They have a choice in Hungary and Prime Minister Viktor Orban can ask that catechesis and catechism classes for children and adults be based on Vatican Council II Feeneyite and not Vatican Council II Cushingite.

Thought police for the Left are controlling the catechesis classes  in the parishes of Italy this week but this can be avoided by the Catholic Church in Hungary.They do not have to accept the catechism for children approved by Soros, Rockefeller and the the One- World -Government- and- Religion people. They have a choice in Hungary and Prime Minister  Viktor Orban     can ask that catechesis fof adults and catechism classes for children and adults be based on Vatican Council II Feeneyite and not Vatican Council II Cushingite.Similarly the children and adults will be taught to interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Feeneyism ( invisible cases are invisible) and avoid Cushingism( unknown non Catholics are known exceptions to the traditional exclusivist salvation theology).

In Italy priests and nuns are not free to affirm Vatican Council II and EENS Feeneyite and instead have to teach the irrational Cushingite philosophy and theology, which creates a rupture with Tradition.

If they affirmed Vatican Council II and EENS Feeneyite they would be telling children and adults in catechesis that outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation and all need faith and baptism to go to Heaven and avoid Hell. (Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).They would be saying that LG 8,LG 16, UR 3 etc in Vatican Council II are only hypothetical cases.So they are not objective exceptions to Ad Gentes 7, the dogma EENS or the Catechism of Pope Pius X which all say that every one needs to be a member of the Church for salvation.

EENS and the old Catechisms do not mention invincible ignorance etc as referring to known people. Since obviously it refers to invisible people who cannot be exceptions to EENS.

So this can be taught in Hungary. Since Hungary does not follow the Left. They do not have to follow the Leftist  interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS. The children can be taught that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell without Catholic faith which includes the baptism of water(AG 7).Catholics can be taught once again, as in the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, that all people need to be members of the Church for salvation.So to avoid Hell a priority is that all legislation have as its centre, Jesus Christ, as he is known and taught by the Catholic Church and that there be no separation of Church and State.Instead Satanic secularism and State must be separated for the eternal good of people.

Viktor Orban can ask that the Catholic Church in Hungary at least affirm Feeneyite Vatican Council II and EENS and proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King with the non separation of Church and State.He could give them this freedom.

He can order that priests and nuns be free, without the threat of suspension.No one will tell them  to affirm Vatican Council  and EENS Cushingite.In this way he can avoid the Italian model of catechism classes which are controlled by the secular state, with compromised doctrine and theology.

Catholics should be free to interpret all Church documents; all Magisterial documents, with rational and traditional Feeneyism as a theology and philosophy as it was done over the centuries in Hungary and the rest of Europe.-Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 1, 2018

Polish Government must not use Pope Benedict's writings as a reference : does not affirm Social Reign of Christ the King and non separation of Church and State, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.or Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) which is the basis for the past ecclesiology of the Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/polish-government-must-use-pope.html

 SEPTEMBER 27, 2018

Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the error and this could be the official interpretation of the Council by the CDF

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/vatican-council-ii-can-be-interpreted.html

 OCTOBER 2, 2018

When the Catholic Church in Hungary and Poland affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) then the Church's doctrine and theology would be the same as during the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empire

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/when-they-catholic-church-in-hungary.html

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018

Thought police to control Catholic catechesis from Sept.23 in the parishes

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/thought-police-to-control-catholic.html

When the Catholic Church in Hungary and Poland affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) then the Church's doctrine and theology would be the same as during the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

The Hapsburg family in the Astro Hungarian Empire were Catholics who held the past exclusivist ecclesiology on salvation and the past theology on hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc,not being objective exceptions to the teaching on all needing to be members of the  Roman Catholic Church, to avoid Hell.

The Prime Minister of Hungary, Vitor Orban must observe  that the Catholic Church in Hungary and Poland today do not affirm the exclusivist ecclesiology on salvation. Instead they have accepted an innovative new theology, which assumes invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, are visible exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was known in the past over the centuries in Europe.

They are all making an objective mistake on Vatican Council II. There is a Vatican Council II in which Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to allegedly visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church and there is a Vatican Council II in which LG 8 and LG 16 refer to invisible and unknown non Catholics saved outside the Church but only hypothetical cases.

