Fr. Gerald Murray & Diane Montagna interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational Premise like their host Matt Fradd

NOVEMBER 28, 2020

We know that Matt Fradd only interviews Cushingites to meet the agenda of his sponsors and to keep the Youtube numbers rising.If he would interview Brother Andre Marie MICM, many of Fradd's misconceptions would be shelved.The tone and content of his interviews would have to be altered.Matt Fradd would not be able to cite Lumen Gentium 16 as an exception to Feeneyite EENS.Brother Andre Marie would point out that LG 16 is a speculative case.So how could it be a practical exception to EENS ?

 We know that Matt Fradd only interviews Cushingites  to meet the agenda of his sponsors and to keep the Youtube numbers rising.If he would interview Brother Andre Marie MICM,  many of Fradd's misconceptions would be shelved.The tone and content of his interviews would have to be altered.

Matt Fradd would not be able to cite Lumen Gentium 16 as an exception to Feeneyite EENS.Brother Andre Marie would point out that LG 16 is a speculative  case.So  how could it be a practical exception  to EENS ? LG 16 does not contradict St. Thomas Aquinas on EENS.An invisible person cannot be a visible exception.

Similarly he will knock off CCC 1257' God is not limited to the Sacraments', Romans 1 and 2 as cited by Ralph Martin, 'all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church' which is Pope Benedict's New Theology ( CCC 846), 'elements of sanctification and truth' in other religions (LG 8), 'people of good will' saved outside the Church (GS 22 ) etc. -Lionel Andrades

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2020

Liberal Pattern of Error : Here is how it works with Matt Fradd

 There is a standard approach to error among the Catholic liberals. 

Here is how it works with Matt Fradd.

1. They ignore or reject the strict  interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as cited by the popes and saints.

2.They will cite a passage from Vatican Council II which they will interpret with a false premise, to create a rupture with Tradition, as mentioned in Number 1 above.

3.They may also quote the Catechism of the Catholic Church also interpreted with the false premise, to contradict Number one above.

4.Then some may cite the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 in which the false premise is used to contradict Feeneyite EENS.

5.So their conclusion is that the Church no more teaches the strict interpretation of EENS and  theoretical possibilities are practical exceptions.

LIBERAL EXAMPLE : MATT PRADD

1.St.Thomas Aquinas is never quoted affirming the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

  

THEORETICAL POSSIBILITIES 

1.(Time 35:10) What does Vatican Council II say about people outside the Church being saved ? Well In Lumen Gentium 16 we do read...yes it is possible that those outside the fold will be saved.

2.(57:25) St. Thomas Aquinas refers to the baptism of desire for someone who has not received the baptism of water.

3.(57:47) Whereby God whose power is not tied to visible Sacraments sanctifies man inwardly.

4.(57:59) Hence St. Ambrose says of his friend the Emperor Valintinian that I lost him but he did not lose the grace he prayed for.

5.God is not bound Sacraments ( Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257).

6.(59:17) Those who have an implicit desire for the baptism of water can also be saved.

-Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 25, 2020

Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd and the other liberals do not cite St. Thomas Aquinas affirming the strict interpretation of EENS while they cite theoretical possibilities as practical exceptions to Aquinas

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/11/ralph-martin-scott-hahn-matt-fradd-and.html

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2020

Can You Find Salvation Outside the Church? w/ Steve Ray : Matt Fradd uses the false liberal pattern in the interview with a liberal apologist

 

Matt Fradd uses the false liberal pattern in the interview with fellow liberal Steve Ray.Here are his three steps to error.

1.Matt Fradd does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine.

2

THEORETICAL POSSIBILITIES WHICH ARE EXCEPTIONS TO ST. THOMAS AQUINAS for Steve and Matt.

1.Evangelicals know the faith and live it.

2.God is 'no respecter of persons'.

3.Innocent boy in Africa known to Steve Ray who will be saved as an animist.

4.Catholic Church considers ignorance an factor.

