27 DE NOVEMBRO DE 2019
O Juramento de Fidelidade como Bispo feito pelo Cardeal Raymond Leo Burke e pelo Bispo Athanasius Schneider foi baseado em uma interpretação irracional do Concílio Vaticano II e, portanto, era falso. Assinatura, ele não interpretou o Concílio Vaticano II racionalmente.Portanto, o Concílio rompeu com o Credo de Atanásio, o dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus e o Catecismo do Papa Pio X no EENS. O entendimento dos apóstolos e do credo de Nicene também teria mudado.
Isso seria o resultado, já que o batismo do desejo (BDD), o batismo de sangue (BDB) e ser salvo na ignorância invencível (I.I) se refeririam a casos fisicamente visíveis para ele. Não eram casos invisíveis. Somente dessa maneira BDD, BDB e I.I seriam exceções ao EENS e à eclesiologia do passado para ele. Ele não era um feeneyita.
Da mesma forma, o LG 14 (batismo do desejo), o LG 16 (ignorância invencível) etc. contradiriam o EENS tradicional, a eclesiologia do passado e um ecumenismo de retorno para ele. Portanto, houve confusão e também uma rejeição do Concílio Vaticano II.
Foi com toda essa confusão doutrinária e a nova teologia, baseada no visível para ele BOD, BOB e I.I, que o cardeal Burke fez o Juramento de Fidelidade, quando foi nomeado para a Assinatura.
Entonces, el Cardenal Burke durante sus estudios teológicos y filosóficos interpretó el Concilio Vaticano II con una premisa falsa al igual que el Papa Pablo VI.
Cuando el cardenal Raymond Burke estudió derecho canónico, no sabía que el Concilio Vaticano II, cuando se interpretó con LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22, etc., se refería solo a casos hipotéticos. No lo sabía, por lo que no sabía que LG 8, etc. no contradiría la eclesiología pasada y la EENS del siglo XVI. Él era un liberal. Su liberalismo se basaba en BOD, BOB y yo. Yo soy una excepción a Feeneyite EENS.
On December 10, 1994, Pope John Paul II named Burke Bishop of the Diocese of La Crosse and consecrated him on January 6, 1995, in St. Peter's Basilica. Burke took possession of the See of La Crosse on February 22, 1995.
Seu Juramento de Fidelidade foi ao modernismo. Sua interpretação do Concílio Vaticano II foi modernista. Foi herético. Desde que rejeitou o Credo de Atanásio, etc.
In 2000, Burke convened the fifth diocesan synod for the Diocese of La Crosse, which resulted in the publication of Synod V, acts: celebrated June 11–14, 2000 in 2003. In 2002, he was influential in founding the Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem, an order of Augustinian canons dedicated to the Tridentine Mass, the traditional form of the liturgy in the Latin Church.
Assim, os Cônegos Regulares da Nova Jerusalém e o cardeal Raymond Leo Burke ofereceriam as rubricas da Missa do Rito Tridentino com a nova eclesiologia baseada em casos visíveis de BOD, BOB e I.I. Isso significa para eles que houve exceções práticas à eclesiologia passada dos missionários no século XVI, quando eles ofereceram a Missa Latina.
Novamente, ele poderia recitar o Credo Niceno, mas interpretaria o Concílio Vaticano II, todos os Catecismos, todos os Credos e outros documentos magisteriais, assumindo que havia casos literais de BDB,BDS e I.I nos tempos atuais.
É importante notar que o Papa Bento XVI e o Cardeal
Raymond Burke interpretou o Concílio Vaticano II, o
Catecismos e Credos, com a hermenêutica da ruptura
com tradição. Eles fariam isso confundindo a explicação explícita distinção implícita, visível-invisível, hipotética real.
Casos desconhecidos de DBO, BOB e I.I foram assumidos pelo Papa Bento e Cardeal Burke, a serem conhecidas exceções à EENS feeneyita e a eclesiologia exclusivista do passado Igreja Católica.
On June 10, 2019, Burke, Cardinal Jānis Pujats, and three other bishops published a 40-point "Declaration of Truths" claiming to reaffirm traditional Church teaching. The bishops wrote that such a declaration was necessary in a time of "almost universal doctrinal confusion and disorientation."
