Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Repost : In Hungary they do not have to accept the Catechism approved for the teaching for Catholics, by Soros and the Left

 OCTOBER 8, 2018

In Hungary they do not have to accept the Catechism approved for the teaching for Catholics, by Soros and the Left

OCTOBER 7, 2018


Catholics should be free to interpret all Church documents with Feeneyite theology and philosophy as it was done over the centuries in Hungary and the rest of Europe during the Austro-Hungarian Empire ( Graphics)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/catholics-should-be-free-to-interpret.html

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/in-hugary-they-do-not-have-to-accept.html

Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Sjizzarto must tell Cardinal Pietro Parolin to end the Leftist version of Catholicism in Hungary

The Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Sjizzarto must observe  that during the millennial when Hungary was Christian(as he has mentioned in the video),Hungary was really Catholic and this was not the Leftist Catholicism of the present- day- Vatican.

He must tell Cardinal Pietro Parolin to end the Leftist version of Catholicism in Hungary, Poland and the rest of East Europe.
Since George  Soros and the Left control the Vatican, the Catholic Church in Hungary has to use an irrational premise which contradicts common sense.Only in this way the Leftists  can change traditional Catholic Church- teaching, which was common during the time of the Austro Hungarian Empire.

Image result for Photos of the Habsburg Catholics
At the time of the Austro Hungarian Empire the Hapsburg family taught that outside the Catholic Church there was no salvation and that Jesus should be the centre of all social and political legislation with the non separation of the Catholic Church and State. The Catholic monarchy worked in harmony with the popes.
Today the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) is rejected by the Catholic Church in Hungary, which is controlled by the Vatican.This has happened since the Left insists that Catholics interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingite philosophy and theology, instead of the traditional and rational Feeneyite version. 
So Catholics in Hungary have to accept a rupture with the dogma EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology of the Church and the traditional doctrines on mission and salvation. 
The Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin must be asked not to impose this Leftist, political correctness on the Catholic Church in general and especially, the Church in Hungary, Poland and the rest of East Europe.
The Catholic Church must once again be free to say that all non Catholics and non Christians need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
The Leftists must not change Catholic doctrine on mission and salvation to meet their agenda of a New World Order with a new One World Religion.
Image result for Photos of the Habsburg Catholics
The Hungarian Foreign Minister could help by announcing:-  1.There are no known cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), with or without the baptism of water, which he knows of in 2018. This is common sense.
Risultati immagini per Cardinal Parolin
He could also ask Cardinal Pietro Parolin to make this same announcement.

2.He could announce that in the text of Vatican Council II, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases, only. This is common sense. So Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known over the centuries.


3.So it is false for the Left to insist that the Catholic Church claim BOD, BOB and I.I refer to objective people saved outside the Church and that these are personally known  exceptions to the teaching on all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
4.It is also false for the Left to insist that Vatican Council II is a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, since LG 8,LG 16, etc refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. Since if there were any such people they could only be known to God. We humans cannot see or meet any one saved outside the Church. So this is an irrational premise and inference being promoted by the Left and it is being imposed upon the whole Catholic Church including those in Hungary.
5.Also those who do not accept this Leftist interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS are threathened with the Anti-Semitic charge.We Catholics should be free to follow our Catholic doctrines with traditional theology.Non Catholics must not tell us what we should believe and what is permitted by them.They are also using this coercion on Catholics in Hungary.Why must Catholics repeat irrationally, that invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I refer to visible people saved outside the Church? Invisible cases are invisible! Why must Catholics repeat that unknown cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance(LG 16) or seeds of the Word(AG 11) are personally known and visible non Catholics saved outside the Church ? This is deception. There are no such known people.-Lionel Andrades



When the Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto says that Hungarian has been a Christian country for a millennium he means it has been a Catholic country - without the leftist doctrines on salvation of the present- day Vatican.

