Friday, November 9, 2018

In general the SSPX interprets Magisterial documents as a rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors) unlike me and yet they keep saying that they follow Tradition : comunique false

Today, more than ever, the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X renews its attachment to the Church’s two thousand years of Tradition, convinced that this fidelity, far from being an outdated rigidness, provides the salutary remedy for the self-destruction of the Church.-Comunique of the General House of the SSPX on the Canonisation of Pope Paul VI
This is false.
'The Priestly Society of Saint Pius X renews its attachment to the Church's two thousand years of Tradition'.

The SSPX interprets the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) with what I call Cushingism, instead of Feeneyism.
They interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism. They reject the Council(Cushingite) but do not interpret it with Feeneyism.
I affirm BOD,BOB and I.I with Feeneyism. I also affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism. I follow Tradition.
The SSPX interprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism. I use traditional Feeneyite philosophy.For me EENS is Feeneyite .
So on the SSPX offical website BOD, BOB and I.I being explicit, become exceptions to the dogma EENS ( Feeneyite). For me BOD,BOB and I.I being implicit are not an exception or relevant to EENS ( Feeneyite).
Since BOD, BOB and I.I are implicit, as are LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) is not a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite) for me.The SSPX does not seem to have any concept of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
Since BOD, BOB and I.I refer to explicit non Catholics saved outside the Church, without the baptism of water, there are now two interpretations of the Nicene Creed.There's and mine. One is Cushingite and the other Feeneyite. For them it is ,'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water, they are the baptisms of desire,blood, invincible ignorance etc'.For me it is 'I believe in one(known) baptism for the forgiveness of sins'.
They interpret all the Catechisms with Cushingism and I do so with Feeneyism. So the Catechisms must be an exception to EENS ( Feeneyite) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology for them. Not for me.
So when the Catechism of Pope Pius X mentions invincible ignorance, for example,  the SSPX reads it with Cushingite lens. The Catechism of Pope Pius X would then contradict Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors( Feeneyite) and the past excluvist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
Since BOD, BOB and I.I and UR 3 refer to objective non Catholics saved outside the Church, Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with an ecumenism of return. Also BOD, BOB and I.I becomes a rupture with Feeneyite EENS on ecumenism.
In general the SSPX interprets Magisterial documents as a rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors) unlike me and yet they keep saying that they follow Tradition.






NOVEMBER 8, 2018

SSPX Rector at St. Thonas Aquinas seminary USA seems to agree that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, interpreted the Catechism of Pope Pius X as a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/in-general-sspx-interprets-magisterial.html


https://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/communiqu%C3%A9-general-house-sspx-canonisation-pope-paul-vi-41188





Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)