Saturday, August 28, 2021

Homenaje musical a la Virgen María | Musical tribute to Virgin Mary

MEDJUGORJE testimonianza di padre Eugenio La Barbera – 3 Piccoli Passi

So we proclaim the Faith and return to traditional mission as at the time of St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier

So we proclaim the Faith and return to traditional mission as at the time of St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier. All non Catholics are oriented to Hell according to Bishop Athanasius Schneider and not only those ‘who know’ about Jesus and the Church(LG 14) – since invincible ignorance is no more a practical exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).All in general need faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7) and if there are any exceptions of those 'who know' or 'do not know' it could only be known to God.So there are no known practical exceptions for the Great Commission.

The Council Fathers (1965) made an objective error when they projected  the baptism of desire(LG 14) as an exception to EENS according to Loyola, Bellarmine and Xavier.This mistake was there in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston(LOHO).Pope Benedict needs to issue a correction and apologise. Since his New Theology is based upon the false premise of the LOHO.

The false premise of Pope Benedict is now a theological virus that has spread in the Catholic Church, like an epidemic. He has to end it.He must correct Pope Francis’ mistake, which is also that of the College of Cardinals.

Pope Benedict needs to tell Pope Francis that all the books on Vatican Council II have got the ‘virus’ and so are useless.They were made irrelevant with the error. Also Pope Benedict’s books on Ecclesiology published by Ignatius Press, and in the many German editions,  have to be phased out. The pontifical universities must note the error in the books on Ecclesiology, written also by Semeraro, Kasper and Forte.

Pope Benedict wanted the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to keep interpreting the baptism of desire(LG 14) as referring to to literal cases, presently known to us. So they would have to interpret Vatican Council II (LG 14 etc) in principle, by confusing invisible cases as being physically visible. Then with this irrationality they would have to accept the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition, which would follow with the use of the false premise. It was only with this doctrinal and theological error, was he prepared to grant the SSPX canonical recognition.Pope Francis needs to apologise.

Pope Benedict wanted the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 14 being a literal example of salvation outside the Church in the present times and Bishop Schneider and Dr.Taylor Marshall are saying there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire in 1965-2021.

Bishop Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall are avoiding the fake premise ( invisible people are visible in the present times) and Pope Benedict and Pope Francis have to use it to create a break with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).

If the popes choose the rational premise ( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2021 are invisible) then they would be saying that in Vatican Council II,  LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc do not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, opposed by the Left.-Lionel Andrades



 AUGUST 28, 2021

Bishop Athanasius Schneider has said that there are no known literal cases of the baptism of desire in our human reality but Cardinal Ratzinger wrote Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus with there being literally known cases of being saved with the baptism of desire

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-has-said_28.html






Gesù, Tua Madre ci guida sulla via della Pace all'incontro con Te: Grazie per il Suo Cuore materno

Jesus founded only the Catholic Church

 by Joe Sixpack — The Every Catholic Guy  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  August 27, 2021   

Jesus founded only the Catholic Church

When discussing religion, it's sad when people say things like "the only thing that matters is that we all believe in the same God" or "one Christian religion is just as good as another" or "let's just agree to disagree." Why are these comments bothersome? Well, they all demonstrate a scandal of Christianity: There are so many Christian religions to choose from that people have become indifferent to the whole idea of thinking about which church is the right one.

Image
St. John Henry Newman

But we Catholics can honestly — and should assertively — say, "Jesus founded one Christian religion, and that religion is the Catholic Church!" The ecumenical movement of the '70s did far more damage than good. We squandered a perfect opportunity to gather millions of converts to Jesus' Church because leaders of the movement were terrified about the idea of offending non-Catholics. In reality, we should have demonstrated to people the things we have in common with their Christian religions, then led them to the reality of the Church founded by Christ.

There are a number of proofs that the Catholic Church was founded by Christ. The first one I always point to is history. Saint John Henry Newman, arguably the greatest Christian apologist of the 19th century, was a member of the Oxford Movement — a vehemently anti-Catholic organization in England. Fellow members tasked the young Anglican scholar with writing a history of Christianity. On the day his new Christian history was rolling off the printing press, Newman was being received into the Catholic Church. When asked what caused him to turn from his vehement anti-Catholicism to the point that he actually became a Catholic, his response was quite simple: "To know history is to be Catholic." Why? Because history alone proves that the Catholic Church was founded by Jesus Christ. (By the way, it was also Cdl. Newman who said the greatest tragedy in the Church is an ignorant laity. That's just food for thought.)