Hungary has been a Christian(Catholic) country for a millennium & will stay that way.”-Hungary Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/when-hungarian-foreign-minister-peter.html







02:21

Hungarian Foreign Minister, Peter Szijjarto, shocks CNN’s Christine Amanpour: “We reject multiculturalism”! “Hungary has been a Christian country for a millennium & will stay that way.”
https://gloria.tv/video/2yXUqkPcYptZAG1zxs8DCfcNM




OCTOBER 2, 2018

Image result for Viktor Orban photo

They have a choice in Hungary and Prime Minister Viktor Orban can ask that catechesis and catechism classes for children and adults be based on Vatican Council II Feeneyite and not Vatican Council II Cushingite

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/they-have-choice-in-hungary-and-prime.html


OCTOBER 2, 2018

Image result for Photos of the Habsburg Catholics


When the Catholic Church in Hungary and Poland affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) then the Church's doctrine and theology would be the same as during the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empire

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/when-they-catholic-church-in-hungary.html

Tommy Robinson fan told to quit her college course

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tommy-robinson-fan-told-get-13358299




Tommy Robinson poses for photo with grinning soldiers chanting his name

 https://metro.co.uk/2018/10/09/tommy-robinson-poses-for-photo-with-grinning-soldiers-chanting-his-name-8022299/?ito=cbshare
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

https://tommyrobinson.online/


Canadian profs bully female student into silence after she brought up abortion in class


Featured Image


CHILLIWACK, British Columbia, October 5, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Two profs at the University of the Fraser Valley browbeat a Christian student for almost an hour for bringing up abortion in the classroom.

Then-student Valerie Flokstra secretly recorded that meeting which took place last year. Former classmates who recently heard that recording were shocked by what they heard and urged her to make it public. A full transcript of the recording she made of her meeting with the two profs is available on National Campus Life Network's blog. 
Professor Nancy Norman and Department Head Vandy Britton ultimately told Flokstra that speaking about abortion made the classroom “unsafe.”
“So we don’t put forward ideas that are… intentionally or not… that are hateful. And I think sometimes abortion is one of those contentious issues that can make someone feel threatened on both sides,” said Britton.
Flokstra said that such comments made it appear as if the “program is about feeling safe” instead “about learning.” She said that she thought universities were “supposed to be places with freedom of speech and sharing ideas.” 
“I kind of feel like you are shutting me down,” she said at one point.
“Freedom of speech is that you have the opportunity to share provided it isn’t hurtful of other people. That’s the mandate of the university,” said Britton.
At no time in the discussion did Britton or Norman ever mention an actual complaint from a student about the mention of abortion in the classroom. According to Flokstra, there was no such complaint.
Ruth Shaw, executive director of National Life Campus Network, described what happened to Flokstra as “bullying.”
"It's unfortunate to see Canadian professors bullying a student for mentioning a medical statistic that was relevant," said Shaw in an interview.
Those who support abortion should examine their own consciences and consider why it is that any mention of abortion is so troubling to them, she added.  
The national pro-life organization has not yet decided what its next steps will be with regards to the University of the Fraser Valley's treatment of Flokstra. Shaw is disturbed by the incident and what it reveals about the profs' attitudes towards pro-lifers.
Flokstra told LifeSiteNews that while the classroom environment may be “safe” for others, her experience was that it was not safe for Christians. 
She recounted how during a previous meeting she had been told to keep her Christian identity to herself.
"All I could really remember was her saying that I had to put my Christian identity aside and put my teacher identity on top of that even though I assured her that my identity as a Christian helps me to deeply care about students as people and to be understanding of them," she said. 
Although the grad — who now works as a teacher in a private, Christian elementary school — felt welcome during her time studying physics and chemistry for her bachelor's degree of science, things changed for her when she then enrolled in the Teacher Education program. 
"I would really like (the University of the Fraser Valley) to look into the Teacher Education program," she said. “I was scared to be a Christian in that program." 
The University is so far refusing to discuss what happened to Flokstra. 
When contacted, the university's director of communications, Dave Pinton, ignored questions about Britton and Norman's treatment of Flokstra. Instead, he quoted from the Teacher Education department's handbook. 
It states: “The Teacher Education Department at UFV is committed to creating a respectful learning and working environment where the fundamental principles of human rights, as laid out in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, are upheld. The Teacher Education department is committed to providing accessible, usable, and welcoming spaces for all people regardless of their race, ethnicity, age, ability, gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, religion, nationality and/or citizenship status."
According to Pinton, students in the teacher education program are expected to uphold this commitment to respect and inclusivity in coursework, in field experiences and in their daily interactions with others.
Flokstra says the profs do not uphold this standard themselves, making some students feel uncomfortable. 
"(The university will) want to look at whether the profs are really committed to that," she said. "I want them to make sure the professors are creating a learning environment for all students, including Christians."
University president and vice-chancellor Dr. Joanne MacLean did not return an invitation to comment on this story by deadline. 
The incident smacks of then-teaching assistant Lindsay Shepherd's case in which three Wilfred Laurier University faculty members reduced her to tears, berated her for creating a “toxic climate” in class for playing an interview clip of professor Jordan Peterson. They repeatedly suggested she’d broken Canada’s new law enforcing the use of gender-neutral pronouns. In Shepherd's case, too, there was no complaint filed by any student. 
Wilfred Laurier University eventually apologized to Shepherd.
Contact info:
Respectful comments can be sent to the president and vice-chancellor of the University of the Fraser Valley here: presidentsoffice@ufv.ca

