Catholics have to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to legally get admission in pontifical universities and for employment in Catholic institutions e.g the Legion of Christ university in Rome.-Lionel Andrades
Saturday, August 8, 2020
How can Fr. Francesco Giordano, a professor at the Angelicum and Director of the Human Life International, Rome legally be considered a Catholic when he uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and considers the conclusion; an objective error,to be the work of the Holy Spirit ?
How can Fr. Francesco Giordano, a professor at the Angelicum and Director of the Human Life International, Rome legally be considered a Catholic when he uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and considers the conclusion; an objective error,to be the work of the Holy Spirit ?
Why does a Catholic priest have to lie at the Angelicum to keep his teaching job? He has to re interpret Magisterial documents to create heresy and schism in order to continue teaching there.He has to use a false premise and inference and then they call it a development of doctrine. -Lionel Andrades
How can Fr.Timoner, Master General of the Dominicans and member of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, allow the Angelicum University in Rome to legally disinvite (rescind the matriculatioin/enrollment) of Catholic students or seminarians who do not interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a false break with Catholic Tradition? Why is it necessary legally for a Catholic student to lie his Faith ? This is discrimination based upon religion at a pontifical university supported by the Dominicans, the Vatican and the Rome municipality. The professors have to lie to keep their teaching job. This is expected of them by the pontifical university and the Dominicans.They have to re-interpret the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II.
How can Fr.Timoner, Master General of the Dominicans and member of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, allow the Angelicum University in Rome to legally disinvite (rescind the matriculatioin/enrollment) of Catholic students or seminarians who do not interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a false break with Catholic Tradition?
Why is it necessary legally for a Catholic student to lie his Faith ? This is discrimination based upon religion at a pontifical university supported by the Dominicans, the Vatican and the Rome municipality.
The professors have to lie to keep their teaching job. This is expected of them by the pontifical university and the Dominicans.They have to re-interpret the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
Bishop Barron and Michael Voris interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise instead of without it.The present two popes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and they must switch to Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.
Faithful Catholics do not question or repudiate the authority of the Second Vatican Council.- Michael Voris
Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise is a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors ) etc. It is a falsehood and it is not magisterial. All faithful Catholics should reject it.
Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise is not a rupture with Tradition ( Athanasius Creed etc) . It is line with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church.All faithful Catholics should accept Vatican Council II, interpreted without the false premise.
Bishop Barron and Michael Voris interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise instead of without it.The present two popes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and they must switch to Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.- Lionel Andrades
https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-barron-bishops-running-scared
Roberto de Mattei must admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made an objective mistake in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He used a false premise which concludes in a rupture with Tradition.No one told Lefebvre about Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise.
Roberto de Mattei must admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made an objective mistake in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He used a false premise which concludes in a rupture with Tradition.No one told Lefebvre about Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise. -Lionel Andrades
Archbishop Giancarlo Perego in the diocese of Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy is no more a liberal when he affirms EENS and the Syllabus which are supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Ask him to affirm Tradition and the Council
Archbishop Giancarlo Perego in the diocese of Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy is no more a liberal when he affirms EENS and the Syllabus which are supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Ask him to affirm Tradition and the Council.-Lionel Andrades
Massimo Faggioli does not want to accept Vatican Council II without the false premise and so then have to affirm EENS and the Syllabus.But it is the same with Dr.Joseph Shaw, John Lamont,Thomas Pink, Taylor Marshall, Michael Matt, Peter Kwasniewski, John Henry Weston and the sedevacantist bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas
Massimo Faggioli does not want to accept Vatican Council II without the false premise and so then have to affirm EENS and the Syllabus.But it is the same with Dr.Joseph Shaw, John Lamont,Thomas Pink, Taylor Marshall, Michael Matt, Peter Kwasniewski, John Henry Weston and the sedevacantist bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas. -Lionel Andrades
Bishop Athanasius Schneider needs the hermeneutic of continuity
Bishop Athanasius Schneider needs the hermeneutic of continuity to survive in Kazhakstan and for practical reasons does not affirm the Faith ? He is avoiding all contact with me. -Lionel Andrades
Why are Archbishop Lefebvre's books still being promoted by the SSPX when he has interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise, false inference and non traditional conclusion ? The SSPX can interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and there will no more be a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus etc).
