Thursday, May 4, 2023

The Catholic Church is in a general state of schism.

 

Cardinals Kasper, Koch, Nichols, Greco and Hollerich are still in the Catholic Church since Pope Francis has not interpreted Vatican Council II rationally and so ethically. He supports the present schism from the Left. The pope opposes the Magisterium- which must interpret Magisterial Documents rationally. He chooses to be irrational. He chooses to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, with a fake premise and inference. Even the SSPX are part of the schism. They are allowed to build new seminaries and ordain new priests. Since they are in the same camp as the liberals. The liberal-traditionalist division does not depend upon the Latin Mass but the use of the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II etc.

The SSPX can have conferences in the hotels of the USA and continue to publish books as long as they keep interpreting Vatican Council II as a break and not continuity with Tradition. They are allowed to ordain new priests and hold conferences just like the main line Church which also interprets Vatican Council II with the same fake premise and the result is liberalism.

Without the fake premise there is no liberalism and so no liberal-traditionalist division.

Vocations to the religious life are accepted by the SSPX and the main line Church, only from those candidates who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and so reject the Athanasius Creed, change the Nicene Creed and shelve the Syllabus of Errors. It is obligatory for them to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally to avoid the Anti Semitism charge and lose their tax exempt status.

So cardinals Greco, Hollerich, Kasper, Koch and Nichols are in the same boat as sedevcantist bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas. They reject Tradition. They do not interpreting the Council, non-schismatically.They choose to interpret the Council schismatically and so are correct politically, with the Left. Even Bishop Richard Williamson and the bishops he has ordained are on board and the ship is adrift. The Catholic Church is in a general state of schism. - Lionel Andrades

Concordat is schismatic

 

There cannot be a Concordat between a pro-Satan secular state in Italy and a Vatican State in schism, caused with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Church has a rational option, which can only be traditional like historical Rome. It would oppose the present Government in Italy, on faith and morals.- Lionel Andrades


 JULY 17, 2013

Vatican Council II does not contradict the Concordat of 1929

The Concordat of 1929  signed by Pope Pius XI (and the Italian government) made Catholicism the sole religion of the state (although other religions were tolerated), paid salaries to priests and bishops, recognized church marriages (previously couples had to have a civil ceremony), and brought religious instruction into the public schools. In turn, the bishops swore allegiance to the Italian state, which had a veto power over their selection.-Wikipedia
 
In 1965 Vatican Council II stated all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation (AG 7) and those saved in invincible ignorance etc (LG 16), reason tells us,are  not known exceptions to AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So Vatican Council II in doctrine and theology supported Pope Pius XI and Italy being a Catholic State.
Papst Pius XI. 1JS.jpg 
Pope Pius XI condemned, in his 1928 encyclical, Mortalium Animos, the idea that Christian unity could be attained by establishing a broad federation of many bodies holding varying doctrines (the widespread view among Protestant ecumenists); rather, the Catholic Church was the one true Church, all her teachings were objectively true, and Christian unity could only be by achieved by non-Catholic denominations rejoining the Catholic Church and accepting the doctrines they had rejected.-Wikipedia
 
  Vatican Council II( AG 7) says all need Catholic Faith for salvation. All include Christians. So Vatican Council II in doctrine and theology agrees with Pope Pius XI's concept of ecumenism.
 
Political parties in Italy need to acknowledge that Vatican Council II supports the traditional Catholic teaching on other religions and salvation. It mentions the necessity of all Christians, Orthodox Christians and Protestants, entering the Church for salvation, it affirms the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So it reinforces Primacy being there in only the Catholic Church. According to Vatican Council II (AG 7) there cannot be a Collegiality which suggests  non Catholic religions, or other Christians, are in religions which are paths to salvation.
 
Vatican Council II is traditional.
 
The Council is not traditional for the leftist media in Italy and abroad, since they confuse in principle statements mentioned in Vatican Council II as being defacto and known to us in the present times.They assume that what is mentioned as implicit, in principle and in theory are real and known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Catholic Tradition.
 
The leftist media also use this false premise, of assuming we can see the dead saved in invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word etc, to criticize the literal interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation.They claim it is  no more  valid. So they  suggest that Vatican Council II contradicted the Concordat of 1929 which made Catholicism the State Religion.They interpert Vatican Council II with the Richard Cushing Error.

