All the theologians who will vote at the
October 2023 Synod interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally
to produce a fake break with Tradition.
-Lionel Andrades
Lionel's blog
All the theologians who will vote at the
October 2023 Synod interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally
to produce a fake break with Tradition.
-Lionel Andrades
John Henry Weston and Taylor Marshall
choose to remain politically correct with the Left before the Amazon Synod.
They do not talk about Vatican Council II rational and irrational.
LifeSite News is not organizing a
conference before the Synod in October to affirm Vatican Council II rational
and ask the cardinals, bishops, priests and religious sisters to do the same. Instead
LifeSite is holding a conference in Rome in October at the end of the Synod.
This will propagate the Synod innovation, on faith and morals, based upon
Vatican Council II irrational.It will avoid the real issue- Vatican Council II rational or irrational.
So even if Life Site News issues a petition
after the Synod what difference does it make? None. Since Life Site News does not
want to affirm Vatican Council II rational and neither do the cardinals, bishops,
priests and religious sisters at the Synod.
Vatican Council II interpreted
rationally does not support innovation like married priests. There are no literal
cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) said Bishop Athanasius Schneider in an
interview with Taylor Marshall. We now know that there are no literal cases of
LG 8, 14, 15, 15, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc in 1965-2023. So the Council can no more be a break
with the Syllabus of Errors and the old theology. This can be the only ethical
interpretation of Vatican Council II.
For the organizers of the Synod there
is ‘ a spirit of Vatican Council II’, ‘ a new revelation’, ‘ a revolution’,
which comes when Vatican Council II, or any Church Document, is interpreted by
confusing what is physically invisible (
LG 16 etc) as being physically visible exceptions for the ecclesiology of the
old Roman Missal, the dogma EENS, and all the Catechisms, Creeds and Church Councils.
This is also how Fr. Altman and the Coalition for Cancelled priests interpret
Vatican Council II, wrongly.
Peter Kwasniewski in his theological review of the Amazon Synod does not speak about Vatican Council II rational and irrational and how the Pachamama and other innovation in the faith is based upon ‘the revolution’ of Vatican Council II, irrational. Kwasniewski does not want to affirm Vatican Council II, rational, which will support Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So the Council interpreted rationally, would support the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church. So theologically there can no more be a new ecumenism, new ecclesiology, new theology etc. So there cannot be women priests etc in the name of Vatican Council II, rational.The council can ethically only be interpreted rationally.so there is no theological opening for liberalism.
So what is the point in LifeSite News
criticism of the Synod when John Henry Weston himself will not affirm the Faith
in public on the salvation dogma etc? LifeSite News is in the same boat as cardinals Hollerich and Grech. Of course, JHW will not affirm the break in moral
teachings as these two cardinals but he will interpret Vatican Council II irrationally,
like these two cardinals, who use the Council to justify their liberalism.
The Fatima Center at this Conference
for the Amazon Synod did not mention Vatican Council II rational which is important for the Masons.
Cardinals Grech and Hollerich could
say that they follow the political Left, with heresy and schism, to avoid being
ruined financially. It is the same for Steve Jalsevic and John Henry Weston at
LifeSite News. All their correspondents are following the same politically
correct policy of the Synod organizers. Even Mother Miriam interprets the
Council irrationally and politically.
-Lionel Andrades
Timothy Gordon and Coetus
International are not saying that with Vatican Council II rational, the Council
supports Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla sales.With EENS intact at Vatican Council II, there is no new
ecclesiology , with a new ecumenism, new evangelization, etc. So there cannot be any theological
innovation any more in the name of Vatican Council II. Women ordination cannot
be justified with Vatican Council II any more.