Those who practise yoga, Transcendental Meditation and other Eastern mental techniques and draw from the New Age must also learn personal Deliverance ; Deliverance Prayers. - Lionel Andrades
Thursday, February 25, 2021
The truth which John Henry Weston and Life Site News hide
John Henry Weston and Life Site News correspondents do not telling the truth about Vatican Council II. They hide information on the Council interpreted without the false premise. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Roberto dei Mattei, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Romano Amerio and many others cited on Life Site News made a mistake on Vatican Council II . They knew Vatican Council II was a break with Tradition, it had a New Theology, but they did not know the precise cause.
1.So they would interpret Vatican Council II with the New Theology and also criticize the New Theology.
2.They could not interpret Vatican Council II without the common false premise of the popes.
The precise cause of the break with Tradition was the false premise.Without the false premise the Council affirms the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus in Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and without the false premise , LG 8, LG 14, LG 6, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are not objective exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 or EENS.
This is the truth which John Henry Weston and Life Site News hides. -Lionel Andrades
John Henry Weston interviewing those who interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition, in particular 16th century EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
During their Rome trip they were not interested in the truth about Vatican Council II and how it can be interpreted with or without a false premise and the conclusion is non traditional or traditional.
___________
Life Site News supports the teaching of the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the Baltimore Catechism, with a false premise.
________________________
Life Site News and the Lefebvrists support the Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma by Ludwig Ott and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( see photo below).Both these books affirm the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO).
LOHO interpres the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with a false premise.
So a New Theology was created.
The past theology said outside the Church there is no salvation and the present one says there is salvation.
LOHO confused invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance etc, which could only be known to God, as being practical exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology.
They were seen as objective exceptions to the past teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
So with the confusion,
hypothetical ( LG 8 etc) cases were projected as as being objective. So a new theology was born.
By ignoring the New Theology and avoiding the false premise Life Site News could go back to the old theology of the Church.But it would not be Lefebvrist but Feeneyite.
___________________________
Now even the old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally. Where ever the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and the baptism of blood are mentioned, they are interpreted with the false premise. So they become practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional ecumenism of return.
The Syllabus of Errors is ma
de obsolete.
The liberals, Lefebvrists and Life Site News, make the same mistake.
This is official modernism. It makes the Oath Against Modernism, the Profession of Faith and Oath of the Bishop obsolete.
The heresy,schism and irrationality is the norm in the Catholic Church today.
There is no acknowledgement of the error or its correction.A recent report on Life Site News suggested going back to the old theological manuals. But how will you interpret them ? With or without the false premise ?
_________________________________________
There can be various methods to present the Catechism but the present doctrine and theology is wrong. It is a rupture with traditional Catechism.
The false premise is used to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. So the understanding is changed of Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms and the Creeds.
So now there can be new presentations but it is not the Deposit of the Faith. This error is not corrected on Life Site News especially,in the reports of Peter Kwasniewski.
___________
____________________________
The Old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally like the Catechism of the Catholic Church.So Fr. John Hardon is cited on Life Site News but it is not mentioned that he interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally like the liberals.
________
The Traditional Catechisms on the website Whispers of Restoration are interpreted with the false premise.
The website was supported by Peter Kwasniewski a correspondent of Life Site News.
______________
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/06/what-good-is-changing-catechism.html
Peter Kwasniewski interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church with the common irrationality. So there is 'a new revelation' in the Church for them at Life Sites.It contradicts the Bible and the old revelation of the Catholic Church.
Unknown and theoretical cases are presented as objective exceptions to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.
So Life Site News supports a development of doctrine based upon the false premise.They are liberals on this issue.
Kwasniewshi refuses to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus like St. Thomas Aquinas.
He also interprets Vatican Council II with the objective mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which contradicted EENS according to Aquinas.
.
Kwasniewski and Life Site News will criticize the New Theology and also use it to interpret Magisterial documents.
_____________
The Catechism of the Council of Trent refers to 'the desire thereof' which refers to an invisible case in 2021.It is always an invisible case.
It is always hypothetical.
If it exists it can only be known to God.
Yet the traditionalists interpret the Catechism of the Council of Trent (baptism of desire) as contradicting Feeneyite EENS.
This is irrational. With this error the New Theology is created.This is the theology of Life Site News.
_____________
The blurb is false. Since it depends upon how you interpret this Catechism.
Do you use a false premise or do you avoid it? Are you a Cushingite or Feeneyite? This is unknown to the correspondents of Life Site News.
Making this distinction before the interpretation, determines the conclusion.
It is the same with Vatican Council II.But this point is never mentioned on Life Site News. They simply refer to Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church as if there is only one interpretation.-Lionel Andrades
The Catholic News Agency could correct the error in their report when they projected unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance (LG 16) as being practical and objective exceptions to 16th century EENS, as held by the St. Benedict Center, NH, USA
The Catholic News Agency could correct the error in their report when they projected unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance (LG 16) as being practical and objective exceptions to 16th century EENS, as held by the St. Benedict Center, NH, USA. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 24, 2021
For the Catholic News Agency what does not exist really exists and what is not seen is really seen and who is not really there is really there. This is their reality
The Catholic News Agency report indicates that all the past agreements between the St. Benedict Center, NH and the Diocese of Manchester, USA are null and void since the SBC will not consider unknown, speculative, theoretical and hypothetical cases of being saved in invincible ignorance (CCC 847-848) as being practical, objective and seen in the flesh exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS.