Without the Richard Cushing Error Vatican Council II is as traditional as Pope Pius XI. Catholic political parties in Italy have still to acknowledge this.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2013/07/vatican-council-ii-does-not-contradict.html

I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Bible (John 3:5, Mark 16:16), Vatican Council II (LG 14, LG 16) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 etc. This is my Catholic Faith. I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being invisible and hypothetical cases in 2023 and so they do not contradict LG 14 and AG 7 or the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition for me.

 


I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Bible (John 3:5, Mark 16:16), Vatican Council II (LG 14, LG 16) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 etc. This is my Catholic Faith. I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being invisible and hypothetical cases in 2023 and so they do not contradict LG 14 and AG 7 or the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition for me.

I affirm the past faith and morals. There is no liberalism for me since I interpret the Council rationally. I also do not repeat the mistake of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO).It confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS i.e. EENS according to the Church Councils (1215, 1442).So there is no New Theology of LOHO for me. There is no new ecclesiology with Vatican Council II.Since I interpret the Council, without the invisible-visible confusion. There is no new ecumenism for me, since there is nothing in the Council-text to contradict EENS according to the Church Councils. I do not have to choose between Feeneyite EENS and hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire (BOD). Invisible cases of BOD do not contradict the Council of Florence on EENS, with no exceptions. The popes and saints of the past, when they mentioned the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance did not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS, of the Church Councils ( Fourth Lateran Council etc).  -Lionel Andrades


OCTOBER 2, 2021

I affirm Church Teachings and Documents. Vatican Council II is an ally

 



I AFFIRM CHURCH TEACHINGS 

When Vatican Council II is interpreted with the Rational Premise the Council is an ally. We can affirm Tradition along with Vatican Council II.

I affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church but I only interpret Church documents with the rational premise. So there is no rupture with the past Magisterium and Catholic Tradition.

LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949

I affirm the first part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is not contradicted by the second half for me.Since the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only in 2021. They could not have been practical exceptions to Feenyite EENS in 1949. Pope Pius XII and the popes who followed made an objective mistake.The present popes continue with the mistake and expect all Catholics to follow them.So the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the College of Cardinals is also irrational and non Magisterial.

CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X

I affirm the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 29 Q) on other religions.It is not contradicted by that same Catechism mentioning those who are saved in invincible ignorance. Similarly I affirm Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) which is not contradicted by Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance).LG 16 is always a hypothetical case.Only God can know if someone is saved in invincible ignorance.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 are always hypothetical.So they do not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. 

Similarly the Vatican Council II, Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, is always hypothetical.So does not contradict the past ecumenism of return or the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.

ATHANASIUS CREED

Similarly I affirm the Athanasius Creed which says all need Catholic faith for salvation.I  do not know of any practical exception in the present times.

DOGMA EENS

I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and I accept hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance. I do not have to reject them.Since they can only be hypothetical, always.

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

I affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846 Outside the Church No Savation) with Ad Gentes 7 saying all need faith and baptism. I do not know of any exception.There is no exception mentioned in the phrase , ' all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church'.The priority is membership in the Catholic Church, with 'faith and baptism' to avoid Hell ( for salvation).We do not separate Jesus from His Mystical Body the Catholic Church.The norm for salvation is faith and baptism.

Similarly I know that 'the Church knows of no means to eternal beatitude other than the baptism of water'(CCC 1257) and that there are no practical exceptions.Theoretically 'God is not limited to the Sacraments', and practically all need the baptism of water and Catholic faith,always, to avoid Hell.There are no practical exceptions for the norm for salvation.

NICENE CREED

In the Nicene Creed, we say 'one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'. This refers to one baptism, the baptism of water, which is physically visible. I cannot administer the baptism of desire and it is not known to us human beings.So there is one baptism and not three or more known baptisms.There are no known baptisms which exclude the baptism of water.There is no literal baptism of desire, as says, Bishop Athanasius Schneider in the recent interview with Dr. Taylor Marshall.

FOUR MARKS OF THE CHURCH

So the Four Marks of the Church( one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic) must include affirming all Church documents with the rational and not irrational premise.

APOSTLES CREED

In the Apostles Creed, we say "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church".The Holy Spirit guides the Catholic Church even today, to say that outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation.This would be interpreting the Apostles Creed with the rational premise.Otherwise the Creed would be saying outside the Church there is known salvation.

