Saturday, March 2, 2019

No denial from the SSPX - heresy and sacrilege

The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) bishops and priests support heresy and sacrilege.This is a scandal.They do not deny it. Their priority, like the liberals,is to be politically correct with the Left.The issue is no more Vatican Council II.Since now we know that it does not contradict Tradition.
Even after being informed they do not want to hold the traditional Feeneyite philosophy and theology.For then they would officially have to affirm 1)the past exclusive ecclesiology,2) extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century,3) an ecumenism of return and 4) the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Feeneyite EENS.
Intervista con don Davide Pagliarani
 CUSHINGISM CAUSES A HERMENEUTIC OF RUPTURE WITH TRADITION
Now they deny these four points below with their Cushingite philosophy and theology.So there is a rupture with Tradition which makes them politically correct with the enemies of the Catholic Church.
No magisterial text, including the Catechism of the Catholic Church(CCC) contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS( the red passages are not exceptions to the blue).1 The SSPX will not affirm or deny this. Either way there is trouble for them.
Like the present day ecclesiastics at the Vatican, who are not always magisterial(since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake) the SSPX officially deny the traditional teaching of the Church on exclusive salvation  with no known exceptions.
Over the last 50 years the SSPX has been saying everyone needs to enter the Church but some or many do not.So they speak in two ways. They run with the traditional hares and hunt with the liberal hounds.

 AVOIDING FEENEYISM
They do not want to officially hold the Feeneyite position on Vatican Council II but make excuses - as if this is a doctrinal option.
1.They say 'the Church' condemned Fr. Leonard Feeney's traditional interpretation of EENS.But 'the Church' also affirms Vatican Council II(Cushingite) which the SSPX rejects.So this could not be the real reason for them. Also if a pope or cardinal says invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to EENS he contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction.
2.They may say that Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney ,who said there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire etc.But now even the SSPX priests in Rome say there are no literal cases of BOD,BOB and I.I.This is something obvious.

 IT IS OBVIOUS
This is something obvious for even  the SSPX Prior at Albano, Italy. I spoke with him at the SSPX chapel in Rome.
The SSPX are in a scandal on the Creeds( Nicene, Athanasius, Apostles), the dogma EENS, the Catechisms and Vatican Council II.Since they will not confirm the obvious.They simply have to announce that literally there are no physically visible or personally known cases in 2019 of non Catholics saved outside the Church, with BOD, BOB or I.I.
They will not do this.

 SSPX CHANGES THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE CREED
Since it then means that Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvre were wrong and Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center were correct all along.The SSPX made a mistake on Vatican Council II over the last 50 years.
But when the SSPX changes the understanding of the Creed, it is a scandal.This cannot be ignored.
When the old Catechisms contradict each other- and also the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX - because of a conscious use of an irrationality,it is a scandal.
They could tell me that LG 8,LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc contradict the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church and I would say,"No.They do not contradict EENS and the past ecclesiology.Since they are subjective cases for me but objective for you.Invisible for me but visible for you.Hypothetical and theoretical for me but objective and personally known for you."
They could tell me that the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts itself for them and I would say - not for me.
Similarly the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) would contradict itself for them - but not for me.
So when I say that BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  refer to only hypothetical and known cases for me, am I correct or wrong? They have no official statement.

 WITH LEFTIST THEOLOGY BISHOP FELLAY WAS CALLING FOR DOCTRINAL TALKS
The SSPX General Chapter Statement on Doctrine(2012) affirmed Feeneyite theology but for Bishop Bernard Fellay, former Superior General of the SSPX, there was only Cushingite theology on EENS and Vatican Council II.With leftist theology he was calling for doctrinal talks.
Even for the Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF),Archbishops Morandi and Di Noia there is only Cushingite theology. Only Cushingite theology on EENS and Vatican Council II,is permitted  for Archbishop Guido Pozzo, Secretary of Ecclesia Dei, Vatican.
Yet the CDF and the SSPX cannot agree on Vatican Council II.
Since the SSPX rejects the conclusion of a Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Though the CDF and the SSPX accept the Cushingite interpretation of EENS.
Both however will not affirm a Feeneyite interpretation of Vatican Council II since it will be rejected by the political Left.

 NO DENIAL FROM THE SSPX ON SIX POINTS
The SSPX bishops and Superior General do not deny the following.
1. The SSPX bishops and priests change the meaning of the Creeds with visible- for- them BOD, BOB and I.I.
2.They change the meaning of the Catechisms with visible and personally known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I.
3.They interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with visible- for- them examples of salvation outside the Church, in BOD, BOB, I.I and LG 8, LG 16 etc.
4.They interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church as a rupture with the past ecclesiology when they use the same irrational premise( invisible and unknown people are known and visible on earth).
5.This is all heresy and they offer Holy Mass sacrilegiously in this condition.There is no denial from them.This is the acceptable liturgy for them.Since they do not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II and so contradict Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
6.They criticize the Novus Ordo Mass  at which the priest affirms the new ecclesiology and new theology, just like the SSPX, bishops and priests do, during Holy Mass in Latin.
The SSPX bishops and priests do not deny these six points.I have mentioned them before on this blog and e-mailed them.