5.Vatican Council II said lets re-define every thing.

6.It is the work of Christ so there can be exceptions.

7.Vatican Council II says there are exceptions. They are saved even outside the Church.

8.We need to work on ecumenism.

9. Those outside the Church are saved through the Church and so they do not need to enter as members.Protestants cannot ve called heretics.

3.So they conclude that there is known salvation outside the Church, phyisically visible cases of non Catholics saved without the Sacraments.These people are objective exceptions  to St. Thomas Aquinas and the saints and popes who affirmed EENS

-Lionel Andrades

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2020

Trent Horn does not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS by St. Thomas Aquinas or the popes and saints. Neither does he interpret Vatican Council II rationally and in harmony with Feeneyite EENS : It is the same with Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd, Steve Ray and other liberals

Trent Horn like the other apologists at Catholic Answers are Christocentric and not ecclesiocentric since it is politically correct with the Left. It is obligatory to avoid ecclesiocentrism, also at EWTN and Catholic Register.

This is 'the content' of Matt Fradd which is approved by Youtube and his sponsors.It would be the same for Jimmy Akins at Catholic Answers.

So they interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise ( instead of without it) and so a false rupture is created with the dogma EENS, as it was known to the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.

So EENS is made obsolete.

The Athanasius Creed is also made obsolete.

The Sylllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX is made obsolete.

Exclusive salvation cited in the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q) is contradicted.

New doctrines are created on salvation which is politically acceptable for the Left and the Vatican. 

The crisis in the Catholic Church is that Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn, Trent Horn, Steve Ray and Matt Fradd  and other liberals do not cite the saints and popes on the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS while they cite hypothetical and speculative possibilities, which exist only in our mind, as being practical exceptions to EENS. This is 'a truth of the faith which is in conflict with the culture' and Ralph Martin and Scott Hahn are not proclaiming it.

 

 

ST.THOMAS AQUINAS IS NEVER QUOTED AFFIRMING THE STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS (EENS).

Inatead he presents hypothetical cases, possibilities as exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS which he does not cite.

(Time. 29:29) Sometimes people say that is it possible for people to be saved without hearing the Gospel. It is. And the Church clearly teaches that, based on Romans Chapter 1 and Romans Chapter 2. And in Section 16 of the Constitution of the Church this is where the Church lays out its definitive teaching on the possibility of people being saved without hearing the Gospel. We really need to know this. We really need to be clear about this. Because there is so much, so much confusion here.What the Council teaches and what we find in the Catechism of the Catholic Church..it's  posible for people under certain circumstances to be saved without hearing the Gospel.What are those circumstances what are those conditions?Ther's three  of them,one is that people have to be inculpably ignorance ot hearing the Gospel.It's not there own fault that they don't know the path to salvation,.they haven't heard and it hasn't been their own fault that they haven't heard.Now sometimes a lot of us have experienced that we have friends, relatives neighbours....-  Ralph Martin.

The crisis in the Catholic Church is that Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn and other liberals do not cite the saints and popes on the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS while they cite hypothetical and speculative possibilities, which exist only in our mind, as being practical exceptions to EENS.

This is 'a truth of the faith which is in conflict with the culture' and Ralph Martin and Scott Hahn are not proclaiming it.-Lionel Andrades

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2020

Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd present a list of false premises to contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus which they do not quote

 Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd present a list of false premises to contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus which they do not quote.

They present 'possibilities' as being objective exceptions to the necessity of all to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.

Indirectly and in a subtle way they suggest that there are visible exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS- the visible exceptions include, Lumen Gentium 16.

Why is LG 16 a visible exception to EENS for Ralph Martin ?

 For me it is unethical to present LG 16 as an exception to St. Thomas Aquinas on EENS, as if there is a visible case of a non Catholic saved outside the Church.

