Friday, October 5, 2018

The 'facts' and 'rules' in the Catholic Church have changed (The Crossroads at 23rd Street )

from the website 


Faith

The Crossroads at 23rd Street



By What Authority Do The MHFM Preach

"But how are men to call upon Him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in Him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without a preacher?" - Romans 10:14
In order to properly receive and hear the word of God, so that man may believe, there is a condition associated with it. Man cannot "believe in Him" unless they have heard it, receiving the word from a messenger, a teacher, a preacher.
Lionel: Michael and Peter Dimond are the teachers, the preachers.
_____________________________
Does this verse imply that anyone claiming to be a “preacher” fulfills the requirement?
No, definitely not; as is revealed in 2 Corinthians 11:12-15;
Lionel: Only those Catholics who represent the Catholic Church can teach who are in harmony with the popes and saints of the past; the Magisterium of the past.They must also be  in harmony with a Magisterium of the present ( 2018) which is in harmony with the Magisterium of the past.They have the Truth and so the right to teach and preach it.
If the present magisterium is in a rupture with the past and is teaching errors, which cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit , then obviously this magisterium  should be rejected, until the time the ecclesiastics repent and rectify the scandal.Until then it is not a Magisterium since it does not teach according to the Holy Spirit but according to human error.
_________________________
2 Corinthians 11:12-15
  1. "But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we."
  2. "For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ."
  3. "And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light."
  4. "Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works."
Holy Scripture teaches us that it cannot be just any “preacher”, but only one “sent” by God. The very next verse (Romans 10:15) confirms this:
>And how can men preach unless they are sent?
Sent? If someone has been “sent”, then logic dictates that "someone else” had to order the sending. And if someone ordered the sending, then the word “sent”, in this context, most assuredly implies someone with “authority”.
Thus the next logical question beomes … “sent by whom?”
The Greek word for "sent", as used in the book of Romans was written “apostello”; which means “to send out properly on a mission”. The word denotes a commission and authorization that is limited in time and is concerned only with the business at hand, not with the status of a person discharging it.
From “apostello” we get the Greek word "apostolos”, which means "he who is sent" and is used in the Bible as the word "Apostle".
So, who are the "they" who are sent, and by whom are "they" sent? It is no coincidence that the same same Greek word, "apostello", is used by Jesus Christ when He addressed His "Apostolos" in John 20:21;
"Jesus said to them again, 'Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I send you'."
It should now be clear that those who were sent out (apostello) by God to preach (teach) were given a commission and the authority to do so by Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God. Their teaching “authority” was bestowed upon them, directly, by Jesus Christ:
"And He appointed twelve, to be with Him, and to be sent out to preach..." - Mark 3:14
 Mark 3:14
Thus, those who are sent, are sent with the full authority given to them by God. It should be evident, to all, that the only persons authorized to preach, at that time, were the Apostles, and afterwards that “authority” was passed on to those who followed these disciples of God, through a long line of legitimate succession.
Saint Paul said in 2 Corinthians 10:8;
"So, if I brag a little too much about the authority which the Lord gave us, I'm not ashamed. The Lord gave us this authority to help you, not to hurt you."
The Most Holy Family Monastery (MHFM) in Fillmore, New York, under its controversial “Superior”, Frederick “Michael” Dimond, have yet to present any evidence indicating that they have been legitimately “sent” out to “preach”.
Lionel: They affirm the past Magisterium of the Church. This is expressed in the citings on their website. The dogmas and doctrines of the Church do not change. Jesus is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.
The ecclesiastics in Rome and the websites The Crossroads have to affirm the Catholic Faith in harmony with the past. They must also express what they believe in public as the MHFM have done.
____________________________
 Where is their proof of apostolic succession (i.e. ordination); by which is the ONLY legitimate way of acquiring the right to claim and act as a part of the “teaching authority”?
Lionel : They do not claim apostolic succession since the present Benedictines have rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, interpret the baptism of desire with an irrationality, interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality, they have rejected the Catechism of the Pope Pius X, rejected the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return and yet claim apostolic succession, with doctrine and theology.
______________________________________
I ask you to ask yourselves ... by what authority do “the Dimond Brothers” of the MHFM preach? Who "sent" them?
Lionel: They are sent by the authority of Jesus and the Catholic Church, the true Catholic Church and not the false one within it, whose dogmas, doctrines and theology on exclusive salvation, do not change .
___________________________
The MHFM’s audacious and erroneous claim that “God told / instructed” Joseph Natale (the founder of their “self-identified” Order of Saint Benedict) to start their not-for-profit corporation can ONLY be considered, at the very most, a “private revelation”. And a “private revelation” is NOT a “public revelation”; and thus why would anyone, in their right mind, take such nonsense as “proof” and “believe” such a non-Catholic claim? History itself is filled to overflowing with the false claims of heretics, apostates, and theological reprobates who have conspired with the “Father of Lies” to find palpable “justification” to ensnare the unsuspecting; and profit from off their vainglorious works.
We must all remember ... God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. 
Lionel: Yes and there are the citations of many popes over the centuries on outside the Church there is no salvation based on John 3:5, Mark 16:16, Matt.7:13, John 6 etc, where is it on your Crossroads website ?
________________________