SSPX COULD CLARIFY
1. They could say that Lionel Andrades is wrong on Point N.1 and that they do not interpret the Creeds with visible -for- them and personally known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.Since BOD, BOB and I.I always refer to hypothetical cases.They are not objective people in the present times.
2.They could say that they affirm the Catechisms with Feeneyism instead of Cushingisn.2
3.They could acknowledge that in their interpretation of EENS and Vatican Council II they do not mix up hypothetical cases as being non hypothetical. So BOD,BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc would always refer to unknown people, theoretical cases,  in the present times.
4.They could announce that they affirm the past exclusive ecclesiology, EENS according to the 16th century Magisterium, an ecumenism of return and based on EENS, the Social Reign of Christ the King.Since there are no exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc - they do not have to reject Vatican Council II.
5.They could clarify their theological and doctrinal position on the four points above.So they could clarify that they are not in a public mortal sin of faith. There is no scandal. The Holy Mass they offer is not a sacrilege.
6.They could clarify that the new  ecclesiology of the Novus Mass is not the same as the Tridentine Rite Mass,which  they offer.Their ecclesiology is no more based on visible BOD, BOB and I.I which are now assumed to be examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.

MEDIA RESPONSE
If the newspapers ask the SSPX about these six points how would they respond? Would they say that they are in heresy and scandal ? Or would they say that they affirm EENS, with BOD, BOB and I.I not being practically known, nor exceptions to EENS ?
Would they say that they affirm Vatican Council II with LG 8 etc not being exceptions to EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return? So Vatican Council II is no more a rupture with Tradition?
Would they affirm in public the Social Reign of Christ the King, since the priority is that all need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7), and there are no  practical exceptions to EENS, mentioned in Vatican Council II ?.
Would they also affirm an ecumenism of return according to Vatican Council II and post Vatican Council II magisterial documents, since there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to EENS?
-Lionel Andrades


1


    2





_______________________________


MARCH 1, 2019


With worldly prudence SSPX bishops and priests do not deny that they are in heresy in sacrilege: since the alternative is being Feeneyite and politically incorrect with the Left

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/with-worldly-prudence-sspx-bishops-and.html


FEBRUARY 28, 2019

Image result for Photo Society of St. Pius X doctrinal talks

Bishops and priests of the SSPX picture being saved in invincible ignorance, as referring to physically visible and personally known people : so the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) becomes a rupture with Tradition for them

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/bishops-and-priests-of-sspx-picture.html


MARCH 1, 2019

Con prudenza mondana, vescovi e sacerdoti della SSPX non negano di essere in eresia e in sacrilegio: poiché l'alternativa è essere Feeneyite e politicamente scorretta con la sinistra
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/con-prudenza-mondana-vescovi-e.html
________________________________________

MARCH 1, 2019

Michael Matt needs to change and not Brother Andre Marie MICM : Remnant News is as obsolete as CDF's Morandi and Di Noia

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/michael-matt-needs-to-change-and-not.html



MARCH 1, 2019


Catechism of the Catholic Church supports Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS: Magisterial texts including Vatican Council II say there are only Catholics in Heaven

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/catechism-of-catholic-church-supports.html


FEBRUARY 28, 2019

Image result for Photos catechism of the catholic church

Catechism of the Catholic Church supports Fr. Leonard Feeney

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/catechism-of-catholic-church-supports.html

 FEBRUARY 28, 2019



No Magisterial document contradicts Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/no-magisterial-document-contradicts_28.html




FEBRUARY 28, 2019

Image result for Photos St.Benedict Center N.H


CDF testing everybody's intelligence

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/cdf-testing-everybodys-intelligence.html

FEBRUARY 27, 2019



Is not a Lefbvrist traditionalist a heretic ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/is-not-lefbvrist-traditionalist-heretic.html

FEBRUARY 26, 2019

Father Davide Pagliarani supports an ecumenical Christ and a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism and Salvation : SSPX communique
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/father-davide-pagliarani-supports-and.html

FEBRUARY 24, 2019

The Catholic Church does say today that a person is in Hell and that there are many people there. Most people go to Hell and we can name them specifically
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-catholic-church-does-say-today-that.html

 FEBRUARY 19, 2019


Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents do not contradict Tradition, as most people wrongly believe

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/vatican-council-ii-and-other.html









Posted by at No comments:
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)