Pro Aborts disrupt London abortion survivors testimony at London's March for Life

by Church Militant  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  May 11, 2019    

Thousands kneel to pray in repentance for Britain

By Dr. Jules Gomes

Militant abortion advocates attempted to disrupt and drown out an abortion survivor's testimony at London's March for Life as they parodied a popular song and sang "We need abortion and if it's quite all right."

More than 5,000 pro-lifers gathered on May 11 to mark Lifefest 19, the second London-based rally, organized by the U.K.'s March for Life movement.

Marching under the banner of "Life from Conception: No Exception," thousands knelt in prayers of repentance for the nation, after a procession from Emmanuel Centre, Westminster, to the Houses of Parliament in the heart of London.

Abortion survivor: 'My medical records indicate that I soaked in that toxic solution for five days.'

Tweet

Melissa Ohden, who survived

a saline abortion

People were shedding tears as Melissa Ohden from the United States shared her testimony of how she survived a "failed" saline infusion abortion 41 years ago after being soaked in a toxic salt solution that was injected into her mother's amniotic fluid, meant to slowly scald her to death.

"My medical records indicate that I soaked in that toxic solution for five days — two days longer than what was typical for the procedure," she told the shocked audience. "No mercy was shown to me over those five days. There was no mistake made that spared my life."

"On that fifth day of the saline infusion abortion, my birth mother's labor was finally induced," she continued. "I should have been delivered dead, as a successful abortion, a deceased child. But quite clearly, God had other plans that day for me."

Pro-lifers shouted "Hallelujah" and cheered as she spoke.

Ohden recounted how her grandmother demanded that the nurses leave her to die when she saw the abortion had failed. "Leaving children to die, making them 'comfortable' while we discuss what will happen to them is infanticide," she said, referring to recent U.S. debates, "as some lawmakers work to protect abortion to the point that they would deny us protection and in doing so, continue to mark us for death."

Continued

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pro-aborts-disrupt-abortion-survivors-testimony-at-londons-march-for-life

Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri calls heresy and mortal sins of faith magisterial.

Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri  misuses the word Magisterium. 1 Since it is not magisterial to suggest that  unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance( I.I) and Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Unitatitis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate  2, Gaudium et Spec 22 etc in Vatican Council II are known exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) which he will not affirm.This is also the irrationality of the present two popes.

Cardinal Baldiserri and Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, President of the Italian Episcopal Conference,cannot support the moral errors mentioned in the Open Letter to the Bishops and then brush it all off as the pope being always magisterial.This is not true.Since the pope also goes for Confession. He acknowledges that he makes mistakes and is a sinner.

Cardinal Lorenzo Baldiserri  does not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and neither do the present two popes.This is heresy.It is not being magisterial. Since EENS has been defined by three Church Councils.He contradicts the past Magisterium on faith and salvation.He is rejecting a  de fide, ex cathedra teaching.This is all done by misinterpreting Vatican Council II even after the ruse has been discovered.

This is all heresy which he does not deny . Instead he must acknowledge that he is in a mortal sin of faith and go for Confession.Since he is in a public scandal.Like the popes and cardinals he does not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and inference.

Cardinal Baldiserri and the popes simply have to announce that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. This is reality.They are not practical exceptions to EENS, the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return.So the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church has not changed.

Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office 1949(CDF) was wrong. Since there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance.No one saw a Catholic saved in Heaven without the baptism of water and instead only with the baptism of desire.
His new theology is based upon there being literal cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so there is known salvation outside the Church.
So he would not say that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell.He calls this denial of the faith,on Vatican Council II and an ex cathedra teaching - magisterial.
The Paulist Fathers and the religious community of St. Camillio de Lellis had a false ecumenical Way of the Cross procession in Rome based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He does not call it heresy but magisterial.


