Lionel's blog
Joshua McElwee,the National Catholic Reporter's Vatican correspondent and International News Editor, interprets Magisterial documents, including the Creeds, with a false premise - just like the Lefebvrists, then he goes up to receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass. - Lionel Andrades
The Society of St.Pius X(SSPX), Italy has had a bad influence on some of the Catholic political parties here. The Fraternita San Pio X, Albano, interprets Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise. So they influence some of the Catholic political parties to do the same.They interpret Vatican Council II like the liberals i.e they use a false premise which creates a break with Tradition. The political parties need a Religious and Catechism section which will teach the Catholics the faith without the irrationality. It is the irrationality, the false premise, which is responsible for the liberalism expressed by the popes and the Left.Why must the Catholic political parties in Italy follow the theology of the Left? -Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Robert Sarah, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worshop, Vatican is still working on the new Amazon Rite or it has to be approved by Pope Francis if his work is finished. It will be break with the ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass of the 16th century, after Cardinal Sarah interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a non traditional conclusion. - Lionel Andrades
Una Voce and the Latin Mass Society could ask Pope Francis to clarify that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical and physically invisible cases in 2021.This is common sense.
Those who offer or attend Mass in Latin are being put down in the parishes since the bishops, cardinals and popes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so believe that Tradition has become obsolete.
When they interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms without the false premise then they become traditionalists and are unable to cite Vatican Council II to support their 55 -year- old liberalism. -Lionel Andrades
If Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia, Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, offered Holy Mass in Italian at the Basilica of St. Mary Majors, Rome it could be contested canonically. Since they use a false premise to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance.
The Rome Vicariate, in general, approves this schism and heresy, to appease the Left. - Lionel Andrades
There is a consecrated Italian woman, who does not belong to any religious community. She has recently finished her theological and catechetical studies in Rome. She now teaches religion to middle school children. She has to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to avoid saying there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church. If she interpreted Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally she could lose her job..-Lionel Andrades
The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate at the basilica of St.Mary Majors, Rome, are offering Holy Mass in Italian, while interpreting invisible cases of being saved with the the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. So they reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and in particular Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). With BOD and I.I interpreted with a false premise, the Nicene Creed ( I believe in one baptism) is changed and the Athanasius Creed ( all need Catholic faith for salvation) is rejected.This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass. To reject or change the meaning of the Creed is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II ( Ad Tuendam Fidem). -Lionel Andrades
At the Latin or Novus Ordo Mass the priest should be free to interpret Vatican Council II without the fake premise. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc refer to only invisible, hypothetical, speculative and theoretical cases in 2021.They are not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water.
Una Voce and the Latin Mass Societies are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise . So there is a rupture with Tradition . There is a break with the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass of the 16th century and the Byzantine Greek Mass of the fourth century..-Lionel Andrades
In Britain the liberals bishops and priests offer Holy Mass while interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a New Theology produces a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. This was the theology of the Catholic Church at the time of the English Martyrs.
So today there is no difference between the New Theology of the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass.
Even Bishop Arthur Roche, Secretary, Congregation for Divine Worship, Vatican offers Holy Mass while assuming LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.He maintained this policy when he was bishop of Leeds and Auxiliary Bishop of Westminister.
This was also the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the former secretaries of the Congregation for Divine Worship, Augustine di Noia and Annibale Bugnini (1969–1975)
This interpretation of the Council is irrational. There is an objective error.
The National Catholic Reporter(NCR) is to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a non traditional conclusion which could be avoided. They will also continue to mention Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray and others, as if they are relevant to the interpretation of the Council today.
The NCR interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. It is time to close that window. The old interpretation of Vatican Council II with the false premise is old propaganda. So what if the liberals were present at the Council, without the false premise, the Council is traditional it supports 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus.-Lionel Andrades
If the French bishops interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise, theologically, they would be traditionalists, affirming the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Chruch.
The French bishops were critical of the priests of who offer Mass in Latin(EF), since the Latin Mass is associated with traditional faith and morals, which they have rejected with their liberal interpretation of Vatican Council .Their liberal interpretation is based upon the false premise and inference. - Lionel Andrades
Una Voce and Dr. Joseph Shaw, Prof. Roberto dei Mattei and the weblog Rorate Caeili cannot tell the French bishops to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and so end the liberal-traditionalist divide.Since Shaw, Mattei and New Catholic at Rorate Caeili, would have to do the same.They would have to interpret the Council without the fake premise. They would also have to affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.- Lionel Andrades
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Archbishop Carlo Vigano still interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so they support the traditionalist-progressivist division in the Church. This was seen in the recent statement of the French Bishops on the traditionalists not following Vatican Council II.
The Council interpreted without the false premise is traditional on extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and so the liberals can no more quote the Council for their innovations in theology and doctrines.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
