Monday, November 1, 2021
If for you Vatican Council II has passages which support and contradict Feeneyite EENS then this could indicate that you are using the False Premise to interpret the Council-text
-Lionel Andrades
Bishop Peter Libasci and Bishop Bernard Fellay choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise and remain politically correct with the Left and present a political version of the Council which is a break with Tradition.They create the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition since it is also approved by the Vatican.
For Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA and Bishop Bernard Fellay, former Superior General, Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) are personally known and visible in the present times(2021) for them to be objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church, non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.So it is concluded by them that there are practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed.So traditional ecclesiocentrism has been made obsolete.
Holy Mass is offered in Latin at the SSPX chapel in Rome and Albano,by priests who do not accept the dogma EENS ( with no exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors ( with no exceptions for the past ecumenism of return) and the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions). It is the same at Holy Mass in English, in New Hampshire, in the Diocese of Manchester, USA.They interpret Magisterial Documents with the False Premise and so there are exceptions.
There are practical exceptions for them. so there is a new doctrine on salvation.It makes Traditional Mission and the Proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politcs obsolete. The New Theology based upon the objective error creates an opending for a New Ecumenism and New Evangelisation which is Christocentric and not Ecclesiocentric.There is a New Ecclesiology, even at Holy Mass in Latin, which rejects the old theology.So there is no more an ecclesiocentric inter-religious dialogue and an exclusivist ecumenism.
Bishop Peter Libasci and Bishop Bernard
Fellay choose to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise, remain
politically correct with the Left and present a political version of the
Council which is a break with Tradition.They create the hermeneutic of rupture
with Tradition since it is also approved by the Vatican.
If they choose the Rational Premise to
interpret LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc then the Council would have
the hermeneutic of continuity with Catholic Tradition, but this would not be
approved by the Left.
So they have chosen a political
interpretation of Magisterial Documents ( Creeds, EENS, Catechisms, Vatican
Council II etc) which is heretical.It is schismatic with the past Magisterium.It is liberal and supports doctrinal division in the Catholic Church.
When interviewed by Dr. Taylor Marshall, Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14), Dr. Marshall confirmed that there are no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.
Schneider and Marshall indicate
that Libasci and Fellay are in mortal sins of faith with their first class
heresy, in rejecting the Creeds etc, with the False Premise ( invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible in
the present times), False Inference ( the baptism of desire etc are objective exceptions for the
dogma EENS, Athanasius Creed,Syllabus of Errors etc) and Non Traditional Conclusion ( Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition(EENS etc).-Lionel Andrades
MAY 12, 2019Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri calls heresy and mortal sins of faith magisterial https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/cardinal-lorenzo-baldiserri-calls.htmlMAY 11, 2019For discerning Catholics this is all deception and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit the interpretation of the two popes is based upon a factual error. It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This cannot be the Magisterium https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/for-discerning-catholics-this-is-all.html
MAY 11, 2019Mortal sins of faith need to be confessed in the Sacrament of Reconciliaition like mortal sins of morals https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith-need-to-be.html_________________________________________I do not use an irrational inference, a false premise, so there is no discontinuity between Vatican II and Traditionhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/search/label/What%20I%20believeThe Magisterium made a mistake at Vatican Council II when it accomodated the Marchetti 1949 error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-magisterium-made-mistake-at-vatican.htmlVatican Council in general is being interpreted with an irrationality.Catholics do not know that there is a choice.Eliminate the premise and the Council dramatically changes http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/vatican-council-in-general-it-is-being.htmlPriestly Fraternity of St.Peter (FSSP) has changed Church teachings on family catechesis, religious education, salvation, mortal sin, ecclesiology... http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/priestly-fraternity-of-stpeter-fssp-has.html How can everyone be wrong and only you be correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/how-can-everyone-be-wrong-and-only-you.htmlTwo standards on doctrine http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/two-standards-on-doctrine.html
The 'mainstream' Church has to begin the reconciliation process with doctrinal truth.They have to admit that there are no exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS, on March 19,2015http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-mainstream-church-has-to-begin.html If the Holy See chooses to interpret Vatican Council without the false premise there can be a reconciliation.The announcement has first to be made by the Holy See. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-holy-see-chooses-to-interpret.html
MAY 30, 2019 UR 3 does not contradict the passage from Mystici Corporis which you have quoted. Would you like to comment ? If UR 3 is not an exception to EENS then there is no Vatican Council II revolution in the text of the Council ?
If the Magisterium accepts that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without Marchetti's irrational premise and conclusion then the Church comes back to Tradition, as Bishop Williamson sought http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/if-magisterium-accepts-that-vatican.html When the laity are aware of the false premise, they will not fall for this ruse http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/when-laity-are-aware-of-false-premise.htmlBishop Fellay uses a false premise when he assumes LG 8 refers to visible in the flesh cases : Doctrine has not changed unless you use a false premise http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/bishop-fellay-uses-false-premise-when.html
The 'mainstream' Church has to begin the reconciliation process with doctrinal truth.They have to admit that there are no exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS, on March 19,2015http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-mainstream-church-has-to-begin.html