But without these 'visible exceptions' Ralph Martin must affirm the strict interpretation of EENS according to Aquinas and Augustine and he and Fradd and Scott Hahn do not want to do this. -Lionel Andrades

If Pope Benedict did not use the false premise he would be a Feeneyite. If he did not use the New Theology he would be affirming 16th century EENS. It is only as a Cushingite that there can be a development of doctrine with Vatican Council II. Similarly for Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn and Matt Fradd, only with hypothetical cases there can be a development of doctrine on EENS. It is only by projecting invisible cases mentioned in Vatican Council II as being physically visible that there is the familiar development of doctrine of the liberals

 If Pope Benedict did not use the false premise he would be a Feeneyite.

If he did not use the New Theology he would be affirming 16th century EENS.

It is only as a Cushingite that there can be a development of doctrine with Vatican Council II.

Similarly for  Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn and Matt Fradd, only with hypothetical cases there can be a development of doctrine on EENS. It is only by projecting invisible cases mentioned in Vatican Council II as being physically visible that there is the familiar development of doctrine of the liberals. -Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in inculpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically

 

Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in inculpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically. -Lionel Andrades

By assuming 'possibilities' are real people in the present times and 'practical exceptions' to traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church Pope Benedict created the New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Ecclsiology etc.Now Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd like liberals are doing the same thing

 By assuming 'possibilities' are real people in the present times and 'practical  exceptions' to traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church Pope Benedict created the New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Ecclsiology etc.Now Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd like liberals are doing the same thing. -Lionel Andrades

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2020

St.Thomas Aquinas had a Catholic identity. He affirmed the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He did not project invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions to traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. This is common sense. It is common sense that we cannot physically see any exceptions to EENS.This is something obvious in any age. Yet the irrationality, the false premise, is common.It is used by by Matt Fradd, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Trent Horn, Patrick Coffin and Jimmy Akins

 St.Thomas Aquinas had a Catholic identity. He affirmed the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He did not project  invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions to traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. 

This is common sense.

It is common sense that we cannot physically see any exceptions to EENS.This is something obvious in any age.

Yet the irrationality, the false premise, is common.It is used by by Matt Fradd, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Trent Horn, Patrick Coffin and Jimmy Akins. -Lionel Andrades

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2020

Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd and the other liberals do not cite St. Thomas Aquinas affirming the strict interpretation of EENS while they cite theoretical possibilities as practical exceptions to Aquinas

  

  

THEORETICAL POSSIBILITIES 

1.(Time 35:10) What does Vatican Council II say about people outside the Church being saved ? Well In Lumen Gentium 16 we do read...yes it is possible that those outside the fold will be saved.

2.(57:25) St. Thomas Aquinas refers to the baptism of desire for someone who has not received the baptism of water.

3.(57:47) Whereby God whose power is not tied to visible Sacraments sanctifies man inwardly.

4.(57:59) Hence St. Ambrose says of his friend the Emperor Valintinian that I lost him but he did not lose the grace he prayed for.

5.God is not bound Sacraments ( Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257).

6.(59:17) Those who have an implicit desire for the baptism of water can also be saved.

So without confusing possibilities as being real people, we avoid the common false premise and return to Catholic Tradition. There is no room for liberalism and the development of doctrine.

Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd and the other liberals do not cite St. Thomas Aquinas affirming the strict interpretation of EENS while they cite theoretical possibilities as practical exceptions to Aquinas.-Lionel Andrades

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2020

Matt Fradd only interviews Cushingites and then asks them about extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Only those who project hypothetical cases as being objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS, are interviewed and cited. Why does not he interview Brother Andre Marie MICM ? Brother Andre Marie told Anthony Flanders in an interview that speculative theology must not be confused with practical theology.