That Jesus founded the Catholic Church can also be proven from Sacred Scripture. The establishment of the Church came in the very act where Jesus made St. Peter the first pope:

Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, "Who do men say that the Son of Man is?" And they said, "Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets." He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." And Jesus answered him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in Heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of Heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in Heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in Heaven" (Matthew 16: 13–19).

This passage is pregnant with implications! Indeed, so much is said in these few words that we can't possibly cover it all in the limited space here. We will, however, spend a lot of time covering this passage thoroughly in later installments of this column. For now, though, let's deal with the elephant in the room.

Continued

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/not-one-among-many-but-the-only-one






France, Germany, Poland and Hungary need to interpret the baptism of desire (LG 14) like Bishop Athansius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall

 

AUGUST 4, 2021

Poland and Hungary need to adopt the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II

 ___________________________

FROM THE RIGHT HAND BARD/CLICK TO ACCESS



Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It has an exclusivist ecclesiology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council.html


Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-evangelising-with.html


Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II affirms the Social Kingship of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council_7.html



Questions and Answers : Did the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 make a factual mistake ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-did-letter-of.html
________________________________

Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II affirms the Social Kingship of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council_7.html

Questions and Answers : Evangelizing with Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-evangelising-with.html

Questions and Answers : Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. It has an exclusivist ecclesiology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/questions-and-answers-vatican-council.html

_________________________




The present 'Magisterium' supports the political Left on doctrine and has also made a factual mistake

If ' a ray of the Truth' (NA 2) is considered visible or invisible decides heresy


The theology of the Magisterium has gone off the rails. It is bad theology to assume there are objective cases on earth, in the present times, of people who are in Heaven
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/the-theology-of-magisterium-has-gone.html

Every one needs to be a Catholic : Those who are taught or not taught, those who know or do not know about the Church, will be decided by Jesushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/every-one-needs-to-be-catholic-those.html

It is the magisterium which has contradicted itself  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/it-is-magisterium-which-has.html

The Holy Office 1949 made a mistake. Cardinal Marchetti-Selvaggiani assumed there are known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus - Cantarella, CathInfo forum http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/the-holy-office-1949-made-mistake.html

At one of the two times, the magisterium has to be wrong http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/at-one-of-two-times-magisterium-has-to.html 




DECEMBER 12, 2019


Directors of Periodica de re canonica,the journal of the Faculty of Canon Law of the Pontifical Gregorian University interpret Vatican Council II irrationally : so they would discriminate against conservative students

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/directors-of-periodica-de-re.html

DECEMBER 12, 2019

ARCISODALIZIO

Canonists and speakers at the Archisodalitium, Curiae Romanae conferences overlook deception in the interpretation of Magisterial documents

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/canonists-and-speakers-at.html


DECEMBER 13, 2019


To reject a conservative Catholic student, who affirms EENS, Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms and the Syllabus of Errors is unfair. It is unfair to tell him that Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally, contradicts Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/to-reject-conservative-catholic-student.html


DECEMBER 11, 2019

Image result for Photo Angelium University   RomeImage result for Photo Gregorian  Rome

Irrationality would also be part of the religious formation of Catholic members of the judiciary in Italy

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/irrationality-would-also-be-part-of.html


DECEMBER 11, 2019


At the Angelicum and Gregorian University,Rome, they approve a doctoral thesis only of students who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.This is unethical and dishonest

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/at-angelicum-and-gregorian.html
 


 




 

 
        

OCTOBER 1, 2018
Polish Government must not use Pope Benedict's writings as a reference : does not affirm Social Reign of Christ the King and non separation of Church and State, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.or Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) which is the basis for the past ecclesiology of the Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/polish-government-must-use-pope.html

 SEPTEMBER 27, 2018

Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the error and this could be the official interpretation of the Council by the CDF
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-can-be-interpreted.html

 OCTOBER 2, 2018

When the Catholic Church in Hungary and Poland affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) then the Church's doctrine and theology would be the same as during the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/when-they-catholic-church-in-hungary.html


Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )


https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/08/poland-and-hungary-need-to-adopt-lionel.html