Why are Archbishop Lefebvre's books still being promoted by the SSPX when he has interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise, false inference and non traditional conclusion ? The SSPX can interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and there will no more be a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus etc). -Lionel Andrades
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) used a false premise. Wojytla, Ratzinger, Cushing and Lefebvre did not notice the error
The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) used a false premise. Wojytla, Ratzinger, Cushing and Lefebvre did not notice the error. -Lionel Andrades
All these years Bishop Donald Sanborn was telling us how important it was to follow the past Magisterium of the Church and Tradition in general and how wrong were the popes from Paul VI. So now why does he not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise ? He and Fr. Anthony Cekada also owe an apology to the St.Benedict Centers.
All these years Bishop Donald Sanborn was telling us how important it was to follow the past Magisterium of the Church and Tradition in general and how wrong were the popes from Paul VI. So now why does he not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise ?
He and Fr. Anthony Cekada also owe an apology to the St.Benedict Centers. -Lionel Andrades
Fr.Dwight Longenecker interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and considers it the norm in the Catholic Church. In a way he is correct.But he does not know that without the false premise, he would be traditional on ecumenism, EENS, ecclesiology etc. He would be affirming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church like the traditionalists whom he criticizes.
Fr.Dwight Longenecker interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and considers it the norm in the Catholic Church. In a way he is correct.But he does not know that without the false premise, he would be traditional on ecumenism, EENS, ecclesiology etc. He would be affirming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church like the traditionalists whom he criticizes.- Lionel Andrades
The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) priests in Albano, Italy must admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made an objective error in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He uses a false premise and created, unknown to him, a rupture with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus etc )
The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) priests in Albano, Italy must admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made an objective error in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He uses a false premise and created, unknown to him, a rupture with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus etc ) -Lionel Andrades
Peter Kwasniewski in his latest report on Vatican Council II did not mention that all Wojtyla and Ratzinger's statements and comments on Vatican Council II were made with the false premise
Peter Kwasniewski in his latest report on Vatican Council II did not mention that all Wojtyla and Ratzinger's statements and comments on Vatican Council II were made with the false premise.
John Paul II still is my favourite pope.-Lionel Andrades
______________________________
Lefebvrists are circling the wagons.There is a report by Peter Kwasniewski on Life Sites News not addressing the issue of the false premise.He only quotes other Lefebvrist sources.
He is saying nothing new outside the familiar propaganda which keeps him accepted by the liberals and trads.
Similarly Fr.Dwignt Longnecker has a report praising Bishop Robert Barron and criticizing Life Sites and Dr. Taylor Marshall. Again, not mentioning that without the false premise there is no rupture with Feeneyite EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and the Catechisms interpreted rationally.
The Lefebvrists need to remove their books and also Fr. Hans Kungs's books on Vatican Council II, from the book shelves.Archbishop Lefebvre, Roberto dei Mattei, Christopher Ferrara and Fr. Gruner made the same error.
So today they are on the defensive. Circling the wagons.
There books on Vatican Council II are written with a false premise and so their conclusion is objectively wrong.It is a break with Catholic Tradition.-Lionel Andrades
When there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to EENS and the Syllabus there is no stopping the main line Catholic Church from going back to Tradition in the 1930's and over the centuries.
When there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to EENS and the Syllabus there is no stopping the main line Catholic Church from going back to Tradition in the 1930's and over the centuries.-Lionel Andrades
We have the opportunity to take the main line Catholic Church back to the 1930's. The time of St. Maximillian Kolbe.
We have the opportunity to take the main line Catholic Church back to the 1930's. The time of St. Maximillian Kolbe. - Lionel Andrades
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