For the Catholic News Agency what does not exist really exists and what is not seen is really seen and who is not really there is really there. This is their reality. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 23, 2021
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider have not commented on the Catholic News Agency report and the CDF error : they are protecting their personal interests
Vatican upholds prohibitions placed on Feeneyite group by diocese in New Hampshire
.- The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has declined to consider an appeal by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary located in New Hampshire against prohibitions placed on them by the Diocese of Manchester.
The group, located in Richmond, N.H., about 60 miles southwest of Manchester, has roots in an order originally founded by Fr. Leonard Feeney.
The Diocese of Manchester had placed the group under precepts of prohibition, effective Jan. 7, 2019, because of obstinacy in their theological position regarding the principle that there is no salvation outside the Church. They were prohibited from referring to themselves as an association of the faithful in the Church and having sacraments celebrated at their property, among other things.
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart appealed the prohibitions to the CDF, but “Rome chose not to consider the appeal,” Fr. Georges de Laire, judicial vicar of the Diocese of Manchester, said, according to the New Hampshire Union Leader.
“The decision from CDF says that it was rejected because it fell outside the statute of limitations,” Fr. de Laire said.
He told the Union Leader that the diocese is “now engaged in an effort to dialogue” with the group and to encourage them to observe the prohibitions, and that the diocese has a “complicated relationship” with the Slaves.
Bishop Peter Libasci of Manchester “remains hopeful that a solution can be identified,” Fr. de Laire said. “The bishop is committed to the Slaves and their supporters, as they are members of the Church and he owes them ministry.”
That membership in the Church is necessary for all men for salvation is a truth of revelation; however, actual membership can, in special circumstances, be replaced by a desire, even implicit, for this membership.
(Lionel: Yes hypothetically, speculatively and this is not a practical exception to the dogma EENS).
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Richmond are not affiliated in any way with the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary located in Still River, Mass. That community, also rooted in an order first founded by Fr. Feeney, was refounded in 1976, and was regularized by the Bishop of Worcester in 2002.
In October 2016 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith wrote to Brother Andre Marie, leader of the group based in Richmond, that the position he retains - that articles from the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Dominus Iesus on the principle ‘outside the Church there is no salvation’ have been given different readings that are contrary to one another, and it is permissible to hold the position that these articles contradict previous Church teaching - is unacceptable.
(Lionel: The CDF interpretation of EENS with the false premise contradicts the past Magisterium of the Church. It contradicts EENS for example according to the missionaries in the 15th century.)
On that basis, and that the Slaves had persisted in their obstinacy and that scandal had continued, the Manchester diocese placed the prohibitions on the group which were to take effect in January 2019. The decree of prohibitions bears the signatures of Fr. de Laire and of Diane Quinlan, the diocesan chancellor.
The decree stated that only the Anointing of the Sick for a person in danger of physical death by an approved priest would be allowed at the group’s property, and that no priest would validly hear Confession and impart Absolution at the property except for a penitent in imminent danger of physical death.
It added that documents signed by the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart in April and July 2009, after which the then-bishop had provided for a priest to say Mass at their property, were null and void.
(Lionel: They affirmed the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. The CDF and the Diocese of Manchester officials cannot affirm the Athanasius Creed since there are alleged practical exceptions to EENS).
______________________
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider have not commented on the Catholic News Agency report.
Hypothetically Brother Andre Marie does not reject invincible ignorance but the CNA report suggests that being saved in invincible ignorance is not only a hypothetical case but is actually an objective exception to EENS. Being saved in invincible ignorance is objective for the CNA otherwise how could it be an exception to Feeneyite EENS.
