Monday, November 1, 2021

Alma Redemptoris Mater

If for you Vatican Council II has passages which support and contradict Feeneyite EENS then this could indicate that you are using the False Premise to interpret the Council-text

 

                                                                                                                                                                          -Lionel Andrades































Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?Vatican Council II.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )

Bishop Peter Libasci and Bishop Bernard Fellay choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise and remain politically correct with the Left and present a political version of the Council which is a break with Tradition.They create the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition since it is also approved by the Vatican.

 

For Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and Bishop Bernard Fellay, former Superior General, Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14)  are personally known and visible in the present times(2021) for them to be objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church, non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.So it is concluded by them that there are practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed.So traditional ecclesiocentrism has been made obsolete.

Holy Mass is offered in Latin at the SSPX chapel in Rome and Albano,by priests who do not accept the dogma EENS ( with no exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions for the past ecumenism of return) and the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions). It is the same at Holy Mass in English, in New Hampshire, in the Diocese of Manchester, USA.They interpret Magisterial Documents with the False Premise and so there are exceptions.

There are practical exceptions for them. so there is a new doctrine on salvation.It makes Traditional Mission and the Proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politcs obsolete. The New Theology based upon the objective error creates an opending for a New Ecumenism and New Evangelisation which is Christocentric and not Ecclesiocentric.There is a New Ecclesiology, even at Holy Mass in Latin,  which rejects the old theology.So there is no more an ecclesiocentric inter-religious dialogue and an exclusivist ecumenism.

Bishop Peter Libasci and Bishop Bernard Fellay choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise, remain politically correct with the Left and present a political version of the Council which is a break with Tradition.They create the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition since it is also approved by the Vatican.

If they choose the Rational Premise to interpret LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc then the Council would have the hermeneutic of continuity with Catholic Tradition, but this would not be approved by the Left.

So they have chosen a political interpretation of Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, EENS, Catechisms, Vatican Council II etc) which is heretical.It is schismatic with the past Magisterium.It is liberal and supports doctrinal division in the Catholic Church.

When interviewed by Dr. Taylor Marshall, Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14), Dr. Marshall confirmed that there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire. 

Feb 28, 2020
9 key moments in this video
From 06:36
Liturgical Argument
From 10:47
The First Commandment of God
From 14:53
Argument of the Baptism of Desire
From 21:32
The Importance of Communion on the Tongue and the Tabernacle Location
From 25:54
The Heavenly Liturgy
From 53:46
Are Freemasons Operating inside the Clergy and Even inside the Episcopal
From 01:11:04
When He Already Announced His Resignation He Said to the Cardinals You Will Elect a New Pope to Whom I Will Submit Myself and to Whom I Promise Obedience so How Can He Submit to Someone Who Is Not Pope It Is a It Is a Contradiction in and It Could So They Do Benedict a Schizophrenic Person if He Would Sink in this Way Then in the Last General Audience He Spoke Clearly Did I Did the Resignation with Full Conscience with Freedom and Knowing All the Consequences of this Act so these Are the Old Words and Then There Are Other the Other Two Proofs in a Letter Which He Wrote in 2014
From 01:26:33
The Bible Hadn't Been Canonized Yet He Didn't Always Have the Support of the Pope but He Knew He Was Rooted in the Tradition That Came before Him from the Apostles so that Same Ideas Now and It's Having a Liturgical Manifestation So Can You Speak to Your Own Devotion to the Traditional Latin Mass and the Traditional Seven Sacraments and the Traditional Bravery and Then if You Have Time I Love To Hear Your Thoughts on the Pre 1955 Holy Week Yes First as You Mentioned this Is a Sign of Hope in the Midst of Darkness these Increasing of the Traditional Masks They Are I Consider Them Small Lights in the Night
From 01:40:11
And this Will Come We Have To Believe because the Church Is in the Hands of God and Our Lady She Is the Mother of the Church and She Is Conquering the Devil All the Heresies and So Let Us Entrust to Her Powerful Hands Immaculate Heart these Our Crisis Pope Francis that He May Convert To Be a True Celes Vicar of Christ on Earth and So Let Us Be Good Missionaries and Continue with Conviction and with Joy Our Catholic Faith in Life because We Know Whom We Believed Oh Man We Should in There It's Beautiful You'Re Actually It's Absolutely Beautiful It's Encouraging and It's Joyful


Schneider and Marshall indicate that Libasci and Fellay are in mortal sins of faith with their first class heresy, in rejecting the Creeds etc, with the False Premise ( invisible  cases of the baptism of desire are visible in the present times), False Inference ( the baptism of desire etc are objective exceptions for the dogma EENS, Athanasius Creed,Syllabus of Errors etc) and Non Traditional Conclusion ( Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition(EENS etc).-Lionel Andrades

 





 
 
 
 
 MAY 12, 2019Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri calls heresy and mortal sins of faith magisterial https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/cardinal-lorenzo-baldiserri-calls.html
MAY 11, 2019For discerning Catholics this is all deception and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit the interpretation of the two popes is based upon a factual error. It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This cannot be the Magisterium   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/for-discerning-catholics-this-is-all.html

MAY 11, 2019
Image result for Roberto dei mattei photo 
 
Mortal sins of faith need to be confessed in the Sacrament of Reconciliaition like mortal sins of morals https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith-need-to-be.html
_________________________________________
I do not use an irrational inference, a false premise, so there is no discontinuity between Vatican II and Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/search/label/What%20I%20believe
The Magisterium made a mistake at Vatican Council II when it accomodated the Marchetti 1949 error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-magisterium-made-mistake-at-vatican.html
Vatican Council in general is being interpreted with an irrationality.Catholics do not know that there is a choice.Eliminate the premise and the Council dramatically changes http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/vatican-council-in-general-it-is-being.html
Priestly Fraternity of St.Peter (FSSP) has changed Church teachings on family catechesis, religious education, salvation, mortal sin, ecclesiology... http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/priestly-fraternity-of-stpeter-fssp-has.html 

The 'mainstream' Church has to begin the reconciliation process with doctrinal truth.They have to admit that there are no exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS, on March 19,2015http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-mainstream-church-has-to-begin.html 
If the Holy  See chooses to interpret Vatican Council without the false premise there can be a reconciliation.The announcement has first to be made by the Holy See. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-holy-see-chooses-to-interpret.html

MAY 30, 2019 
UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?
Image result for Graphics Vatican Council II  Feeneyite and Cushingite

If the Magisterium accepts that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without Marchetti's irrational premise and conclusion then the Church comes back to Tradition, as Bishop Williamson sought http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-magisterium-accepts-that-vatican.html
Image result for Graphics Vatican Council II  Feeneyite and Cushingite
 When the laity are aware of the false premise, they will not fall for this ruse  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/when-laity-are-aware-of-false-premise.html
Bishop Fellay uses a false premise when he assumes LG 8 refers to visible in the flesh cases : Doctrine has not changed unless you use a false premise http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/bishop-fellay-uses-false-premise-when.html