Michael Nazir Ali has supported the liberal Catholic-Lutheran Joint Declaration on Justification which is null and void since it was based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with a False Premise.Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger assumed that there was known salvation outside the Catholic Church.This is false.There are no personally known non Catholic saved without faith and the baptism of water since 1965.None in the past nor the present. If Pope Benedict had interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then Vatican Council II would be ecclesiocentric and the Lutherans would theologically, be outside the Catholic Church, where there is no salvation.
When the Lutherans are outside the Church and so on
the way to Hell what difference does it make on what concept of justification
that they hold.
There is no known salvation outside the Catholic
Church since if any one was saved as such , past or present, it could only be
known to God.
Similarly the Synods which MNA refer to also interpret
Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise so the development of doctrine is
suspect. It is not binding on Catholics.He says the Church cannot change Church
teachings but believes there can be a development of doctrine with the Synods.
So in the past it was outside the Church there is no salvation and now it is
the opposite.
MNA could interpret the Council with the Rational Premise
and then it will be the end of liberalism for him. He could be excommunicated
like Fr. Vaughn Treco.
There is liberalism and doctrinal division opposed to
Tradition in the Catholic Church presently, since all camps are using the Fake
Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents. There is a break with the
orthodoxy of the pope and the saints who did not interpret the baptism of
desire and invincible ignorance with the Fake Premise i.e invisible cases are
really visible.
The Catholic bishops who will ordain MNA a deacon and
priest are liberals.They will not affirm the traditional strict interpretation
of extra ecclesiam nulla salus
and the only way possible to deny it theologically is by using the Fake Premise
i.e there are physically invisible cases of the baptism of desire in
England this year, these are known people who are saved without Catholic faith
and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.
So they have to use the Fake Premise to create a fake
break with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam
nulla salus.They will do the same for Vatican Council II,LG 8, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc.
Of course if MNA was not a liberal they could not
ordain him nor welcome him in the Catholic Church.
Now the Left can make him a cardinal or future pope
since he is not using the Rational Premise and remains a liberal i.e someone
approved by the Masons.
His interpretation of Scripture is not
Catholic but neither is that of Pope Benedict, since both are Christocentric
and not also Ecclesiocentric.The liberal German pope approved married men as
priests now it is to be seen if even the divorced and remarried can remain
priests.
Without the False Premise they all have to
return to the old theology and interpret the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus
of Errors as having no known exceptions.The Catechism of Pope Pius X, 29Q, on
invincible ignorance, does not contradict 24Q and 27Q on outside the Church
there is no salvation.
With the Rational Premise the Catechism of the
Catholic Church 847 and 848 also on invincible ignorance will not contradict
CCC 846 which cites Ad Gentes 7.It states all need faith and baptism for
salvation. CCC 847 and 848 would also not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.
The desire thereof, the phrase in the
Catechism of the Council of Trent, does not contradict that Catechism when it
supports Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 on extra ecclesiam nulla
salus.The baptism of desire is always hypothetical.
So presently Pope Benedict and Pope Francis
are not apostolic on this issue and neither is MNA.
The rejection of the past Magisteriium on the
Creeds, Catechisms etc, with the use of the Fake Premise, results in schism.It
is public heresy.Practical exceptions are projected for the traditional
interpretation of the Nicene Creed.
The Nicene Creed changes. It says that we
believe in three or more known baptisms which exclude the baptism of water in
the Catholic Church and so there are practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam
nulla salus etc. This is all approved by Pope Francis and the ADL.
In the past the Magisterium taught outside the
Church there is no salvation. Now they say outside the Church there is
salvation.This cannot be Magisterial. At one time a mistake was made.The one,
holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, the Four Marks of the Nicene Creed, cannot
teach two different things.
Presently there is no real evangelisation too.Since
Jesus is proclaimed without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church
with Catholic faith and the baptism of water, as mentioned in Ad Gentes 7.
Since Pope Benedict rejects the Athanasius Creed, the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and
the Syllabus of Errors his interpretation of Scripture is not apostolic. It
would be the same for MNA.His Holy Mass would be irregular in as much as that
of Cardinal Vince Nicols who will ordain him. Will it be valid ?
Pope Benedict should correct the common error. He cannot go to the next life with all this confusion on Vatican Council II left behind, which MNA will have to follow. Lionel Andrades
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/convert-bishop-counters-protestant-critics
Posts