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-profs-bully-female-student-into-silence-after-she-brought-up-abort

Trans activists demand everyone be pro-LGBT – at the expense of reality

Image result for Photos Transgender receive blood donationsImage result for Photos Transgender receive blood donations

Trans activists demand everyone be pro-LGBT – at the expense of reality

October 9, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – There are many things to say about the transgender movement as of late. They are increasingly totalitarian in their demands. They have declared war on all those who disagree with them. They pose a very real danger to children, who are declaring themselves to be “trans” in record numbers. And they are also extraordinarily self-centred.
There are multiple examples of this. The now infamous “bathroom wars” are one example, with biological males and biological females demanding access to the bathrooms reserved for the opposite sex – regardless of whether or not they have physically transitioned. Other exclusively female facilities – battered women’s shelters, for example – are also not safe from biological men claiming to be women and demanding access. The feelings of those who rely on these facilities are never considered.
But things get even worse when trans activists begin to demand that medical institutions bend to their will. One transgender person even had the gall to complainon Twitter that breast cancer patients were getting life-saving mastectomies before self-identified transgender people could get their healthy breasts amputated due to gender dysphoria – despite the fact that for breast cancer patients, mastectomies can often be a matter of life or death.
And in Canada, a biological woman identifying as a transgender man is now declaring war on the Canadian Blood Services, demanding that they change their screening policy. And why? Because when “Jack” Biamonte, who donates blood quite regularly, revealed a recent hysterectomy surgery to the staff, she was forced to endure an “embarrassing experience,” according to the CBC.
The staff apparently told Biamonte that in answering the questions, it was important to answer with the “sex assigned at birth,” which is the way the media now refers to the sex you were born into (as if the doctor just took a guess or something.) This was apparently quite traumatic. “It was just reinforced, ‘You were born female; we have to consider you female,’” Biamonte said. Which, from a medical perspective, is absolutely true.
Two specific questions really piqued Biamonte’s ire: “Have you had a pregnancy over the past six months?” and “Have you slept with a male who has slept with a male?” According to Biamonte, for “A lot of people, that’s really going to upset them. That’s really going to trigger them.” Biamonte didn’t explain why these questions would prove triggering to those who are transitioning or considering doing so, especially considering the fact that the Canadian Blood Services actually permits trans individuals to mark down the gender they’ve transitioned into one year after genital-mutilation surgery.
Responding to media queries concerning the complaints of a single transgender person – Canada’s state broadcaster has been doing tremendous work carrying water for the transgender movement – the Canadian Blood Services pointed out that the donor criteria are “based on the best available scientific evidence,” as approved by the regulator, Health Canada. As the CBC noted:
That means trans men born female are screened as women and questioned about pregnancies, as donors who have had a pregnancy are more likely to have antibodies in their blood that may cause a rare but potentially fatal complication in a recipient. 
In short, this means that the policy of the Canadian Blood Services, which is based on scientific evidence and is in place to protect people’s lives from potentially fatal danger, must stay in place for public safety purposes. Biamonte, however, clearly feels that this is kind of transphobic, stating that “he disagrees that the policy is based on science.” To prove this supremely arrogant assertion, she offered precisely no counter-evidence in response.
“The screening process needs to change,” she told the CBC. “There needs to be more medically pertinent questions that are based on actual fact and not just general bias.” She then promised to continue badgering the Canadian Blood Services, apparently mistaking them for an organization dedicated to soothing the triggered feelings of radical activists rather than an organization founded to provide life-saving services.
Many people have decided to ignore the transgender movement because they have assumed that it will not impact their lives in any way. As I’ve noted before, the transgender movement is genuinely dangerous, and if they have their way, they will transform the way our society – and every institution within our society, medical facilities included – sees gender. And they have already proven that they are perfectly willing to do this even if others must pay the cost.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/transgender-blood-bank-dispute