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS DOGMATIC

Vatican Council II is dogmatic and supports traditional EENS, with LG 8, LG 16 etc not being practical exceptions in the present times.

For Pope Paul VI, Vatican Council was pastoral and not dogmatic, since he used the false premise to create a break with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc.If he had interpreted the Council with a rational premise then the Council would also be dogmatic in 1965.It would make Fr. John Courtney Murray sj, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger, Fr. Yves Congar op and Fr. Karl Rahner sj unable to theologicallysupport their liberalism.There would not be a New Theology.

CHURCH IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH TRADITIONAL RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, MISSION

Since the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are always hypothetical, theoretical and speculative only, they do not contradict the Church's traditional ecclesiocentrism. 

These are the teachings and documents of the Catholic Church which I affirm.  -Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/i-affirm-church-teachings-and-documents.html


At Medugorje Our Lady is present there. People can feel it. People say something is going on here.

Third visit to Medugorje!

Sunrise Medjugorje 'The Blue Hour' | May 04, 2023

Pope Francis is not announcing that the polygamy of the Synod is a mortal sin like adultery and that Sister Nathalie Bequart interprets Vatican Council II schismatically and dishonestly. It is not Magisterial when she and Pope Francis interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being explicit and not implicit, visible and not invisible cases in 1965-2023.They both contradict common sense.

 

Pope Francis is not announcing that the  polygamy of the Synod is a mortal sin like adultery and that Sister Nathalie Bequart interprets Vatican Council II schismatically and dishonestly. It is not Magisterial when she and Pope Francis interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being explicit and not implicit, visible and not invisible cases in 1965-2023.So they both contradict common sense. They also contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction when they confuse something invisible as being physically visible in the present times.How can we see someone in Heaven and on earth at the same time?

How can we physically see alleged non Catholics, saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire (LG 14) or in invincible ignorance (LG 16), who are now in Heaven but also visible to the both of them, on earth? They are visible in Heaven and on earth at the same time to the both of them? So invisible cases of LG 14 and LG 16 are practically visible for them and so are objective examples of salvation outside the Church. They then become objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as defined by the Fourth Lateran Council (1215)? So there is a new theology for them. It says outside the Church there is known salvation in the present times (1965-2023).

Who among us has seen or met someone saved in imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3)?

Who among us has seen someone saved outside the visible boundaries of the Church, where the Catholic Church ‘subsists’?

Who among us knows of a Catholic who has been saved in another religion where ‘the seeds of the Word lie hidden’ (AG 11) ? No one. There are no such cases in our human reality.

If someone is saved with that ‘ray of truth’ which enlightens all men (NA 2) it can only be known to God. The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14).

So Sister Bequart cannot confuse what is invisible as being visible, implicit as being explicit, subjective as being objective and then say that the Council is non-traditional and so polygamy can be approved and so also, LGBT sexual relations. - Lionel Andrades



 MAY 3, 2023

We are in schism.

 

We are in schism. There is a schism from the Left. They are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally to produce a break with the Magisterial Church. It is a fake break with Tradition. It is approved by the popes from Paul VI who interpret the Council with a fake premise and inference. This interpretation is different from those of us who interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly.

Since the popes support the schism in faith and morals, doctrine and theology the mainline Church follows this error.

How can we have a pope who intentionally interprets the Council irrationally while so many of interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so honestly?

Interpreting the Council irrationally even after being informed is public heresy. It is a disqualification as a pope.

Interpreting the Council irrationally changes the meaning of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. This is public schism. It is schism, a break with the past Magisterium and a rejection of Catholic Canon Law.

The Judges at the Vatican Supreme Tribunal are also expected to be honest and to inform the pope of his error.

Cardinals and bishops are obliged morally to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and to inform the pope of his error.

Pope Francis must make the correction in public. It could mean that cardinals like Kasper, Koch and Nichols may not want to remain in the Catholic Church any more. Since it will demand a big change in their style, even maybe actual martyrdom.

We now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional. So Pope Francis, can no more cite Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally, to justify his liberalism and innovation, supporting mortal sins of faith and morals, in public.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/we-are-in-schism.html

AY 3, 2023

Polygamy is adultery for Catholics and is a mortal sin which takes a soul to Hell. Even LGBT sexual relations are a mortal sin. Sister Nathalie Bequart, Consultant, to the Synod for the Vatican, is in schism.

