Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Bishop Athanasius Schneider has accepted the new moral theology and so he cannot call a holder or supporter of heresy, a heretic.

Image result for Photo bishop athanasius schneider
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has accepted  the new moral theology and so he cannot call a holder or supporter of heresy, a heretic.
The German bishops give the Eucharist at Holy Mass  to Protestants.This contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.This is heresy. They do not accept the de fide teachings on faith and morals.
The German bishops give the Eucharist to non Catholics in mixed marriages .Since they do not accept the dogma EENS, the couple is not living in adultery.
The English bishops give the Eucharist to practising homosexuals.Since this is not a mortal sin for them.
The present two popes overlook all this.
They do not correct the German and English bishops and order them to end this sacrilege and sin.This is schism with the past popes and the past Magisterium.
This is public heresy.
For whatever reason, the error is not being corrected.The heresy is not being denied and neither are actions undertaken to stop it. 
So the popes and bishops are in mortal sin. 
An ecclesiastic who supports such heresy in faith and morals is a heretic.
Attentuating circumstances, lack of free will cannot be a norm in general.If there are conditions which aid salvation they would be known only to God.

The conditions for exceptions can only be known to God but the new moral theology makes it the norm. 
So if someone is living in mortal sin in general this is the norm for going to Hell.We cannot say that  in general a couple living in concubinage is an exception.But this is the new moral and salvation theology being taught at Pontifical universities and semanaries in Italy. 
It is the same on the issue of salvation and faith.
Every one who is outside the Church is going to Hell but this is the faith-norm which the present two popes reject.
Every one who is living in the homosexual life style is going to Hell at the time of death.This is the moral norm which the present two popes do not affirm.
This is heresy.
This is a mortal sin of faith and a mortal sin or morals and so the present two popes are heretics.
They are not magisterial on these issues since the Holy Spirit cannot teach error  and sin.
Instead they support the political Left which general  represents Satan.
But Bishop Schneider cannot call the present two popes heretics.
-Lionel Andrades


May 21, 2019

Image result for pHOTO bISHOP scHNEIDER


Bishop Athanasius Schneider is a theological liberal on faith and morals. He applies the New Theology to faith and morals.He overlooks manifest heresy on faith-issues which can be read on line and he also overlooks mortal sin manifested in repeated pastoral expression which was documented in the Open Letter to the Bishops by some 19 original signatories 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/bishop-athanasius-schneider-is.html 

 

 

May 16, 2019

 

Directors of the Diocesan Offices for Pastoral Mission will use Cushingite theology to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.The super dicastery will do the same. There are no objections from Cushingite traditionalists and conservative Catholics, including cardinals and bishops

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/directors-of-diocesan-offices-for.html

 

 


'He will be missed': Wallabies prepare for life after Folau

The Baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS since it does not exist in our reality. This was known to the popes and saints. So the Feeneyite affirms the baptism of desire, he does not reject it. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to EENS.

 Comments( awaiting moderation) on the blog Unam Sanctam Catholicam, St.Ambrose and the Baptism of Desire

 I sympathize with the "Feeneyite" opinion that God provides water Baptism to all who are saved, though I acknowledge it is not the dogma of the Church.

 
Lionel: Pope Pius XII called extra ecclesiam nulla salus an infallible teaching. It was defined three times by three Church Councils.This is historically accepted.
_________________


 Suffice it to say, the Church should formally define the *limits* of Baptism of Desire, because the theory has remained nebulous and has tended toward latitudinarianism.
Lionel: The Baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS since it does not exist in our reality. This was known to the popes and saints.
So the Feeneyite affirms the baptism of desire, he does not reject it. Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to EENS.

____________________


 Fr. Feeney's position (all of the elect actually receive water Baptism), even if true, doesn't seem to be in the Deposit of Faith
Lionel: It is there in the writings of Aquinas, Augustine, Bellarmine etc. They affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS and invisible and unknown cases of the baptism of desire etc were not exceptions to EENS for them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 20, 2019

St. Ambrose could not state it 'as a fact' that it happened since if it would happen it could only be known to God as a fact. This is the nature of the baptism of desire.It simply does not exist in our reality.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/boniface-ambrose-could-not-state-it-as.html

St.Benedict Fund to defend the Feeneyite and not Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS is $41,229.64

 Catholic Missionary
St.Benedict Fund to defend the Feeneyite and not Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS is $41,229.64 .







Baptism of Desire Promoters: SSPX (Msgr. Lefebvre), Fatima Center (Fr. Gruner, John Vennari and Fr. Paul Kramer), American Catholic Lawyers Association (Christopher Ferrara), Catholic Family News (Brian McCall and Matt Gaspers) and The Remnant ( Michael Matt) and Michal Voris and Boniface on the blog Unam Sanctam Catholicam

Dear Mr. Voris,

Re: The Vortex. Truth and Enemies of Truth

Truth

Divine Good News:
“Amen, amen I say to thee, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God”  (John 3:5).

Divinely Revealed Dogma:
“There is but one universal [katholikos /catholic] Church of the faithful, outside of which no one at all is saved” (Pope Innocent III, Fourth Lateran Council).


Enemies of  Truth


CCC 846: Changed the Fourth Lateran Council's divinely revealed dogma meaning from “outside the Church”  to  “inside the Church.”
Lionel: This is when it is interpreted with Cushingism and not Feeneyism.
____________________________

SBC Richmond NH: “We affirm that the dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus must be interpreted according to the official doctrine of the Church."  [Meaning not necessarily believed as stated.]
Lionel : The ecclesiastics at the Vatican interpret EENS with Cushingism while Brother Andre Marie MICM interprets it with Feeneyism. 
____________________________

EWTN (Colin Donovan): “The doctrine that 'Outside the Church there is no salvation' is one that is constantly misinterpreted by those who won't submit to the Magisterium of the Church.”
Lionel: Colin Donovan like the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith interprets EENS with Cushingism.They also interpret the baptism of desire etc with Cushingism.
_____________________________

Baltimore Catechism: Corrupted the Nicene Creed's “one baptism” to three baptisms: “water, blood and desire;” an error of desire (Eph 4;20-21) and not what we learned from Christ. (Mark 16:15-16.)
Lionel: They did not clarify that the baptism of desire is not visible or repeatable like the baptism of water and there are no baptism of desire cases which can be judged and known to us human beings.
______________________________

There is nothing from the Solemn Magisterium to support “baptism of desire” as a substitute for the Sacrament of Baptism and membership in the Church. The Council of Trent (held to counter Martin Luther's “Justification by Faith Alone”) defined that the absolution of original sin can only be by the Sacrament of Baptism. (Session 6 Chapter 7), nor is there salvation without water baptism. (Session 7 Canon 2)
Lionel. I agree.
______________________________

Baptism of Desire Promoters: SSPX (Msgr. Lefebvre), Fatima Center (Fr. Gruner, John Vennari and Fr. Paul Kramer), American Catholic Lawyers Association (Christopher Ferrara), Catholic Family News (Brian McCall and Matt Gaspers) and The Remnant ( Michael Matt).
Lionel: I agree.Supporters also include the present two popes who interpret the baptism of desire with Cushingism i.e they refer to personally known people saved outside the Church. So they become exceptions to EENS.
Even Michael Voris, Christine Niles and the others at Church Militant TV interpret the baptism of desire with Cushingism.They also interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc) with Cushingim, which results in heresy.It is the same with Boniface on the blog Unam Sanctam Catholicam.
-Lionel Andrades