When the False and not Rational Premise
is used to interpret Vatican Council II then the Council is politicized by the
Left.In the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA Fr. Georges de Laire interpreted the Council with a False Premise and placed a Decree of Prohibitions upon the St. Benedict Center New Hampshire for using the Rational Premise. Then in an interview with the Catholic Herald, U.K he did not talk about this theology.
Vatican Council II interpreted with a
Fake Premise to produce a Fake Rupture with Tradition is political Left
ideology in Austria and the rest of Europe. Cardinal Schonborn must interpret
Vatican Council II like Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall on
Lumen Gentium 14 ( the baptism of desire) being implicit and not literal cases
in the present times.
Vatican Council II interpreted with a
Fake Premise is leftist, politically correct, short sighted ideology. Young
people have a rational and traditional option.
It is also limited since it is based
upon the Council interpreted with the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition and
not the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
THERE ALREADY IS SCHISM WHEN THE POPES USE THE FALSE PREMISE
Holy Orders and the lay apostolate must
interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise otherwise their is politically correct schism.
There already is schism when the popes
interpret Vatican Council II politically with the False Premise, False Inference
and Non Traditional Conclusion. There is schism with the 16th
century Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed etc.
CARDINALS AND BISHOPS SHOULD RESIGN WHO CANNOT INTERPRET THE COUNCIL RATIONALLY
Cardinals and bishops who continue to
interpret the Council with an irrational and not rational premise, to
create a fake break with Tradition, must be asked to resign. It is dishonest and
not Catholic. Vatican Council II (Irrational) is supported by the Left.
The future popes will have to support
Tradition and put away Traditionis Custode since rationally and ethically,
Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms can only be interpreted with the
Rational Premise.Traditionis Custode like Desiderio Desideravi, use the political Left, dishonest version of
the Council.
FAKE NEWS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II
For years Reuters, Associated Press,
Crux and other media have been churning out fake news on Vatican Council II.
Phillip Pullela and others have been interpreting the Council with an Irrational and not Rational Premise for political -left reasons.
Vatican Council II interpreted with a
Fake and not Rational Premise is part of a political agenda. Now even the
Catechism of the Catholic Church has to be re-interpreted rationally. Cardinal
Schonborn uses the Fake Premise is Austria.
The Novus Ordo Mass can also have the
ecclesiology of the 16th century, when the Council is
interpreted only with a Rational Premise. Then there is no development of
doctrine.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS HEADING TOWARDS TRADITION AND ITS CONSERVATIVE PAST
The Catholic Church is heading for
Tradition where it always was. With Vatican Council II interpreted with a
Rational Premise there is no other choice.
The conservatives all over the world need the Catholic Church, without its present liberalism and for this Vatican Council II must only be interpreted with a Rational Premise. This is also the honest thing to do.
But Pope John Paul II and Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre about Vatican Council
II (Rational). The Left wanted him excommunicated.
VICTOR ORBAN NEEDS TO HAVE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH CONSERVATIVE ONCE AGAIN IN HUNGARY AND EUROPE
Viktor Orban and conservatives need to explain
how Vatican Council II interpreted with an Irrational Premise and not the Rational Premise is unethical.It only supports the political Left. This Vatican Council II is interpreted dishonestly by Pope Francis and Nancy
Pelosi.
Laura Ingraham and Raymond Arroyo accept
Vatican Council II interpreted with a False Premise. This is politicized hate
being imposed upon Catholics by the Left which they overlook.
Over the years there have been shout out
calls saying Pope Benedict’s new theology is politicized and based upon a False
Premise creating a rupture between faith and reason.However at Crux and other lefitst media they have slept
through this.
THE COUNCIL-RATIONAL IS TRENDING
Yes the Council is trending. It is in
harmony with Feeneyite EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. So we can
quote the past Catechisms and the Syllabus of Errors, which are in harmony with
Vatican Council II (rational). Vatican Council II (irrational) is obsolete.The Council ( Rational) does not contradict the past faith and moral theology.
We can interpret Vatican Council II not like the political Left but the past Magisterium which only used the Rational Premise.
IT IS MODERNISM WHEN THE PRESENT TWO POPES USE A FALSE PREMISE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II
It is modernism when the present two
popes interpret the Council with the Irrational Premise to create a
break with Feeneyite EENS and the rest of Tradition. The Lefebvrists, Thucs and
conservatives make the same error.
Una Voce, Spain, offers the Latin Mass
with the New Ecclesiology created with the False Premise. The liberals attend
the Novus Ordo Mass with the same liberal theology of Pope Benedict. With the
Rational Premise the liberalism ends.
Pope Benedict’s theology is flawed since
it is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with an irrational and not
rational premise. He did not correct the mistake as the Prefect of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
BISHOP SCHNEIDER CORRECTS THE OFFICIAL MISTAKE IN POPE BENEDICT'S THEOLOGY
Pope Benedict’s theology based upon a
false premise, false inference and non-traditional conclusion has expired.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider corrects the official mistake.
There can be a common theology in the
Catholic Church which is conservative and not liberal. Now Vatican Council II
is liberal and irrational. It is political and not Catholic.
The Office of the President of the
French and Italian Bishops Conference are both political Left posts today. But
if Vatican Council II is interpreted with a Rational Premise by the both of them,
there is no break today, with 13th century Tradition.
Pope Benedict still has time to
interpret Vatican Council II, like Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor
Marshall, while he still lives.
The 50-year old habit of reading Vatican
Council II with an irrational and not rational premise has to be broken. Then
the Council will not have practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the
Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. There will be a
return to the past faith, morals and mission.
At Vatican Council II( 1965) Pope Paul
VI mistook invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and the
baptism of desire as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church and
so alleged ‘practical exceptions’ for EENS. The ‘Church’ made a mistake.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
