Saturday, August 31, 2019
When I say there is a schism from the Left I am identifying a reality which can be corrected.It is not permanent.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) can make an announcement and correct the common mistake
When I say there is a schism from the Left I am identifying a reality which can be corrected.It is not permanent.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) can make an announcement and correct the common error.
I affirm all magisterial documents. I am not in schism or a sedevacantist.I affirm Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
1.When I say that there are no personally known and visible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance in our reality every one agrees with me.
2.When I say that Vatican Council II(Ad Gentes 7) says all need faith and baptism for salvation, every one agrees with me.
So this is basically what I have to say. The ordinary means of salvation, the norm for salvation is faith and baptism and there are no known exceptions.There is no known salvation outside the Church. There is no known extraordinary means of salvation for us human beings.
The popes,cardinals and bishops can agree with me on these two points.
So we are back to the old ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and outside the church there is no salvation without rejecting Vatican Council II. Instead Vatican Council II is my primary reference.
So the ecclesiastics at the CDF would agree with me on these two important points which can end the present schism from the Left.
Now that we know there is no known salvation outside the Church we can correct the error.Possibilities of salvation outside the Church are known only to God are not real people in 2019. So there are no exceptions in Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Church to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. 1
People usually say that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are exceptions to the dogmaextra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) when they really should be saying that they are not exceptions.
They should address the issue of schism in the Catholic Church created with the interpretation of magisterial documents with irrational Cushingism, especially Vatican Council II.2
Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with the irrational premise and so the schism is corrected. He can stop doing this and tell others to do the same.
Division is caused when the popes, cardinals and bishops interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality to create a division and rupture with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors).They could begin by explaining the difference between Vatican Council II interpreted with a false premise and a Council interpreted without it.They could then show how Vatican Council II with the false premise is divisive and schismatic and without this error, the Church returns to orthodoxy. -Lionel Andrades
1
2
Poland, Hungary and Slovakia follow the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus .So there is no tension with a schismatic Vatican.The bishops conferences support the leftist schism in the Catholic Church.
Poland,
Hungary and Slovakia follow the irrational interpretation
of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) .So there is no tension with a
schismatic Vatican.The bishops conferences support the leftist schism in the Catholic Church.
The bishops conferences are not aware that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are supporting a schism, with the popes of the past.
They have to use a false premise to create a rupture with the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King with the non separation of Church and State.
1.So with the false premise, Catholics in Poland, Hungary, Slovakia,Croatia etc reject the Athanasius Creed which states outside the Church there is no salvation.
2.They then reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Magisterium of the 16th century.
2.They then reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Magisterium of the 16th century.
3.They have changed the Nicene Creed with their understanding of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I, referring to personally known, visible and objective non Catholics saved outside the Church. So it is no more, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'.Instead it is 'I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire, blood, invincible ignorance), they are visible and personally known and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.'
4.They have changed the understanding of the Apostles Creed.When we say 'I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'.For centuries the Holy Spirit taught outside the Church there is salvation. Now the new teaching is outside the Church there is known salvation.
5.They interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so LG 8 emerges as an exception to the dogma EENS. This was expressed officially and in public by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, at the Placuet Deo Press Conference when a journalist of the Associated Press asked him, if the Church still held that it had the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.
A priest in Rome who offered the Traditional Latin Mass said that there were no known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance. They would only be known to God. So he was saying that BOD, BOB and I.I were not exceptions to EENS.
This was common sense.
It is obvious that we cannot know of any one saved outside or within the Church with BOD,BOB and I.I.
This was common sense.
It is obvious that we cannot know of any one saved outside or within the Church with BOD,BOB and I.I.
But for saying this , which I mentioned on this blog, this priest was called up by Archbishop Matteo Zuppi.He was at that time the Auxiliary Bishop of Rome and an active member of the Sant Egido community.
The priest was indirectly saying that he was no more supporting the Leftist schism in the Catholic Church. He was saying that there could only be the traditional strict interpretation of EENS since BOD, BOB and I.I could not be physical exceptions to EENS.
This was not allowed.
The Archbishop then came and met the community.After a week the priest was allowed to offer Holy Mass.
Other priests who do not accept the Leftist schism in the Catholic Church supported with Anti Semitic and under leftist laws, are treated in the same way.
Catholic religious, who go back to Tradition, ignoring the irrational interpretation of magisterial documents by using a false premise, are being persecuted by ecclesiastical Masonry.
The St.Benedict Center, New Hampshire, who affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and Vatican Council II without the false premise, has been officially labelled non Catholic.This is the decision of Bishop Peter Libasci, bishop of the Diocese of Manchester, USA and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).The decision was approved by the far left Southern Poverty Law Center(SPLC).They would not sue the diocese and the Vatican under some leftist law they have created.
Similarly, after Michael Voris produced a good video saying that the Catholic Church is the fulfillment and completion of the Jewish religion and that outside the Catholic Church, there is no salvation. The Archbishop of Detroit, asked Michael not to call his media , Real Catholic TV. So Michael had to remove the word Catholic.Otherwise he would legally not be Catholic for the Left.
Until today CMTV cannot make that particular video available for all and restrict it to premium members of CMTV.
Michael Voris reacted with a program critical of Abraham Foxman and the ADL.
Presently the Catholic bishops conferences of Poland, Hungary and Slovakia are also following this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS and and so there is no tension with a schismatic Vatican on this point.-Lionel Andrades
Presently the popes, the CDF and the Vatican Curia support the schism from the Left
A schism from the Left is still a schism. They have put aside the Athanasius Creed, changed the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, changed the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms, rejected the Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return and still expect Catholics to accept mortal sins of faith.
This is a schism with the popes and Magisterium of the past.
In March 2016 Pope Benedict confirmed that he did not interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the missionaries in the 16th century. He also interpreted Vatican Council II in LG 16, GS 22 etc, referring to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So they were objective exceptions to the dogma EENS according to the 16th century Magisterium.He was using the false premise.1
He also indicated in the Avvenire interview that with his interpretation of Vatican Council II , there was no need for mission any more.
This is a schism with the popes and Magisterium of the past.2
This is a schism with the popes and Magisterium of the past.2
Now to end this schism Catholics need to see that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not exceptions to EENS .Neither are LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc exceptions to 16th century EENS.So the Church still teaches exclusive salvation. The Catholic Church affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Presently the popes, the CDF and the Vatican Curia support the schism from the Left.-Lionel Andrades
1
2
So with the false premise there are objective exceptions to EENS etc:-
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
1
Their false premise is:-
1. Invisible people are visible.
2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.
3.The
unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but
dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.
4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.
5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking who are saved outside the Church.
8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.
9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.
10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.2
So with the false premise there are objective exceptions to EENS etc:-
1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.
2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins'
over the centuries referred to only one known baptism, the baptism of
water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the
baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or
more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and
ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic
Church'.
3.
The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy
Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy
Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation
outside the Church.Now unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism
of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2,
GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of
salvation outside the Church.
4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)
in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for
Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with
their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With
the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It
affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible
ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics
saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a
hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris
Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration etc were
all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive
salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted
EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past
ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without
the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the
necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