BOD, BOB e I.I eram exceções práticas aos EENS tradicionais para o cardeal Burke e o cardeal Janis Pujats. Portanto, não afirmaram a eclesiologia eclesiocêntrica tradicional da Igreja. Como o Papa Francisco e o Papa Bento, eles promoveram uma vaga cristologia. Havia uma nova teologia da salvação. Afirmaria a necessidade de crer em Jesus para a salvação, sem a necessidade de entrar na Igreja Católica com fé e com o batismo na água (Ad Gentes 7). Se alguém entrou na Igreja Católica para a salvação, era aceitável para eles - mas em geral não era obrigatório.
Specific passages in the declaration implicitly relate to several writings by Pope Francis, and some of them are seen as criticism or even opposition. The declaration states that "the religion born of faith in Jesus Christ" is the "only religion positively willed by God," seemingly alluding to a document signed by Pope Francis on February 4 called "Human Fraternity" which stated that the "diversity of religions" is "willed by God."
Portanto, isso poderia significar que outras religiões cristãs são caminhos iguais para a salvação como a Igreja Católica. Seus membros não precisam de fé e batismo na Igreja Católica. Deus deseja o cardeal Burke e o bispo Schneider.
Essa também é a confusão nas declarações do bispo Athanasius Schneider e dos tradicionalistas de Lefebvrist.
-Lionel Andrades
The Oath of Fidelity as a Bishop made by Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider was based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and so it was false.When Cardinal Burke was appointed by Pope John Paul II to the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura,he did not interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
The Oath of Fidelity as a Bishop made by Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider was based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and so it was false.When Cardinal Burke was appointed by Pope John Paul II to the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura,he did not interpret Vatican Council II rationally. So the Council was a rupture with the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechism of Pope Pius X on EENS. The understanding of the Apostles and Nicene Creed would also have been changed. 
This would be the result,since the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) would refer to physically visible cases for him. They were not invisible cases. Only in this way could BOD, BOB and I.I be exceptions to EENS and the past ecclesiology for him. He was not a Feeneyite.Similarly LG 14(baptism of desire), LG 16(invincible ignorance) etc would contradict traditional EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return for him. So there was confusion and also a rejection of Vatican Council II.It was with all this doctrinal confusion and the new theology, based upon visible- for- him BOD, BOB and I.I,that Cardinal Burke, made the Oath of Fidelity, when he was appointed to the Signatura.From 1968 to 1971, he studied at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., as a Basselin scholar, receiving a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1970 and a Master of Arts degree in 1971, both in philosophy. He completed studies for the priesthood at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome between 1971 and 1975, receiving a Bachelor of Sacred Theology degree and a Master of Arts degree. Pope Paul VI ordained Burke to the priesthood on June 29, 1975, in St. Peter's Basilica.-Wikipedia So Cardinal Burke during his theological and philosophical studies was interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise just like Pope Paul VI.After his ordination to the priesthood, Burke was assigned as assistant rector of the Cathedral of St. Joseph the Workman in La Crosse, Wisconsin. He also taught religion at Aquinas High School in La Crosse.] From 1980 to 1984, Burke studied canon law at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, where he received a licentiate in canon law in 1982 and a doctorate in canon law in 1984. He then returned to La Crosse where he was named the Moderator of the Curia and Vice Chancellor of the La Crosse diocese.When Cardinal Raymond Burke studied Canon Law he did not know that Vatican Council II, when interpreted with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc, referred to only hypothetical cases. He did not know.So he did not know that LG 8 etc would not contradict the past ecclesiology and 16th century EENS. He was a liberal.His liberalism was based upon BOD, BOB and I. I being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
On December 10, 1994, Pope John Paul II named Burke Bishop of the Diocese of La Crosse and consecrated him on January 6, 1995, in St. Peter's Basilica. Burke took possession of the See of La Crosse on February 22, 1995
His Oath of Fidelity was to modernism. His interpretation of Vatican Council II was modernistic. It was heretical. Since it rejected the Athanasius Creed etc.
In 2000, Burke convened the fifth diocesan synod for the Diocese of La Crosse, which resulted in the publication of Synod V, acts: celebrated June 11–14, 2000 in 2003. In 2002, he was influential in founding the Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem, an order of Augustinian canons dedicated to the Tridentine Mass, the traditional form of the liturgy in the Latin Church
So the Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem and Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke would be offering the rubrics of the Tridentine Rite Mass with the new ecclesiology based upon visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. This means for them there were practical exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the missionaries in the 16th century, when they offered the Latin Mass.