 

Polygamy is adultery for Catholics and is a mortal sin which takes a soul to Hell. Even LGBT sexual relations are a mortal sin. Sister Nathalie Bequart, Consultant, to the Synod for the Vatican, is in schism. When she interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. In this way she changes the original understanding of the Nicene Creed, rejects the Athanasius Creed, re-interprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as having exceptions, changes the meaning of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance mentioned in the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X.

The Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX is made obsolete with this ruse.

Bequart is a public modernist supporting public mortal sin at the Synods along with Cardinal Greco who has come out of nowhere to be made a cardinal.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church indicates that Pope Francis and the Synod support scandal and mortal sin.

Also divorce and re-marriage are mortal sins which cannot be justified with Vatican Council II, interpreted only schismatically. The pope has an obligation to interpret the Council only rationally. This is being honest and not dishonest.

George Melloni and Matteo Salvini who have been living in sin are not correcting Pope Francis and ending the non separation of the Catholic Church and the Leftist State, which they represent. - Lionel Andrades


APRIL 30, 2023

Pope Francis supports public heresy and schism when he does not affirm Vatican Council II interpreted rationally in harmony with the past Magisterium. It is not Magisterial when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly. He must correct the mistake in public. Also when the Synod interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly, it is schism. It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries.

 

When the Synod supports polygamy and adultery it is a mortal sin. It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries. But also when the Synod interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly, it is schism. It is schism with the Magisterium over the centuries. Since it changes the original interpretation of the Nicene Creed and rejects the Athanasius Creed. There are false interpretations of the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X.

There is a new interpretation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. It changes the understanding of Magisterial Documents, Creeds and Catechisms. It makes the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, obsolete.

This is the present official and public heresy of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. It has been the political position on doctrine and theology for the popes from Paul VI to Francis. This is papal schism.

We now know that the norm is the rational interpretation of the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16).

The norm is a rational interpretation of BOD and I.I when they are mentioned in the Catechisms of Trent ( BOD) and Pius X ( I.I) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 847-848-invincible ignorance).

We now know that the norm is the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II (LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, and NA 2, GS 22 etc).

So Sister Nathalie Bequart, Consultant to the Vatican on the Synod, is in schism when she says that the doctrines of the Synod are based upon Vatican Council II- and means only Vatican Council II irrational and not rational.

Cardinal Hollerich and Cardinal Greco are in schism when they do not affirm Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.

Pope Francis supports public heresy and schism when he does not affirm Vatican Council II interpreted rationally in harmony with the past Magisterium.

It is not Magisterial when Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and dishonestly. He must correct the mistake in public.  -Lionel Andrades

________________________

APRIL 29, 2023

When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally and ethically it is Magisterial. It is not political. So when Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, England, and the English bishops, rectors and seminarians interpret Vatican Council II politically and unethically, they are in schism.

 

When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally and ethically it is Magisterial. It is not political. So when Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, England, and the English bishops, rectors and seminarians interpret Vatican Council II politically and unethically, they are in schism.

They are choosing heresy to please the Jewish Left. They want a rupture with Tradition when there is no rupture.

So they intentionally choose schism and are supported by Pope Francis.

It is the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, which is in official schism when they do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ethically, like those of us who do so.

Cardinal Nichols chooses to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and schismatically and this way the liberalism remains in the Church.

Cardinal Nichols will not tell Catholics in Britain to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, ethically and non schismatically, for then the Church will be affirming exclusive salvation, the Church will return to orthodoxy.

With the rational premise and inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II:

1)         There will be no exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the text of Vatican Council II.

2)       Lumen Gentium 14 and Ad Gentes 7 would support the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) on EENS with no known exceptions.

So if the pope tomorrow interprets Vatican Council II rationally, ethically and non schismatically, Cardinal Nichols and the British bishops and cardinals will choose the prevailing schism.They could break away from the Church.

When Pope Benedict and Fr. Federico Lombardi sj, initially supported Bishop Richard Williamson , the English ecclesiastics and laity supported the Jewish Left and not the Catholic bishop from England. This was their priority in public. Now if the CDF asks them to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, they will  reject the CDF and support the Left.