Repost : I don't expect Muslims to say that Catholicism is a true religion. And I hardly think they would be shocked or insulted to hear that I think that Islam is a false religion - Joseph Shaw

JANUARY 19, 2015


I don't expect Muslims to say that Catholicism is a true religion. And I hardly think they would be shocked or insulted to hear that I think that Islam is a false religion

I don't expect Muslims to say that Catholicism is a true religion. And I hardly think they would be shocked or insulted to hear that I think that Islam is a false religion. The falsity has consequences, and we must take those consequences as seriously as the Muslims, from their own perspective, take them.-Joseph Shaw
 
 
There are Catholics who don't want society to be reformed in accordance with God's will, but the teaching of the Church is clear. Christ must be the king of society, His reign must be over states as well as individuals. If there are laws which don't accord with God's will, they are unjust and Catholics must struggle to change them. It is an obligation particularly laid upon the laity - or so says Vatican II...
 
What I want to say again and again is that the demands of Islam must be considered and rejected - if we are going to reject them - on their merits as substantive demands. Since in many cases they are based on theological claims, that means assessing the validity of those claims. The secularists are desperate not to cede the validity of theological arguments, but their position is incoherent. If theological arguments are sound, they should be listened to. If they are unsound, we need to hear why.

There is a good reason not to impose Sharia Law on England. It is not because it is 'religious', nor because it is 'against human rights'. If it really came from God these arguments would have zero weight. The argument against Sharia Law is that it is not from God: that it is a false revelation. This can be shown by arguments based on Natural Law as well as by arguments for the truth of the Christian revelation. These are arguments we need to make, and to hear.

http://www.lmschairman.org/2015/01/political-islam-political-christianity.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/01/i-dont-expect-muslims-to-say-that.html

Repost : Wrong conclusion also of the St.Benedict Centers and the SSPX (USA) : is this why they are not answering the two questions ?

DECEMBER 23, 2014


Wrong conclusion also of the St.Benedict Centers and the SSPX (USA) : is this why they are not answering the two questions ?

Louis Tofari the SSPX USA Communications Officer and Bro.Andre Marie MICM, Prior , St.Benedict Center (Fr.Leonard Feeney's community),N.H, USA will not answer two questions on the Catholic Faith.
They are two simple questions. Why don't they want to answer them ?
TWO QUESTIONS 
1) Do we personally know the dead now saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc,can we see them, are they physically visible to us in 2014 ?
2) Since we do not know any of these cases, in real life, they are not visible for us, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or Ad Gentes 7 which states 'all' need 'faith and baptism' for salvation ?
Is the answer YES or NO?
 
The SSPX USA and the St.Benedict Centers in the diocese of Manchester and Worcester interpret Vatican Council II assuming that the dead now in Heaven are physically visible to us in 2014. So for them these cases are exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is how Bishop Bernard Fellay, Roberto de Mattei, Bruno Gherardini and others interpret the Council .
So many times I have asked Bro. Thomas Augustine,MICM, the Prior, at the St.Benedict Center,Still River,USA if we can see the dead on earth and he would not answer this question.I would have to keep repeating the question,in one e-mail, as he would go off into another direction.
This was the error made by the Holy Office and the Boston Ecclesiastical Curia in 1949. They assumed that we could see the dead saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. Then they concluded that these cases are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
No pope corrected the error.The same confusion was repeated in Vatican Council II.
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican did not isue a correction. Instead, with the irrational premise, being able to see the dead, he interpreted Vatican Council II. He then incorporated the error into theCatechism of the Catholic Church, Dominus Iesus, Ut Unum Sint and other magisterial documents.
Now the Vatican Curia expects theFranciscans of the Immaculate and theSSPX to accept Vatican Council II interpreted with this irrational premise; the dead now in Heaven are physically visible to us. So the conclusion is that these deceased are explicit exceptions to the dogma on salvation and Tradition.Their wrong conclusion is : Vatican Council II contradicts the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is the wrong conclusion also of the St.Benedict Centers and the SSPX USA.So is this why they are not answering the two questions?


-Lionel Andrades

SSPX USA still refuses to answer the two questions


 

The baptism of desire cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, in the sense, that these cases are not humanly visible on earth

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2014/12/wrong-conclusion-also-of-stbenedict.html