On December 2, 2003, Burke was named Archbishop of St. Louis, succeeding Cardinal Justin Francis Rigali, who had been appointed Archbishop of Philadelphia. He was installed on January 26, 2004, and was presented with the pallium on June 29, 2004, by Pope John Paul II.
Again, he could have recited the Nicene Creed but he would be interpreting Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms, all the Creeds and other magisterial documents, by assuming there were literal cases of BOD, BOB and I.I in the present times.
In July 2006, Benedict XVI appointed Burke a member of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, the highest court in the Catholic Church. In May 6, 2008, Pope Benedict XVI gave Burke two Vatican assignments. He was named a member of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, which interprets canon law, and a member of the Congregation for the Clergy.
It is important to note that Pope Benedict and Cardinal
Raymond Burke interpreted Vatican Council II, the
Catechisms and the Creeds, with the hermeneutic of rupture
with Tradition. They would do this by confusing the explicit-
implicit, visible-invisible, real-hypothetical distinction.So unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were assumed by Pope
Benedict and Cardinal Burke, to be known exceptions to
Feeneyite EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the
Catholic Church.
On June 10, 2019, Burke, Cardinal Jānis Pujats, and three other bishops published a 40-point "Declaration of Truths" claiming to reaffirm traditional Church teaching. The bishops wrote that such a declaration was necessary in a time of "almost universal doctrinal confusion and disorientation."
BOD, BOB and I.I were practical exceptions to traditional EENS for Cardinal Burke and Cardinal Janis Pujats.So they did not affirm the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Church. Like Pope Francis and Pope Benedict, they promoted a vague Christology. There was a new salvation theology. It would affirm the necessity of believing in Jesus for salvation, without the necessity of entering the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water (Ad Gentes 7).If someone entered the Catholic Church for salvation it was acceptable for them -but in general it was not obligatory.
Specific passages in the declaration implicitly relate to several writings by Pope Francis, and some of them are seen as criticism or even opposition. The declaration states that "the religion born of faith in Jesus Christ" is the "only religion positively willed by God," seemingly alluding to a document signed by Pope Francis on February 4 called "Human Fraternity" which stated that the "diversity of religions" is "willed by God."
So it could mean other Christian religions are equal paths to salvation as the Catholic Church.Their members do not need faith and baptism, in the Catholic Church. This is willed by God for Cardinal Burke and Bishop Schneider.
This is also the confusion in the statements of Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Lefebvrist traditionalists.
-Lionel Andrades
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Leo_Burke
________________________
Bishop's Oath of Fidelity : how does he interpret Vatican Council II ?
It is simple for a bishop to recite the Oath of Fidelity.However he also must clarify his interpretation of Vatican Council II. How does he interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II ? Do they refer to invisible and not visible people in the present times ?.Are they examples of known people saved outside the Catholic Church? Today all the bishops assume that these hypothetical cases (LG 8 etc) are objective people in 2019. They are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the past ecclesiology.Since they are exceptions they would have to be known and visible. people. Invisible people cannot be practical exceptions to all needing to enter the Church for salvation.
So with this error the bishop recites the Nicene Creed. Then his Oath of Fidelity really is meaningless. Since he affirms ing heresy and modernism.He interprets Vatican Council II with a false reasoning.
It is the same for a Profession of Faith, of a priest or nun. The will interpret magisterial documents irrationally.They must not be obedient to a superior, for example, who interprets Vatican Council ii, irrationally.
If LG 8 etc refers to visible people saved outside the Church, there is known salvation outside the Church. So the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors and Catechisms, which affirm the past ecclesiology become obsolete.The interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed change.
If LG 8 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only, then they are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church. They are are not literal exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc.There is no change in our understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed .Outside the Church there is no salvation.There is one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins which can be administered repeatedly. There are not three personally known baptisms. We cannot see someone receive the baptism of desire and neither can we give it to someone.The Nicene Creed refers to one known baptism in real life.
I have mentioned in a previous blog post that the Profession of Faith is useless today. The Oath Against Modernism is meaningless.Instead Catholics should be asked how do they interpret Vatican Council II. How do they interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II ? Are they invisible or visible, implicit or explicit, subjective or objective,hypothetical or real, for you ?. This decides it.It decides if we are faithful or modernist, orthodox or unorthodox.It decides if we really are Catholic or heretical.One interpretation is rational and the other irrational.-Lionel Andrades
Primer on Feeneyism and Cushingism
Posts