Today, as in the past, He does not speak to His flock through those NOT in “authority", those who have NOT received the fullness of truth, those who have NOT received "Holy Orders" (i.e. legitimately ordained into the priesthood). Those are the "facts", the “rules” and they have not and will not ever change.
Lionel: The 'facts' and 'rules' have changed and you are part of that change.
The Vatican has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Fact 1.
The Vatican (CDF) interprets the baptism of desire as referring to known people in the present times saved outside the Church.You do the same. This is irrational. Fact 2.
Fact 3.....I could go on.
So the rules have changed.Pope Benedict confirmed all this in March 2016 (Avvenire) and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj did the same on March 1, 2018 at the Placuet Deo Press Conference.
___________________________

Of course, and in all fairness, the MHFM is NOT the only “breakaway” traditional Catholic sect, who has been successful in drawing away vast numbers of the “faithful” from receiving proper and legitimate “pastoral care” (i.e. the Sacraments and proper / full ecclesiastic instruction). These miscreants do not appear to be concerned with Christ’s promise, His warning, to those who harm his flock:
Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were hung round his neck and he were thrown into the sea.” - Mark 9:42
Lionel: Apply this teaching to your self since you cannot deny what I have written in these blog posts.
___________________________
The Dimond Brothers were NOT “sent” … they simply “went”. It's still not too late to repent, Brother Michael.
Lionel : Says an anonymous writer posing as a good Catholic and who will not affirm Vatican Council II, EENS and the past ecclesiology without an irrational premise.
-Lionel Andrades
___________________________
http://www.23rdstreet.com/mhfm/by_what_authority.aspx





Repost : Focolares, Neo Cathechumenal Way,Charismatic Renewal ask the CDF (Graphics)

SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

Focolares, Neo Cathechumenal Way,Charismatic Renewal ask the CDF (Graphics)






-Lionel Andrades


SEPTEMBER 26, 2018


Ask the CDF (Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/ask-cdf-graphics.html




SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

Cardinal Marx will not be able to lie before the German judiciary ( Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/image-result-for-graphics-vatican.html



SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

CDF and Bishops' Conferences need to interpret magisterial documents rationally (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/cdf-and-bishops-conferences-need-to.html



SEPTEMBER 26, 2018


Magisterium violates the Principle of Non Contradiction and does not issue a correction (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/magisterium-violates-principle-of-non.html


SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

GERMAN TROUBLE (Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/german-trouble-graphics.html

________________________________________

The official Benedictines reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and interpret the baptism of desire etc as referring to known people saved outside the Church.Canonically they should be checked.However for political reasons, they are supported by the Left and the Vatican.

From the website The Crossroads at 23rd Street

Faith & Forgiveness

Disclaimer: Please, Don't Confuse the Issue.

