thomas More College(TMC) he rejects the Syllbus of Errors , Athanasius Creed, past catechisms, original understanding of the Nicene Creed,the dogma EENS and reinterpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition when it is not. 4
1
- 2
DECEMBER 11, 2018
No clarification or denial from Thomas More College of Liberal Arts : public heresy and sacrilege
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/no-clarification-or-denial-from-thomas.html
3
DECEMBER 10, 2018
Mass offered by the Dominican priest Fr.Thomas Crean at the TMC chapel may be valid but it is in scandal. There is an impediment which is not denied by the TMC faculty
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/so-mass-offered-by-dominican-priest.html
https://edwardpentin.co.uk/
http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin
4.
Posts