This is irrational and deceptive and it is the official policy of Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the CDF.It is supported by Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider to protect their personal interests..-Lionel Andrades
https://catholicism.org/doctrinal-belief.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/brother-andre-marie-micm-cou
___________________________________
FEBRUARY 12, 2021
The Catholic New Agency(CNA) report calumniates the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, when CNA interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II with a false premise and expects the SBC to do the same. It's as if the SBC deserves to be punished with the Decree, for not being deceptive, like the diocesehttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search?q=Catholic+News+Agency
FEBRUARY 6, 2021
Catholic News Agency report on St. Benedict Center confusing
DECEMBER 7, 2020
The Catholic News Agency(Deutsch) unethically interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the three Church Councils which defined it.There is a German organisation which monitors unethical reporting in the media which must review the CNA reports in Germanyhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/catholic-news-agencydeutsch-unethically.html
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/
Pope Francis cannot be a pope and interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise. This is not Catholic. He should set a good example for all of us. Now he is unethical and dishonest for many who are aware of the scandal
Pope Francis cannot be a pope and interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise. This is not Catholic. He should set a good example for all of us. Now he is unethical and dishonest for many who are aware of the scandal. He would be heretical according to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.He is also in schism with the past Magisterium over the centuries, on EENS, the Creeds, Catechisms etc. - Lionel Andrades
The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi studied under the Jesuits who taught him to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis. He can correct the error and ask the Vatican to do the same
The new Italian Prime Minister Mario Dragi studied under the Jesuits who taught him to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis. He can correct the error and ask the Vatican to do the same. - Lionel Andrades
The Catholic judges of the U.S and Italian Supreme Courts are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and this has the approval of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict. There is no comment from Cardinal Raymond Burke, the former Prefect of the Vatican Tribunal ( Signatura ) , who makes the same error
The Catholic judges of the U.S and Italian Supreme Courts are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and this has the approval of Pope Francis and Pope Benedict. There is no comment from Cardinal Raymond Burke, the former Prefect of the Vatican Tribunal ( Signatura ) , who makes the same error. - Lionel Andrades
The Friends of St. Benedict Center, NH could ask Pope Francis and Cardinal Luia Ladaria sj, not to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and instead to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like Brother Andre Marie micm, and the St. Benedict Center, NH, in the Diocese of Manchester
The Friends of St. Benedict Center, NH could ask Pope Francis and Cardinal Luia Ladaria sj, not to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and instead to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like Brother Andre Marie micm, and the St. Benedict Center, NH, in the Diocese of Manchester.- Lionel Andrades
Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a non traditional, schismatic and heretical conclusion which is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA. Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Lefebvrists do the same
Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a non traditional, schismatic and heretical conclusion which is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA. Cardinal Raymond Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Lefebvrists do the same.They do not tell Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality and affirm Tradition and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and so remove the Decree of Precepts and Prohibitions placed upon the St. Benedict Center, NH. - Lionel Andrades
There is no denial from the Vatican Press Office. Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise. This is a scandal
There is no denial from the Vatican Press Office. Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise. This is a scandal.It is not Catholic. It is dishonest. If he did not confuse what is invisible as being visible, implicit as explicit and subjective as objective, he would emerge a rad trad. -Lionel Andrades
They teach Catechism with a false premise to avoid Catholic Tradition according to the past Catechisms
They teach Catechism with a false premise to avoid Catholic Tradition. Mary Jane Silvia, Director of Adult Faith Formation, Mary Ellen Mahon, Cabinet Secretary for Catholic Formation & Director of Pastoral Ministry and Kelly Goudreau Director of Parish Faith Formation and Youth Ministry in the Diocese of Manchester, USA, interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition and in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it is interpreted by the St. Benedict Center, N.H in the diocese. They officially teach this error to children, youth and adults in the diocese. There is no denial from them. -Lionel Andrades
The the writers of Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma and the Catechism of the Catholic Church( see photo below) affirm the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which interpreted the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance with a false premise. So a New Theology was created. The past theology said outside the Church there is no salvation and the present one says there is. How come?! Since invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance etc, which could only be known to God, were projected as practical exceptions to the past exclusivist ecclesiology. They were seen as exceptions to the past teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
___________________________
Now even the old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally. Where ever the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and the baptism of blood are mentioned, they are interpreted with the false premise. So they become practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional ecumenism of return.The Syllabus of Errors is made obsolete. The liberals and Lefebvrists make the same mistake. This is the error also in the Diocese of Manchester,USA when they teach Catechism. This is official modernism. It makes the Oath Against Modernism, the Profession of Faith and Oath of the Bishop obsolete.The heresy,schism and irrationality is the norm in the Catholic Church today.
_________________________________________
There can be various methods to present the Catechism but the doctrine and theology is wrong, it is a rupture with traditional Catechism. The false premise is used to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. So the meaning is changed of Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms and the Creeds. So there can be new presentations of innovation and dissent mistaken as the Deposit of the Faith.
___________
____________________________
The Old Catechisms are interpreted irrationally like the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
The Traditional Catechisms on the website Whispers of Restoration are interpreted with the false premise.It is the same error made in the teaching of Catechism in the liberal Diocese of Manchester, USA by the teachers in the photos above.
______________
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/06/what-good-is-changing-catechism.html
Peter Kwasniewski interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church with the same error as the Catechism teachers at Manchester. So there is 'a new revelation' in the Church for all of them. Kwasniewshi refuses to affirm the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus like St. Thoma Aquinas.He interprets Vatican Council II with the objective mistake of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. So he will criticize the New Theology and also use it to interpret Magisterial documents.
_____________
The Catechism of the Council of Trent refers to 'the desire thereof' which refers to an invisible case in 2021.It is always hypothetical.If it exists can only be known to God. Yet the traditionalists interpret the Catechism of the Council of Trent (baptism of desire) as contradicting Feeneyite EENS. This is irrational. With this error the New Theology is created.
_____________
The blurb is false. Since it depends upon how you interpret this Catechism that you get your result- traditional or non traditional. Do you use a false premise or do you avoid it? Are you a Cushingite or Feeneyite ?This determinses the conclusion. It is the same with Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