Since we know that we can interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ethically Cardinal Nichols is already in schism. He is dishonest for political reasons.  - Lionel Andrades




THESE ARE INVISIBLE CASES FOR ME BUT PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CASES FOR THE BRITISH CARDINALS AND BISHOPS.THEY HAVE TO BE VISIBLE FOR THEM.IT IS ONLY IN THIS IRRATIONAL WAY THAT THEY CAN BE EXCEPTIONS FOR EENS AND THE PAST ECCLESIOCENTRIS ECCLESIOLOGY.


This Church constituted and organized in the world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him,(13*) although many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible structure. These elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ, are forces impelling toward catholic unity.- Lumen Gentium 8, Vatican Council II

 Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own. - Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II

 But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator… Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience.- Lumen Gentium 16, Vatican Council II.

 Moreover, some and even very many of the significant elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church itself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church: the written word of God; the life of grace; faith…

… These liturgical actions must be regarded as capable of giving access to the community of salvation. – Unitatis Redintigratio 3 Vatican Council II

The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men– Nostra Aetate 2, Vatican Council II.

All this holds true not only for Christians, but for all men of good will in whose hearts grace works in an unseen way. For, since Christ died for all men, and since the ultimate vocation of man is in fact one, and divine, we ought to believe that the Holy Spirit in a manner known only to God offers to every man the possibility of being associated with this paschal mystery.- Gaudium et Specs 22, Vatican Council II

 


VISIBLE CASES FOR POPE FRANCIS, THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS

THESE ARE VISIBLE CASES FOR POPE FRANCIS, THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS.THIS IS AN ERROR.THE ERROR IS NOT MAGISTERIAL.

THESE ARE REFERENCES TO VISIBE CASES IN 2023. THEY ARE VISIBLE EXAMPLES OF SALVATION OUTSIDE THE CHURCH FOR THE POPES FROM PAUL VI TO FRANCIS. THEY ARE OBJECTIVE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS, THE ATHANASIUS CREED..THIS IS AN OFFICIAL AND PUBLIC ERROR OF THE CDF.

POPE FRANCIS IS NOT MAGISTERIAL ON

 

VATICAN COUNCIL II AT PRESENT.

 

 

This Church constituted and organized in the world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him,(13*) although many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of its visible structure. These elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ, are forces impelling toward catholic unity.- Lumen Gentium 8, Vatican Council II

 Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own. - Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II

 But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator… Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience.- Lumen Gentium 16, Vatican Council II.

 Moreover, some and even very many of the significant elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church itself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church: the written word of God; the life of grace; faith…

… These liturgical actions must be regarded as capable of giving access to the community of salvation. – Unitatis Redintigratio 3 Vatican Council II

The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men– Nostra Aetate 2, Vatican Council II.

All this holds true not only for Christians, but for all men of good will in whose hearts grace works in an unseen way. For, since Christ died for all men, and since the ultimate vocation of man is in fact one, and divine, we ought to believe that the Holy Spirit in a manner known only to God offers to every man the possibility of being associated with this paschal mystery.- Gaudium et Specs 22, Vatican Council II

 THERE IS EXCLUSIVE SALVATION IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TODAY FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THE BRITISH CARDINALS AND BISHOPS.VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS EXCEPTIONS FOR EENS FOR THEM BUT NOT FOR ME.IF THERE WERE NO EXCEPTIONS POPE FRANCIS AND THE LEFT WOULD ACCUSE THEM OF BEING 'TRIUMPHALISTIC'.



14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism124 and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church…- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.-Ad Gentes 7

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 845-846

845 To reunite all his children, scattered and led astray by sin, the Father willed to call the whole of humanity together into his Son's Church. The Church is the place where humanity must rediscover its unity and salvation. The Church is "the world reconciled." She is that bark which "in the full sail of the Lord's cross, by the breath of the Holy Spirit, navigates safely in this world." According to another image dear to the Church Fathers, she is prefigured by Noah's ark, which alone saves from the flood.- Catechism of the Catholic Church

 846 …Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door…

 Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.-Athanasius Creed

 Fourth Lateran Council (1215): "There is but one  universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved."


So the British cardinals and bishops wrongly confuse invisible cases as being objective examples of salvation outside the Church and visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition. So EENS is made obsolete with this ruse.There is no controversy with the Chief Rabbinate of Israel and the Zionists. They  maintain 'good relations with the Jewish Left'.

- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/04/when-vatican-council-ii-is-interpreted.html