 Matt Fradd only interviews Cushingites and then asks them about extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Only those who project hypothetical cases as being objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS, are interviewed and cited. Why does not he interview Brother Andre Marie MICM ? Brother Andre Marie told Anthony Flanders in an interview that speculative theology must not be confused with practical theology. -Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd do not outright say that all non Catholics, Protestants included, are on the way to Hell.Since the both of them do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the missionaries.They cannot affirm these Church documents since for them 'theoretical and hypothetical possibilities', which exist only in our mind, are 'objective exceptions' to Tradition( e.g Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) etc). This was the ruse used by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria to reject exclusive salvation being there in only the Catholic Church

 Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd do not outright say that all non Catholics, Protestants included, are on the way to Hell.Since the both of them do not affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the missionaries.They cannot affirm these Church documents since for them 'theoretical and hypothetical possibilities', which exist only in our mind, are 'objective exceptions' to Tradition( e.g Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) etc).

This was the ruse used by Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria to reject exclusive salvation being there in only the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2020

Matt Fradd's sponsors want him to use the three point liberal approach to end triumphalism in the Catholic Church.Catholics are fooled with the irrational premise

Matt Fradd's sponsors want him to  use the three point liberal approach to end triumphalism in the Catholic Church.Catholics are fooled with the irrational premise.

1)  He does not quote the popes and saints on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

2) He cites Vatican Council II confusing what is implicit as being explicit.

3) With alleged known salvation outside the Catholic Church he concludes that the exclusive salvation of the past is obsolete. At least for him, point number one is obsolete.-Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in culpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically

 Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd are liberals since they confuse what is invisible( baptism of desire) as being visible, they confuse what is implicit( saved in culpable ignorance) as being explicit. They confuse what is subjective (LG 8, UR 3 etc) as being objective and then project practical exceptions to the past exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, which they do not affirm theologically. -Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2020

The Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They are always hypothetical. Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers(1965) at Vatican Council II made an objective mistake.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are hypothetical and speculative only.They are not objective exceptions to Tradition(EENS etc). Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd make the same mistake as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Paul VI

 The Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake and Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct.The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). They are always hypothetical.

Pope Paul VI and the Council Fathers(1965) at Vatican Council II made an objective mistake.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are hypothetical and speculative only.They are not objective exceptions to Tradition(EENS etc). Ralph Martin and Matt Fradd make the same mistake as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Pope Paul VI.-Lionel Andrades

SUNDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2020

If Matt Fradd interviewed Brother Andre Marie micm, on EENS, Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) misconceptions would end.He will not be able to project hypothetical and speculative cases as being practical exceptions to EENS, a common mistake

 

If Matt Fradd would interview Brother Andre Marie micm,  on EENS, Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) the stable will come down and the misconceptions will run away.He will no longer be able to pretend that Lumen Gentium 16 is relevant to EENS or an exception to EENS.He will not be able to project hypothetical and speculative cases as being practical exceptions to EENS.

This is a common mistake among the apologists of Catholic Answers whom he has interviewed on no salvation outside the Church. -Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Matt Fradd does not quote St.Thomas Aquinas affirming the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and he presents 'theoretical possibilities' as 'practical exceptions' to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, which he does not affirm

 

Matt Fradd does not quote St.Thomas Aquinas affirming the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and he presents  'theoretical possibilities' as 'practical exceptions' to the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, which he does not affirm. -Lionel Andrades

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2020

Thomas Williams at Breitbart News like Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd,Bishop Robert Barron and the apologists at Catholic Answers, has to use a false premise to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II.

 Thomas Williams at Breitbart News  like Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd,Bishop Robert Barron and the apologists at Catholic Answers,  has to use a false premise to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II. 

Otherwise Breitbart may not employ him.

Now he does not quote St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine on EENS. He is a liberal like Steve Bannon. -Lionel Andrades

Gesù anche noi spesso abbiamo paura come i Tuoi discepoli, anche noi abbiamo bisogno della Tua Pace

The theology of the Lefebvrists is liberal but they project themselves as traditionalists because of the Latin Mass which they offer/attend, with the New Theology and New Ecclesiology created by the Fake Premise,of the liberals

 

Risposte Catholique and other French traditionalist websites use the Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II. It is the same with the FSSP and lay groups at Dijon and other cities of France. Even the community of St. Vincent Ferrer and other Ecclesia Deo communities are interpreting Vatican Council II with the False Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion. So they are allowed to offer/ attend Holy Mass in Latin.