Pope Francis will not tell the Lutherans that they are all going to Hell according to Vatican Council II and EENS . How can this be magisterial? This is heretical.
He did not tell his co-signatory at Abu Dhabi that he and all Muslims are oriented to Hell according to Vatican Council II and EENS. Since they will die without the necessary faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church(AG 7).
Instead in Evangelli Gaudium Pope Francis promotes the kerygma without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church. It is a denial of EENS, the past ecclesiology and Vatican Council II(AG 7).This should be clarified.
Pope Francis also approved of the Emeritus pope saying in March 2016 that  Vatican Council II was a development of EENS.The Council-text nowhere contradicts the traditional interpretation of EENS.This is heresy.It is the heresy of the two popes.

Pope Francis approved Cardinal Luiz Ladaria saying in March 2018 that Lumen Gentium 8 was an exception to EENS.Where is the literal case of a non Catholic saved with 'elements of sanctification and truth outside the Church' ? There are none. So EENS and Vatican Council II are heretic ally being interpreted. This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
Pope Francis overlooks the International Theological Commission error. In two theological papers they reject Feeneyite EENS.They project BOD, BOB and I.I as being practical exceptions to EENS. The ITC also assumes LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  are exceptions to EENS.This is irrational and deceptive.The heresy is being obstinately and persistently being repeated.
On the plane after the Abu Dhabi meeting it was false for Pope Francis to cite Vatican Council II. Since Vatican Council II does not contradict Feeneyite EENS. Also Ad Gentes 7 supports EENS according to the Magisterium of the 16th century.
He did not tell the Muslims that they are oriented to Hell without faith and baptism(AG 7).This is the teaching of the Catholic Church in Vatican Council II.Mohammad was outside the Church; Jesus Mystical Body, the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood(Catechism of the Catholic Church 845).The understanding of God and Jesus in the Quran is heretical for Catholics.It is a mortal sin of faith for Catholics.Muslims are not to receive the Eucharist at the Catholic Holy Mass, as is being done today in Rome,since they are outside the Catholic Church.
Then in 2016 the Secretaties of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) informed Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior at the St. Benedict Center in the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire that CCC 847-848 ( invincible ignorance) are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.How can unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance be exceptions to EENS? Again with an irrationality the dogma EENS as it was interpreted by the popes and saints and the Magisterium in the 16th century is being rejected. This is public heresy. The statement of the CDF Secretaries has been posted on the official website of the Diocese of Manchester.
This is all evidence of heresy which is being obstinately and persistently continued.
There is no moral authority in the Catholic Church which affirms exclusive salvation.-Lionel Andrades

 1

MAY 11, 2019

For discerning Catholics this is all deception and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit the interpretation of the two popes is based upon a factual error. It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This cannot be the Magisterium  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/for-discerning-catholics-this-is-all.html

_______________________________

 MAY 11, 2019

Mortal sins of faith need to be confessed in the Sacrament of Reconciliaition like mortal sins of morals

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/mortal-sins-of-faith-need-to-be.html

MAY 10, 2019

Roberto dei Mattei is in heresy like the present two popes : bad reasoning, bad philosophy and theology, innovation and scandal and mortal sins of faith 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/roberto-dei-mattei-is-in-heesy-like.html

 

MAY 9, 2019

Signatory of Open Letter to Bishops also in heresy 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/signatory-of-open-letter-to-bishops.html

 

MAY 8, 2019

It is formal heresy when the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is rejected, the Athanasius Creed is made obsolete, the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and Apostles Creed changed and Vatican Council II is wrongly interpreted as a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms by using a false premise and inference 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/incomplete-it-is-formal-heresy-when.html

 

MAY 7, 2019

Evidence of mortal sins of faith 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/evidence-of-mortal-sins-of-faith.html

 

MAY 7, 2019

The present two popes interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism.The result is heresy

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-present-two-popes-interpret-vatican.html

 MAY 8, 2019

It is formal heresy when the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is rejected, the Athanasius Creed is made obsolete, the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and Apostles Creed changed and Vatican Council II is wrongly interpreted as a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms by using a false premise and inference

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/incomplete-it-is-formal-heresy-when.html