The former interpretation of Vatican Council II I call Cushingite and the latter Feeneyite.

When the Catholic Church in Hungary and Poland will affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) then the Church's doctrine and theology would be the same as during the time of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

So it is important for the Catholic Church to switch from Vatican Council II Cushingite to Vatican Council II Feeneyite.This must be done in Hungary and througout Europe.-Lionel Andrades

Dr. Levatino Destroys Abortion in 2 Minutes

Therese de Liseux

BENEDICTINE TROUBLE

Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM), USA are lay Benedictines following the doctrines and theology of St. Benedict himself  and the monks of Mt. Cassino of his time.

This is rejected by the former Abbot Primate Notker Wolf, a German, who resides at the Benedictine University of St. Anselm in Rome.(See 4:39 on the video below) It is rejected officially and publically by the Benedictines in general all over the world.
The MHFM, like St. Benedict, affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and reject the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)as being objective exceptions to EENS.It is the same as the Jesuit Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.But they would consider the official Benedictines at St. Anselm as being sectarian.Since they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to non Catholics saved outside the Church, thus contradicting the dogma EENS as it was known and taught by the Benedictines of the past.

Like the new communities of the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate(F.I), former religious sisters, who still live in community as religious,but are registered as a society, Michael and Peter Dimond, live the religious life as Benedictines and attend the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) as lay men.

While the the former Abbot Primate Notker Wolf offers Holy Mass as a religious, and holds the secular leftist interpretation of EENS and BOD,BOB and I.I.So he has rejected the strict interpretation of EENS according to the founder of his community.With a new ecclesiology, based upon visible for him BOD, BOB and I.I he offers the new Mass.This is a rupture with the ecclesiology of  the Mass as it was offered by the Benedictines before the Letter of the Holy Office(1949).

For me, the former Abbot Primate Notker Wolf, a Bavarian who ended his term in 2016,and still speaks on Catholic issues for the Benedictines and is the author of many books,represents a false church, with a false theology and philosophy, within the true Church.He does not affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with the ecclesiology of the Church during the time of St. Benedict. This is an error also of the MHFM.

So today, for vocations, the Benedictines would only accept candidates to the religious life who choose to affirm a rupture with the theology and philosophy of St. Benedict.

So candidates must choose to interpret Magisterial documents with an irrationality.

Michael and Peter Dimond would have no chance to  join the Benedictines.Since they avoid the irrationality when interpreting EENS. Perhaps this could be a reason why the founder of the MHFM left the official Benedictines.

I too would have no chance of entering the Benedictines since for me invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are not visible exceptions to EENS. Neither does Lumen Gentium 8 contradict EENS as it was known to the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.For the Benedictines, it does contradict EENS.

Notker Wolf osb, cannot really call himself a Benedictine according to the Rule of St.Benedict, since heresy and schism would be a mortal sin for the original Benedictines.It is also unethical, a lie and deception to use an irrationality ( invisible non Catholics are physically visible to us human beings in general)  to reject the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return), the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church which indicated the necessity of the non separation of Church and State, to save souls from going to Hell.

So the 'official' Benedictines are telling a lie in public, and this comes under the area of secular Italian law. 

Also according to Catholic Canon Law a juridical person, like an Abbot, is not permitted to publically reject the de fide teachings of the Catholic Church,nor tell a lie and not repent. 

He must correct the scandal before he offers Holy Mass.

I will e-mail this blog post to the Benedictines and would expect a reply from them.I would also like to ask them to answer these two additional questions, which are quite simple.

1. Can we humans physically see non Catholics saved with the the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and in invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water? My answer is obviously NO.

2.Can we humans physically see non Catholics saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8),'invisible ignorance'(LG 16), the case of the unknown catechumen who desired the baptism of water before he died ( LG 14),non Catholics saved with 'good will' (GS 22),non Catholics saved with 'a ray of that Truth'(NA2) etc in 2018 or over the last 50 years ? My answer is NO.

Michael and Peter Dimond would also answer these questions with a NO.This is common sense.

-Lionel Andrades

http://test.anselmianum.com/facolta-di-teologia/professori-di-teologia/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notker_Wolf