The Nuncio in Paris does the same.

They cannot call upon Catholic political parties and politicians to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and so support Catholic Tradition.

 The Lefebvrists are part of the problem. In reality their theology is liberal but they project themselves as traditionalists because of the Latin Mass which they offer/attend, with the New Theology and New Ecclesiology created by the Fake Premise which they use, like the liberals.-Lionel Andrades

"Desidero che la prima domenica dopo Pasqua sia la Festa della Mia Misericordia": Gesù a S. Faustina

In Birmingham, USA, where EWTN was situated John Martignoni, the Director of the Office of the New Evangelization and Stewardship, said that the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are ‘zero cases’ in our reality. So they do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This was during the tenure of Bishop Baker.

 

The papal posse at EWTN World Over are not proclaiming the Catholic Faith, for political left reasons. Their priority is not to teach the faith to Catholics, in spirit and truth, but first, to protect their careers etc.

Mother Angelica affirmed the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the local bishop wrongly projected LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as exceptions for EENS. This was a false premise. Invisible cases could not be practical exceptions for EENS.

JOHN MARTIGNONI SAYS THE OBVIOUS

In Birmingham,Alabama, USA, where EWTN was situated John Martignoni, the Director of the Office of the New Evangelization and Stewardship, said that the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are ‘zero cases’ in our reality. So they do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This was during the tenure of Bishop Baker.

But in EWTN a Network Gone Wrong(2006)  Christopher Ferrara interpreted Vatican Council II with the same False Premise. So he could not identify this mistake, in EWTN.

CHRISTOPHER FERRARA MADE THE SAME MISTAKE AS EWTN

Ferrara would interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, by confusing what is invisible as being visible. So he produced the familiar ‘practical exceptions’ for Feeneyite EENS.

This was also the error of Fr. Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, the SSPX bishops and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

ARROYO DOES NOT CORRECT THE ERROR

The same False Premise is being used by Raymond Arroyo, Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal who are not correcting the common error in the Church. Neither are they interpreting Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. -Lionel Andrades

 APRIL 24, 2022

The ‘papal posse’ at EWTN World News are dishonestly interpreting Vatican Council II with a False and not Rational Premise and inference, and are informing the National Catholic Reporter, EWTN and Pope Francis, that they accept Vatican Council II. They agree with what I write. There is no denial from them.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-papal-posse-at-ewtn-world-news-are.html

 APRIL 23, 2022

Raymond Arroyo, Fr. Gerald Murray and Robert Royal are permitted on Twitter since they are in a break with the Patristic period with the use of the False Premise: I use the Rational Premise and so there is continuity with Tradition and I am prohibited

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/raymond-arroyo-fr-gerald-murray-and.html

 APRIL 22, 2022

Twitter prohibits conversations: no permission for me when I discuss Vatican Council II ( Rational)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/twitter-prohibits-conversations-no.html

APRIL 19, 2022

The 70 cardinals, bishops and lay theologians who met in Chicago last month, must affirm Vatican Council II. They then will not change the Faith.They will continue to remain in the Catholic Church.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-70-cardinals-bishops-and-lay.html

APRIL 18, 2022

Raymond Arroyo does not respond on Twitter

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/raymong-arroyo-does-not-respond-on.html

APRIL 16, 2022

Raymond Arroyo chooses the False Premise like EWTN

 Raymond Arroyo intentionally interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise like the liberals at the National Catholic Register and so does not use the Rational Premise to affirm Tradition especially the Syllabus of Errors of Pius XII

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/raymond-arroyo-chooses-false-premise.html

APRIL 15, 2022

Raymond Arroyo and Robert Royal interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Ratiional Premise here : they are following the policy of the EWTN

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/raymond-arroyo-and-robert-royal.html