There appears to be some confusion for those of you who have written to me staunchly, adamantly, and often times rudely defending the work of the Most Holy Family Monastery (MhFM) rather than first and foremost providing me with the proof that this New York domestic not-for-profit corporation is, in fact, a legitimate Catholic Benedictine religious community with the required "canonical provison"; and that Frederick Dimond (a.k.a. Brother Michael) met all the pre-conditions and requirements stipulated under Canon Law to be elected to the position of Superior overseeing the purportred monastery in Fillmore, NY.
Lionel : The official Benedictines reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and interpret the baptism of desire etc as referring to known people saved outside the Church.Canonically they should be checked.However for political reasons, they are supported by the Left and the Vatican.
Do not expect  Michael and Peter Dimond to reject the Catholic Faith and seek the approval of the Benedictines or chose to join them.
__________________________
I solemnly swear, that when any such quantifiable, viable, and canonically sound proof is submitted to me that I will immediately remove the related content from off this website and "repent" for any unfounded harm I have caused the innocent.
Lionel: 
1.The proof is that in none of your videos do you affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16thh century and the popes and saints of the past.It's on this one point that you and the Benedictines are disqualified.
2.Please also issue a disclaimer clarifying that you do not know of any one saved with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance in  2018, with or without the baptism of water.Also that you do not know of a St. Emerentiana or Emperor Valentinian saved outside the Church this year or during the time of your life.
3.Please also let us know if you are aware of the difference between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Vatican Council II Feeneyite, Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise and Vatican Council II interpreted without the false invisible non Catholics saved outside the Church are physically visible premise.

Can you solemnly swear that what I have written above is not true?
_____________________________
For the record, let me state, that it is not the MhFM's message being promoted via their Website, Books, DVDs, YouTube Channel that is the focus of this website.
The Dimond Brothers position on Church doctrine, dogma, sedevacantism, and Vatican II's tragic break from "tradition" is not actually being debated within the webpages found here at the Crossroads at 23rd Street. The MhFM is entitled to express their opinion.
"Everyone has the right to their own opinions but no one has the right to their own facts."
Lionel: They affirm the dogma EENS, which is not their personal opinion. It is the teaching of the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).You reject it.There is not a single video in which you affirm it.Instead you criticize others on this point.
Since Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is an obvious rupture with Tradition,the  MHFM and other Catholics refused to accept Rome and the religious communities when they teach error and do not deny it.
_________________________________

The point being raised on this website is that, since 1996, the pious fraud being deceitfully orchestrated against disgruntled Catholics by the Dimond Brothers is reprehensible, scandalous and must end!
Lionel: Why do you call it a fraud if you are a Catholic ? The official Benedictines like the Vatican do not affirm the dogma EENS.They also interpret the baptism of desire etc with an irrationality(invisible people are visible) to create a rupture with EENS and the rest of Tradtion.
When Rome and your website issues a clarification and affirms the past ecclesiology in harmony with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), then you can expect the traditionalists to be reconciled with the rest of the now liberal Catholic Church, of which you are a propagandist.
_______________________________
It is out of charity that I ask these two "delusional brothers", Frederick (a.k.a. Brother Michael) and Peter (a.k.a. Brother Peter), to cease and desist from playing religious "make-believe" games and deceiving the public. These "brothers" are Sarabaite and not Benedictine monks who are running a "business of religion" and not a Catholic monastery. They are Religious Carpetbaggers who "prey on" and do not "pray for" the salvation of the Christian Fathful.
Lionel: Without responding to the comments on this blog this unknown person, who writes anonymously and is funded by anonymous people is maligning Michael and Peter Dimond.
_______________________________________________
-Lionel Andrades
"If anyone says that ... those who have been neither rightly ordained nor sent by ecclesiastical and canonical authority, but come from a different source, are lawful ministers of the word …: let him be anathema [cf. n. 960]." - Denzinger: Sources of Catholic Dogma: 967 Can. 7
Pax Tecum

http://www.23rdstreet.com/disclaimer.aspx