The sedevacantists today are Cushingite and so were the popes from Paul VI whom they do not accept.They have chosen sedevacantism because of Vatican Council II(Cushingite).The Council can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism and the sedevacantists and the popes from Paul VI, chose Cushingism.

The sedevacantists today are Cushingite and so were the popes from Paul VI  whom they do not accept.They have chosen sedevacantism  because of Vatican Council II(Cushingite).The Council can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism and the sedevacantists  and the popes from Paul VI, chose Cushingism.

Mystici Corporis of Pope Pius XII can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism, but when Pius XII did not defend Fr. Leonard Feeney and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) , he was supporting Cushingism.

He allowed the Church to assume hypothetical cases were objectively seen. It was assumed then that the baptism of desire (BOD),Baptism of blood(BOB)  and invincible ignorance(I.I) were literal cases.They were literal examples of salvation outside the Church. So EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors etc became obsolete. They were all Feeneyite.Hypothetical cases were interpreted as just being hypothetical in these magisterial documents.Now exceptions were projected by the Cushingites.

Then they criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney. Since literally -known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I would be exceptions to traditional EENS.

There are sedevacantists like Bishop Mark Pivaranus and Bishop Donald Sanborn who interpret the Church Fathers, Medieval Fathers and the popes before the 1930's as also being Cushingite when they really were Feeneyite. Since BOD,BOB and I.I did not contradict their strict interpretation of EENS. While affirming hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I they were still endorsing the strict interpretation of the Council.

So with this superficial interpretation of BOD, BOB and I.I they criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney.

Bishop Sanborn and Fr. Anthony Cekada have written articles on line in which they mention the saints referring to BOD, BOB and I.I.Then they interpret these references with Cushingism and project them as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.They then claim the saints over history contradict Fr. Leonard Feeney.They interpret the popes, on BOD, BOB and I.I in the same way.So it is no surprise that they reject Vatican Council II when the fault lies with their false premise and conclusion.

Jim Farrell wrote an article critical of Fr. Leonard Feeney, on Church Militant TV. He interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism. He did not think this was strange and unusual. So his conclusion was that the traditional , centuries old interpretation of EENS was strange. His reasoning was not strange for him.He was using the same reasoning as the sedevacantists.

This mistake has been pointed out many times to Michael and Peter Dimond. They cannot make the transition from a Cushingite Vatican Council II to a Feeneyite Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades

We are a Cushingite Church and a Cushingite Church cannot be magisterial . It is a rupture with Tradition which is Feeneyite.Tradition is rational.Cushingism is irrational. Michael Voris and Brother Andre Marie MICM want to be faithful to a Cushingite 'magisterium'.

We are a Cushingite Church and a Cushingite Church cannot be magisterial . It is a rupture with Tradition which is Feeneyite.Tradition is rational.Cushingism is irrational.

Michael Voris and Brother Andre Marie MICM want to be faithful to a Cushingite 'magisterium'.

The Cushingite Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) wants the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary to accept a Cushingite version of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) or legally be considered not Catholic.

The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) already accepts a  Cushingite version of EENS. Now if they accept a Cushingite version of Vatican Council II they will be given canonical recognition.It is difficult for them to switch to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite). Fr. Francois Laisney wrote a book , Is Feeneyism Catholic? which is sold by the SSPX Angelus Press. He interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism.Archbishop Lefebvre was a Cushingite on Vatican Council II and EENS.

The SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 was mysteriously Feeneyite  and they were ignored by a Cushingite Pope Benedict.

Then if the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism they will be considered Anti Semitic etc by the Jewish Left.The Cushingite CDF could still excommunicate them.

If they affirm Vatican Council II with Cushingism it is heresy. They know this. If they affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, there will be persecution.

-Lionel Andrades